Paper · 2011 · Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Academic Data Management System

Plant growth and protein ratio of spring sown chickpea with various combinations of rhizobium inoculation, nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation under rainfed condition

Mehmet Yağmur; Digdem Kaydan .

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In the present study, it was aimed to determine the effects of different combination of rhizobium inoculation, nitrogen application and irrigation on nodule dry weight, protein ratio and seed yield of spring sown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. cv ILC 482). The field experiment was carried out for two consecutive seasons in Van, Turkey in summer growing seasons of 1999 and 2000. All combinations influenced seed yield and yield components, therefore, there were highly significant differences in plant height (cm), number of branches per plant (plant(-1)), number of pods per plant (pods plant(-1)), number of seed per plant (seed plant(-1)), seed yield (kg ha(-1)), and protein ratio (%). The combination of nitrogen (60 kg N ha(-1)) and irrigation had the highest seed yield. Moreover, this combination was followed by the combination of inoculation and nitrogen (20 kg N ha(-1)) and irrigation (In-1+N-1+Ir-1). In contrast, the combination of uninoculation, no nitrogen application and nonirrigation (In-0+N-0+Ir-0) had the lowest seed yield. Moreover, the results obtained from the combination of inoculation, nitrogen (20 kg N ha(-1)) and irrigation was comparable to that of the combination of nitrogen (60 kg N ha(-1)) and irrigation for seed yield. Therefore, the combination of inoculation and nitrogen (20 kgN ha(-1)) and irrigation treatment can be use instead of the combination of nitrogen (60 kg N ha(-1)) and irrigation in chickpea production for achieving higher seed yield in rainfed condition. It is concluded, that nitrogen or inoculation has superior performance in seed yield and protein ratio under irrigation compared to those of nonirrigation conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment combinations significantly affected plant height, branches and pods per plant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
All combinationse0
Outcome
plant height (cm), number of branches per plant (plant(-1)), number of pods per plant (pods plant(-1))e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All combinations influenced seed yield and yield components, therefore, there were highly significant differences in plant height (cm), number of branches per plant (plant(-1)), number of pods per plant (pods plant(-1)), number of seed per plant (seed plant(-1)), seed yield (kg ha(-1)), and protein ratio (%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment combinations significantly affected seeds per plant, seed yield and protein ratio.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
All combinationse0
Outcome
number of seed per plant (seed plant(-1)), seed yield (kg ha(-1)), and protein ratio (%)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All combinations influenced seed yield and yield components, therefore, there were highly significant differences in plant height (cm), number of branches per plant (plant(-1)), number of pods per plant (pods plant(-1)), number of seed per plant (seed plant(-1)), seed yield (kg ha(-1)), and protein ratio (%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 60 kg N ha(-1) with irrigation produced the highest seed yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
nitrogen (60 kg N ha(-1)) and irrigatione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of nitrogen (60 kg N ha(-1)) and irrigation had the highest seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation, nitrogen at 20 kg N ha(-1), and irrigation ranked next for seed yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inoculation and nitrogen (20 kg N ha(-1)) and irrigatione0
Interactor
rhizobiumRhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Comparator
nitrogen (60 kg N ha(-1)) and irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, this combination was followed by the combination of inoculation and nitrogen (20 kg N ha(-1)) and irrigation (In-1+N-1+Ir-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–913 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination of nitrogen (60 kg N ha(-1)) and irrigation had the highest seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–54 · show in text ↑
t1

“rhizobium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uninoculated, unfertilized and nonirrigated chickpea had the lowest seed yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
uninoculation, no nitrogen application and nonirrigatione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, the combination of uninoculation, no nitrogen application and nonirrigation (In-0+N-0+Ir-0) had the lowest seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with 20 kg N ha(-1) and irrigation gave seed yield comparable to 60 kg N ha(-1) and irrigation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inoculation, nitrogen (20 kg N ha(-1)) and irrigatione0
Interactor
rhizobiumRhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
nitrogen (60 kg N ha(-1)) and irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, the results obtained from the combination of inoculation, nitrogen (20 kg N ha(-1)) and irrigation was comparable to that of the combination of nitrogen (60 kg N ha(-1)) and irrigation for seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–54 · show in text ↑
t1

“rhizobium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–93 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend inoculation with 20 kgN ha(-1) and irrigation as a replacement for 60 kg N ha(-1) and irrigation in rainfed chickpea production.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Interactor
rhizobiumRhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
inoculation and nitrogen (20 kgN ha(-1)) and irrigation treatmente0
Qualifier
rainfed conditione0
Comparator
nitrogen (60 kg N ha(-1)) and irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, the combination of inoculation and nitrogen (20 kgN ha(-1)) and irrigation treatment can be use instead of the combination of nitrogen (60 kg N ha(-1)) and irrigation in chickpea production for achieving higher seed yield in rainfed condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1511 · show in text ↑
t1

“rhizobium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen performed better for seed yield and protein ratio under irrigation than nonirrigation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
nitrogene0
Outcome
seed yield and protein ratioe0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
under irrigatione0
Comparator
nonirrigation conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is concluded, that nitrogen or inoculation has superior performance in seed yield and protein ratio under irrigation compared to those of nonirrigation conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1678 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation performed better for seed yield and protein ratio under irrigation than nonirrigation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
rhizobiumRhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
seed yield and protein ratioe0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
under irrigatione0
Comparator
nonirrigation conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is concluded, that nitrogen or inoculation has superior performance in seed yield and protein ratio under irrigation compared to those of nonirrigation conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1678 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–54 · show in text ↑
t1

“rhizobium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–93 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · Rhizobium · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 113 positive, 11 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

nitrogen · Rhizobium · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.