Abstract
Field experiments were conducted during 2013–2014 at Tashkent, Uzbekistan to evaluate the performance of chickpea variety “Jakhongir” with the variable proportion of nitrogen (N) and bio-fertilizer inoculation in the moderate saline (5.6 ± 0.6 dSm−1) soil condition. The studied treatments were No control (non-fertilized), N1 mineral-N (50 kg N ha−1), N2, mineral-N (75 kg N ha−1), N3, mineral-N (100 kg N ha−1) equivalent 0%, 50%, 75%, and 100% from recommended rate for chickpea, Rhizobium inoculation (Bio) + No control, Rhizobium inoculation (Bio) + N1, Rhizobium inoculation (Bio) + N2, and Rhizobium inoculation (Bio) + N3. Seed inoculation with Rhizobium was significantly superior over no inoculation treatments at all rate of N fertilization. The middle rate of N fertilization 75 kg N ha−1 combined with biofertilizer inoculation had of superior effect on chickpea, producing 73.2% more yield (1.68 Mg ha−1), oil, protein, and sugar content performed 16.4%; 15.0%, and 17.9% higher value, respectively, in comparison to control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium seed inoculation performed significantly better than no inoculation at all nitrogen rates.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Treatment
- Seed inoculation with Rhizobiume0
- Outcome
- significantly superiore0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- no inoculation treatmentse0
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed inoculation with Rhizobium was significantly superior over no inoculation treatments at all rate of N fertilization”
e1“performance of chickpea variety “Jakhongir””
Claim · model-written summary
The 75 kg N ha−1 plus biofertilizer treatment raised chickpea yield by 73.2% relative to control, reaching 1.68 Mg ha−1.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- 75 kg N ha−1 combined with biofertilizer inoculatione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 73.2%e0
- Qualifier
- 1.68 Mg ha−1e0
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The middle rate of N fertilization 75 kg N ha−1 combined with biofertilizer inoculation had of superior effect on chickpea, producing 73.2% more yield (1.68 Mg ha−1)”
e1“in comparison to control”
e2“Rhizobium inoculation (Bio) + No control”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment raised chickpea oil content by 16.4% relative to control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume3
- Treatment
- 75 kg N ha−1 combined with biofertilizer inoculatione1
- Outcome
- oile0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 16.4%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“oil, protein, and sugar content performed 16.4%; 15.0%, and 17.9% higher value, respectively, in comparison to control”
e1“75 kg N ha−1 combined with biofertilizer inoculation”
e2“Rhizobium inoculation (Bio) + No control”
e3“on chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment raised chickpea protein content by 15.0% relative to control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume3
- Treatment
- 75 kg N ha−1 combined with biofertilizer inoculatione1
- Outcome
- proteine0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 15.0%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“oil, protein, and sugar content performed 16.4%; 15.0%, and 17.9% higher value, respectively, in comparison to control”
e1“75 kg N ha−1 combined with biofertilizer inoculation”
e2“Rhizobium inoculation (Bio) + No control”
e3“on chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment raised chickpea sugar content by 17.9% relative to control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume3
- Treatment
- 75 kg N ha−1 combined with biofertilizer inoculatione1
- Outcome
- sugar contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 17.9%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“oil, protein, and sugar content performed 16.4%; 15.0%, and 17.9% higher value, respectively, in comparison to control”
e1“75 kg N ha−1 combined with biofertilizer inoculation”
e2“Rhizobium inoculation (Bio) + No control”
e3“on chickpea”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · Rhizobium · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →nitrogen · Rhizobium · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.