Abstract
SUMMARY The influence of three rates of each of N, P and K fertilizers on the availability of native and applied Mn to wheat was studied in a field experiment on an alluvial soil of the Indo-Gangetic plain. Increasing dressings of N as ammonium sulphate resulted in consistently higher yields and Mn uptake by the crop. Concentration of Mn in the grain increased with increasing N dressings when native Mn and Mn fertilizer supplied this nutrient but it was unaffected inplants sprayed with Mn. Adding P as superphosphate tended to lower the concentration of Mn in the grain when relying on native or applied Mn but it significantly enhanced the crop yield and total Mn uptake. Applying K as muriate of potash slightly depressed Mn uptake by plants. Potassium had a more pronounced effect in the absence of P fertilizer. The concentration of Mn in thestraw was not significantly affected by N, P and K fertilization.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing N dressings raised wheat yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Increasing dressings of N as ammonium sulphatee0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Increasing dressings of N as ammonium sulphate resulted in consistently higher yields and Mn uptake by the crop”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing N dressings raised wheat Mn uptake.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Increasing dressings of N as ammonium sulphatee0
- Outcome
- Mn uptakee0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Increasing dressings of N as ammonium sulphate resulted in consistently higher yields and Mn uptake by the crop”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain Mn concentration increased with N when Mn came from native or fertilizer sources.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- increasing N dressingse0
- Outcome
- Concentration of Mn in the graine0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- native Mn and Mn fertilizere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Concentration of Mn in the grain increased with increasing N dressings when native Mn and Mn fertilizer supplied this nutrient”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
N dressings did not affect grain Mn concentration in Mn-sprayed plants.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- N dressingse1
- Outcome
- Concentration of Mn in the graine1
- Direction
- unaffectede0
- Qualifier
- inplants sprayed with Mne0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“it was unaffected inplants sprayed with Mn”
e1“Concentration of Mn in the grain increased with increasing N dressings”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Superphosphate tended to lower grain Mn concentration.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Adding P as superphosphatee0
- Outcome
- concentration of Mn in the graine0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Qualifier
- native or applied Mne0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Adding P as superphosphate tended to lower the concentration of Mn in the grain when relying on native or applied Mn”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Superphosphate significantly increased wheat yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Adding P as superphosphatee1
- Outcome
- crop yielde0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“it significantly enhanced the crop yield and total Mn uptake”
e1“Adding P as superphosphate tended to lower”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Superphosphate significantly increased total Mn uptake.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Adding P as superphosphatee1
- Outcome
- total Mn uptakee0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“it significantly enhanced the crop yield and total Mn uptake”
e1“Adding P as superphosphate tended to lower”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Muriate of potash slightly reduced Mn uptake.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Applying K as muriate of potashe0
- Outcome
- Mn uptakee0
- Direction
- depressede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Applying K as muriate of potash slightly depressed Mn uptake by plants”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium had a stronger effect without P fertilizer.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Potassiume0
- Outcome
- more pronounced effecte0
- Qualifier
- absence of P fertilizere0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Potassium had a more pronounced effect in the absence of P fertilizer”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
N, P and K did not significantly alter straw Mn concentration.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- N, P and K fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- concentration of Mn in thestrawe0
- Direction
- not significantly affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The concentration of Mn in thestraw was not significantly affected by N, P and K fertilization”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
ammonium sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →potassium chloride · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →ammonium sulfate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →potassium · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →phosphorus · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 114 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
162 papers more in this group
See all 166 papers →phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
222 papers more in this group
See all 226 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 232 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
284 papers more in this group
See all 288 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.