Paper · 1998 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Effect of Varied N‐fertilization on Yield Formation of Winter Wheat under Particular Consideration of Mainstems and Tillers

F.‐X. Maidl; E. Sticksel; F. Retzer; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Two‐year field trials with winter wheat in nine N‐fertilizer treatments were conducted in southern Bavaria to investigate the basis of yield stability and yield superiority of N‐fertilization strategies with emphasis on N‐application during stem elongation. In measurements of individual plants the contribution of mainstems and tillers to yield formation was examined. While grain yield showed only slight differences, significant differences between harvest indices were observed among the fertilizer treatments. High harvest indices were regularly recorded in low stand densities. Individual plant analysis proved that early N‐application led to high stand densities which intensified reduction processes during ear development. N‐fertilization with emphasis on stem elongation lessened reduction processes. Low yield of tillers was mainly attributed to a low grain number per ear. Differences in grain yield between mainstems and tillers could not be modified by means of N‐fertilizer treatment. Highest yields on mainstems as well as on tillers were recorded in N‐fertilizer treatment with emphasis on stem elongation. This study demonstrates that an excessive initiation of yield components causes an unproductive consumption of resources which is detrimental to yield formation. It is concluded that optimum N‐fertilizer treatment should aim at plant stands with strong individual plants which can be achieved by emphasis of N‐fertilization during stem elongation. The stimulation of the initiation of yield organs is of minor importance as compared to a decrease of reduction process.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of winter wheat differed only slightly among N-fertilizer treatments in southern Bavaria.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
fertilizer treatmentse3
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Setting
southern Bavariae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were conducted in southern Bavaria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“field trials with winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
e2

“While grain yield showed only slight differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–427 · show in text ↑
e3

“significant differences between harvest indices were observed among the fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–522 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index differed significantly among the N-fertilizer treatments of winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
fertilizer treatmentse3
Outcome
harvest indicese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“field trials with winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
e3

“significant differences between harvest indices were observed among the fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–522 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High harvest indices of winter wheat were regularly recorded in low stand densities.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
low stand densitiese4
Outcome
harvest indicese4
Direction
Highe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“field trials with winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
e4

“High harvest indices were regularly recorded in low stand densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early N-application led to high stand densities in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
early N‐applicatione5
Outcome
stand densitiese5
Direction
highe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“field trials with winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
e5

“Individual plant analysis proved that early N‐application led to high stand densities which intensified reduction processes during ear development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early N-application intensified reduction processes during ear development in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
eare5
Treatment
early N‐applicatione5
Outcome
reduction processes during ear developmente5
Direction
intensifiede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“field trials with winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
e5

“Individual plant analysis proved that early N‐application led to high stand densities which intensified reduction processes during ear development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-fertilization with emphasis on stem elongation lessened reduction processes in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
N‐fertilization with emphasis on stem elongatione6
Outcome
reduction processese6
Direction
lessenede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“field trials with winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
e6

“N‐fertilization with emphasis on stem elongation lessened reduction processes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–818 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Low yield of tillers in winter wheat is mainly attributed to a low grain number per ear.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
yield of tillerse7
Qualifier
low grain number per eare7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“field trials with winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
e7

“Low yield of tillers was mainly attributed to a low grain number per ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in grain yield between mainstems and tillers of winter wheat could not be modified by N-fertilizer treatment.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
mainstems and tillerse0
Treatment
N‐fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
Differences in grain yield between mainstems and tillerse0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“field trials with winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“Differences in grain yield between mainstems and tillers could not be modified by means of N‐fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest yields on mainstems and tillers of winter wheat were recorded in N-fertilizer treatment with emphasis on stem elongation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
N‐fertilizer treatment with emphasis on stem elongatione0
Outcome
yields on mainstems as well as on tillerse0
Direction
Higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“field trials with winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“Highest yields on mainstems as well as on tillers were recorded in N‐fertilizer treatment with emphasis on stem elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1131 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

An excessive initiation of yield components causes unproductive resource consumption that is detrimental to yield formation in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
yield formatione0
Qualifier
an excessive initiation of yield components causes an unproductive consumption of resourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“field trials with winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“an excessive initiation of yield components causes an unproductive consumption of resources which is detrimental to yield formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1293 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum N-fertilizer treatment should aim at winter wheat plant stands with strong individual plants.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
plant stands with strong individual plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“field trials with winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“optimum N‐fertilizer treatment should aim at plant stands with strong individual plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1403 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Stimulation of the initiation of yield organs is of minor importance compared with a decrease of reduction processes in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
initiation of yield organse0
Qualifier
minor importance as compared to a decrease of reduction processe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“field trials with winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“The stimulation of the initiation of yield organs is of minor importance as compared to a decrease of reduction process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1600 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 426 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.