Paper · 1986 · Tropical Pest Management

Competition and control of itchgrass(rottboellia exaltata)in maize(zea mays)

D. Sharma; O. Zelaya

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Experiments in the North and Atlantic Coastal areas of Honduras determined the critical period of competition of Rottboellia exaltata (itchgrass) with maize, and established cultural and chemical methods for control. The critical period of competition lies between 30 and 45 d after planting; plots should be kept weed free during this period to avoid significant reduction in yield. Unweeded R. exaltata reduced maize yield by about 80%. Among control treatments, a combination of atrazine and pen‐dimethalin at 1–2 and 1–3 kg a.i./ha gave the highest yield. Supplementary post‐emergence control by hoeing or using paraquat could help attain yields comparable to those obtained in the plots kept weed free throughout the growing period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The critical itchgrass competition period in maize was 30 to 45 days after planting.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
itchgrasst0weed
Outcome
critical period of competitione0
Value
30 and 45 de0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“itchgrass(rottboellia exaltata)in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“The critical period of competition lies between 30 and 45 d after planting; plots should be kept weed free during this period to avoid significant reduction in yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–392 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unweeded itchgrass reduced maize yield by about 80%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Unweeded R. exaltatae0
Interactor
R. exaltataOphiuros exaltatuse0weed
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“itchgrass(rottboellia exaltata)in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Unweeded R. exaltata reduced maize yield by about 80%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine and pendimethalin together produced the highest maize yield among control treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
a combination of atrazine and pen‐dimethalin at 1–2 and 1–3 kg a.i./hae0
Interactor
itchgrasst0weed
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“itchgrass(rottboellia exaltata)in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among control treatments, a combination of atrazine and pen‐dimethalin at 1–2 and 1–3 kg a.i./ha gave the highest yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementary hoeing or paraquat could attain yields comparable with season long weed free plots.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Supplementary post‐emergence control by hoeing or using paraquate0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
plots kept weed free throughout the growing periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Supplementary post‐emergence control by hoeing or using paraquat could help attain yields comparable to those obtained in the plots kept weed free throughout the growing period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–746 · show in text ↑

paraquat · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

16 papers: 8 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

54 papers: 52 positive, 2 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.