Paper · 2001 · Weed Science

Integrated management of itchgrass in a corn cropping system: modeling the effect of control tactics

M. C. Smith; B. E. Valverde; A. Merayo; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A population model of itchgrass was developed for a typical corn–based cropping system in the Pacific coastal region of Costa Rica. Field experiments were conducted to quantify density-dependent seedling mortality and fecundity. Additional information required for the model was obtained from the literature. Effect of control methods on itchgrass density—including a leguminous cover crop (velvetbean), a preemergence herbicide (pendimethalin), and classical biocontrol with the head smut—alone and in combination, were investigated using the model. According to model results, the cover crop planted at high and low densities between corn rows was highly efficient, reducing the initial itchgrass density from 54 plants m−2 to 4 and 17 plants m−2, respectively. Associating velvetbean with corn solely in the first crop each year resulted in predicted itchgrass densities of 33 and 36 plants m−2 (at high and low cover crop planting densities, respectively). The improvement in corn yield from preemergence herbicide or biocontrol in addition to the cover crop was only modest. This indicated that if, in practice, the cover crop is as effective as predicted, an inexpensive control tactic such as biological control (provided that an infection rate of at least 50% can be achieved) should be given priority to prevent income losses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

High-density velvetbean cover cropping reduced predicted itchgrass density from 54 to 4 plants per square metre.

Treatment
cover crop planted at highe0
Interactor
itchgrasse0weed
Outcome
itchgrass densitye0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
4 plants m−2e0
Comparator
initial itchgrass densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cover crop planted at high and low densities between corn rows was highly efficient, reducing the initial itchgrass density from 54 plants m−2 to 4 and 17 plants m−2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Low-density velvetbean cover cropping reduced predicted itchgrass density from 54 to 17 plants per square metre.

Treatment
cover crop planted at high and low densitiese0
Interactor
itchgrasse0weed
Outcome
itchgrass densitye0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
17 plants m−2e0
Comparator
initial itchgrass densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cover crop planted at high and low densities between corn rows was highly efficient, reducing the initial itchgrass density from 54 plants m−2 to 4 and 17 plants m−2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Using velvetbean only in the first yearly corn crop predicted 33 itchgrass plants per square metre at high density.

Treatment
Associating velvetbean with corn solely in the first crop each yeare0
Interactor
itchgrasse0weed
Outcome
itchgrass densitiese0
Value
33e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Associating velvetbean with corn solely in the first crop each year resulted in predicted itchgrass densities of 33 and 36 plants m−2 (at high and low cover crop planting densities, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Using velvetbean only in the first yearly corn crop predicted 36 itchgrass plants per square metre at low density.

Treatment
Associating velvetbean with corn solely in the first crop each yeare0
Interactor
itchgrasse0weed
Outcome
itchgrass densitiese0
Value
36 plants m−2e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Associating velvetbean with corn solely in the first crop each year resulted in predicted itchgrass densities of 33 and 36 plants m−2 (at high and low cover crop planting densities, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Adding preemergence herbicide to the cover crop modestly improved corn yield.

Treatment
preemergence herbicidee0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Qualifier
only modeste0
Comparator
cover crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The improvement in corn yield from preemergence herbicide or biocontrol in addition to the cover crop was only modest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Adding biocontrol to the cover crop modestly improved corn yield.

Treatment
biocontrole0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Qualifier
only modeste0
Comparator
cover crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The improvement in corn yield from preemergence herbicide or biocontrol in addition to the cover crop was only modest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1078 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended inexpensive biocontrol if cover cropping works as predicted and infection reaches at least 50%.

Outcome
biological controle0
Qualifier
infection rate of at least 50%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“an inexpensive control tactic such as biological control (provided that an infection rate of at least 50% can be achieved) should be given priority to prevent income losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1334 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.