Paper · 1973 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Effect of N, P and K fertilizers on the availability of native and applied manganese to wheat

B. Mishra; B. R. Tripathi

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The influence of three rates of each of N, P and K fertilizers on the availability of native and applied Mn to wheat was studied in a field experiment on an alluvial soil of the Indo-Gangetic plain. Increasing dressings of N as ammonium sulphate resulted in consistently higher yields and Mn uptake by the crop. Concentration of Mn in the grain increased with increasing N dressings when native Mn and Mn fertilizer supplied this nutrient but it was unaffected inplants sprayed with Mn. Adding P as superphosphate tended to lower the concentration of Mn in the grain when relying on native or applied Mn but it significantly enhanced the crop yield and total Mn uptake. Applying K as muriate of potash slightly depressed Mn uptake by plants. Potassium had a more pronounced effect in the absence of P fertilizer. The concentration of Mn in thestraw was not significantly affected by N, P and K fertilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N dressings raised wheat yield.

Treatment
Increasing dressings of N as ammonium sulphatee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing dressings of N as ammonium sulphate resulted in consistently higher yields and Mn uptake by the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–318 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N dressings raised wheat Mn uptake.

Treatment
Increasing dressings of N as ammonium sulphatee0
Outcome
Mn uptakee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing dressings of N as ammonium sulphate resulted in consistently higher yields and Mn uptake by the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–318 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain Mn concentration increased with N when Mn came from native or fertilizer sources.

Treatment
increasing N dressingse0
Outcome
Concentration of Mn in the graine0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
native Mn and Mn fertilizere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentration of Mn in the grain increased with increasing N dressings when native Mn and Mn fertilizer supplied this nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–446 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N dressings did not affect grain Mn concentration in Mn-sprayed plants.

Treatment
N dressingse1
Outcome
Concentration of Mn in the graine1
Direction
unaffectede0
Qualifier
inplants sprayed with Mne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was unaffected inplants sprayed with Mn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–493 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concentration of Mn in the grain increased with increasing N dressings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–390 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superphosphate tended to lower grain Mn concentration.

Treatment
Adding P as superphosphatee0
Outcome
concentration of Mn in the graine0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
native or applied Mne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding P as superphosphate tended to lower the concentration of Mn in the grain when relying on native or applied Mn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Superphosphate significantly increased wheat yield.

Treatment
Adding P as superphosphatee1
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it significantly enhanced the crop yield and total Mn uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–676 · show in text ↑
e1

“Adding P as superphosphate tended to lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Superphosphate significantly increased total Mn uptake.

Treatment
Adding P as superphosphatee1
Outcome
total Mn uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it significantly enhanced the crop yield and total Mn uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–676 · show in text ↑
e1

“Adding P as superphosphate tended to lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Muriate of potash slightly reduced Mn uptake.

Treatment
Applying K as muriate of potashe0
Outcome
Mn uptakee0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying K as muriate of potash slightly depressed Mn uptake by plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium had a stronger effect without P fertilizer.

Treatment
Potassiume0
Outcome
more pronounced effecte0
Qualifier
absence of P fertilizere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium had a more pronounced effect in the absence of P fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N, P and K did not significantly alter straw Mn concentration.

Treatment
N, P and K fertilizatione0
Outcome
concentration of Mn in thestrawe0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of Mn in thestraw was not significantly affected by N, P and K fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑

ammonium sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

potassium chloride · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

ammonium sulfate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

potassium · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 19 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

phosphorus · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 35 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 114 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 114 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 232 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 232 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.