Paper · 2023 · Journal of Agricultural Research

EFFICIENCY OF NITROGEN FIXING, NODULATION FORMATION, PHOSPHATE SOLUBILIZING BACTERIA AND PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA ON YIELD OF CHICKPEA

Muhammad Ramzan; Muhammad Anayat Ullah; Mudassar Khaliq; et al.

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Chickpea is an important nodules producing pulse crop of Thal. To enhance nitrogen fixation for higher yield, the effect of bacterial strains on nodulation was evaluated for yield contributing traits of chickpea at Arid Zone Research Institute, Bhakkar, Pakistan during 2019-20. Six Rhizobium inoculations i.e. Providencia vermicola, Enterobacter cloacae, Bacillus mojavensis, Mesorhizobium ciceri-11, Mesorhizobium ciceri-1 and Bacillus subtilis were tested on two chickpea genotypes i.e. Bhakkar-2011 and Thal-2020. A consortium of six bacterial strains was applied at the time of sowing as a seed coating on a sandy soil. Results showed a significant increase in height/plant, nodulation, 100 grain weight, pods/plant and grain yield (kg/ha) due to bacterial inoculation. Nodules/plant were also increased from 44.08 to 76.16. Maximum number of nodules plant-1 were counted as 76.16 with 2.59 g fresh and 0.64 g dry weight per plant in treatment combination viz. Thal-2020 × RP08+RS14+RZ11 thus showing the specific symbiotic relationship among the genotypes and Rhizobium inoculum. In comparison to the control, the PSB, nitrogen-fixing bacteria and rhizobium inoculum results were 52 % increase in pods/ plant. The maximum number of pods/plant (116.00) and100 grain weight (27.73 g) were recorded in V1 × T1 (RP08+RS14+ RZ11). The weight of 100 grains was increased by 40% over the control. T1 had the highest 100 grain weight of 27.73 g, followed by V1 x T3 with a 100 grain weight of 26.22 g. PSB, nitrogen fixation bacteria and PSB inoculation substantially improved pulse crop 100 grain weight and yield. Thal-2020 had the highest grain yield of 3732 kg/ha, while V2 (Bhakkar-2011) had the lowest at 3516 kg/ha. Inoculation with rhizobium consortium improved grain yield by 30% (2617 to 3732 kg/ha). Hence, it was concluded that among all the treatments of Rhizobium consortium, N-fixing bacteria and PSB influenced a beneficial effect on chickpea grain yield quality and quantity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation significantly increased chickpea height, nodulation, 100 grain weight, pods per plant and grain yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
bacterial inoculatione0
Interactor
bacteriale0symbiont
Outcome
height/plant, nodulation, 100 grain weight, pods/plant and grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed a significant increase in height/plant, nodulation, 100 grain weight, pods/plant and grain yield (kg/ha) due to bacterial inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–774 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield contributing traits of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation increased chickpea nodules per plant from 44.08 to 76.16.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
bacterial inoculatione2
Interactor
bacteriale2symbiont
Outcome
Nodules/plante0
Direction
increasede0
Value
44.08 to 76.16e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nodules/plant were also increased from 44.08 to 76.16.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–829 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield contributing traits of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“bacterial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–773 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thal-2020 × RP08+RS14+RZ11 reached 76.16 nodules per plant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
Thal-2020e0
Treatment
RP08+RS14+RZ11e0
Outcome
nodules plant-1e0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
76.16e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum number of nodules plant-1 were counted as 76.16 with 2.59 g fresh and 0.64 g dry weight per plant in treatment combination viz. Thal-2020 × RP08+RS14+RZ11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–992 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield contributing traits of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–211 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thal-2020 × RP08+RS14+RZ11 had 2.59 g fresh nodule weight per plant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
Thal-2020e0
Treatment
RP08+RS14+RZ11e0
Outcome
freshe0
Value
2.59 ge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum number of nodules plant-1 were counted as 76.16 with 2.59 g fresh and 0.64 g dry weight per plant in treatment combination viz. Thal-2020 × RP08+RS14+RZ11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–992 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield contributing traits of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–211 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thal-2020 × RP08+RS14+RZ11 had 0.64 g dry nodule weight per plant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
Thal-2020e0
Treatment
RP08+RS14+RZ11e0
Outcome
dry weight per plante0
Value
0.64 ge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum number of nodules plant-1 were counted as 76.16 with 2.59 g fresh and 0.64 g dry weight per plant in treatment combination viz. Thal-2020 × RP08+RS14+RZ11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–992 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield contributing traits of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation increased chickpea pods per plant by 52% relative to control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
PSB, nitrogen-fixing bacteria and rhizobium inoculume0
Interactor
rhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
pods/ plante0
Direction
increasee0
Value
52 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison to the control, the PSB, nitrogen-fixing bacteria and rhizobium inoculum results were 52 % increase in pods/ plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1215 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield contributing traits of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–211 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V1 × T1 produced the maximum 116.00 pods per plant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
V1e0
Treatment
RP08+RS14+ RZ11e0
Outcome
pods/plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
116.00e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum number of pods/plant (116.00) and100 grain weight (27.73 g) were recorded in V1 × T1 (RP08+RS14+ RZ11).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1331 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield contributing traits of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–211 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V1 × T1 produced a 100 grain weight of 27.73 g.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
V1e0
Treatment
RP08+RS14+ RZ11e0
Outcome
100 grain weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
27.73 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum number of pods/plant (116.00) and100 grain weight (27.73 g) were recorded in V1 × T1 (RP08+RS14+ RZ11).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1331 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield contributing traits of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea 100 grain weight increased by 40% over control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
bacterial inoculatione2
Outcome
weight of 100 grainse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weight of 100 grains was increased by 40% over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1395 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield contributing traits of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“bacterial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–773 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V1 × T3 had a 100 grain weight of 26.22 g.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
V1e0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
100 grain weighte0
Value
26.22 ge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“V1 x T3 with a 100 grain weight of 26.22 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1498 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield contributing traits of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–211 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thal-2020 had the highest grain yield at 3732 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
Thal-2020e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3732 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thal-2020 had the highest grain yield of 3732 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1665 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield contributing traits of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–211 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bhakkar-2011 had the lowest grain yield at 3516 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Material
Bhakkar-2011e0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
loweste0
Value
3516 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“V2 (Bhakkar-2011) had the lowest at 3516 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1719 · show in text ↑
e1

“Thal-2020 had the highest grain yield of 3732 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1665 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield contributing traits of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium consortium inoculation increased chickpea grain yield by 30%, from 2617 to 3732 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Inoculation with rhizobium consortiume0
Interactor
rhizobium consortiume0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with rhizobium consortium improved grain yield by 30% (2617 to 3732 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1808 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield contributing traits of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–211 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Rhizobium · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 110 positive, 4 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

nitrogen · Rhizobium · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.