Paper · 2016 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Split Nitrogen Application Improves Wheat Baking Quality by Influencing Protein Composition Rather Than Concentration

Cheng Xue; Gunda Schulte auf’m Erley; Anne Rossmann; et al.

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
105
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The use of late nitrogen (N) fertilization (N application at late growth stages of wheat, e.g., booting, heading or anthesis) to improve baking quality of wheat has been questioned. Although it increases protein concentration, the beneficial effect on baking quality (bread loaf volume) needs to be clearly understood. Two pot experiments were conducted aiming to evaluate whether late N is effective under controlled conditions and if these effects result from increased N rate or N splitting. Late N fertilizers were applied either as additional N or split from the basal N at late boot stage or heading in the form of nitrate-N or urea. Results showed that late N fertilization improved loaf volume of wheat flour by increasing grain protein concentration and altering its composition. Increasing N rate mainly enhanced grain protein quantitatively. However, N splitting changed grain protein composition by enhancing the percentages of gliadins and glutenins as well as certain high molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS), which led to an improved baking quality of wheat flour. The late N effects were greater when applied as nitrate-N than urea. The proportions of glutenin and x-type HMW-GS were more important than the overall protein concentration in determining baking quality. N splitting is more effective in improving wheat quality than the increase in the N rate by late N, which offers the potential to cut down N fertilization rates in wheat production systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late nitrogen fertilization improved wheat flour loaf volume.

Treatment
late N fertilizatione0
Outcome
loaf volumee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that late N fertilization improved loaf volume of wheat flour by increasing grain protein concentration and altering its composition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late nitrogen fertilization increased wheat grain protein concentration.

Treatment
late N fertilizatione0
Outcome
grain protein concentratione0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that late N fertilization improved loaf volume of wheat flour by increasing grain protein concentration and altering its composition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late nitrogen fertilization altered wheat grain protein composition.

Treatment
late N fertilizatione0
Outcome
compositione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that late N fertilization improved loaf volume of wheat flour by increasing grain protein concentration and altering its composition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen rate mainly enhanced the quantity of wheat grain protein.

Treatment
Increasing N ratee0
Outcome
grain proteine0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing N rate mainly enhanced grain protein quantitatively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen splitting increased the percentages of gliadins, glutenins and certain high molecular weight glutenin subunits in wheat.

Treatment
N splittinge0
Outcome
percentages of gliadins and glutenins as well as certain high molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS)e0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N splitting changed grain protein composition by enhancing the percentages of gliadins and glutenins as well as certain high molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS), which led to an improved baking quality of wheat flour.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1087 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen splitting improved wheat flour baking quality through changes in grain protein composition.

Treatment
N splittinge0
Outcome
improved baking qualitye0
Qualifier
changed grain protein compositione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N splitting changed grain protein composition by enhancing the percentages of gliadins and glutenins as well as certain high molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS), which led to an improved baking quality of wheat flour.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1087 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late nitrogen effects in wheat were greater with nitrate-N than urea.

Treatment
nitrate-Ne0
Outcome
late N effects were greatere0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The late N effects were greater when applied as nitrate-N than urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutenin and x-type HMW-GS proportions were more important than overall protein concentration in determining wheat baking quality.

Gene
glutenin and x-type HMW-GSe0
Outcome
baking qualitye0
Comparator
overall protein concentratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proportions of glutenin and x-type HMW-GS were more important than the overall protein concentration in determining baking quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen splitting improved wheat quality more effectively than increasing nitrogen rate through late nitrogen application.

Treatment
N splittinge0
Outcome
wheat qualitye0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
increase in the N rate by late Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N splitting is more effective in improving wheat quality than the increase in the N rate by late N, which offers the potential to cut down N fertilization rates in wheat production systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1482 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen splitting offers potential to reduce nitrogen fertilization rates in wheat production.

Treatment
N splittinge0
Outcome
cut down N fertilization ratese0
Qualifier
potentiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N splitting is more effective in improving wheat quality than the increase in the N rate by late N, which offers the potential to cut down N fertilization rates in wheat production systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1482 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.