Paper · 2002 · Asian Journal of Plant Sciences

Effect of Various Irrigations Levels on Different Chickpea Varieties

Arif Ullah; Jehan Bakht .; Muhammad Shafi .; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In order to study the effect of different irrigations levels on chickpea, an experiment was conducted at Malakandher Research Farms, NWFP Agricultural University, Peshawar during 2000.Statistical analysis of the data showed that irrigations levels had a significant effect on emergence unit area -1, days to flowering, days to maturity, pods plant -1, grain yield and biological yield. Maximum emergence unit area -1, pods plant -1, plant height, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index in most of the cases were recorded in those plots, which were given two irrigations, when compared with other treatments. In case of varieties, maximum emergence unit area -1, pods plant -1, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index were recorded in NIFA-95 while CM-72 gave minimum emergence unit area -1, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index. The highest biological yield was obtained from plots treated three times, while the lowest biological yield was obtained from control plots. Maximum grain yield was produced by plots irrigated two times, while minimum grain yield was produced by control plots. Maximum harvest index was obtained from control plots and seeded with CM-72, while minimum harvest index was recorded in plots sown with CM-72 and applied three irrigations

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation level significantly affected chickpea emergence, flowering, maturity, pod number, grain yield and biological yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
irrigations levelse0
Outcome
emergence unit area -1, days to flowering, days to maturity, pods plant -1, grain yield and biological yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigations levels had a significant effect on emergence unit area -1, days to flowering, days to maturity, pods plant -1, grain yield and biological yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Various Irrigations Levels on Different Chickpea Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations generally maximized emergence, pod number, plant height, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index relative to other treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
two irrigationse0
Outcome
emergence unit area -1, pods plant -1, plant height, grain yield, biological yield and harvest indexe0
Direction
Maximume0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum emergence unit area -1, pods plant -1, plant height, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index in most of the cases were recorded in those plots, which were given two irrigations, when compared with other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Various Irrigations Levels on Different Chickpea Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NIFA-95 had maximum emergence, pod number, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index among varieties.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
NIFA-95e0
Outcome
emergence unit area -1, pods plant -1, grain yield, biological yield and harvest indexe0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum emergence unit area -1, pods plant -1, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index were recorded in NIFA-95”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Various Irrigations Levels on Different Chickpea Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CM-72 had minimum emergence, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index among varieties.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
CM-72e0
Outcome
emergence unit area -1, grain yield, biological yield and harvest indexe0
Direction
minimume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CM-72 gave minimum emergence unit area -1, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Various Irrigations Levels on Different Chickpea Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations gave the highest biological yield, versus the lowest under no irrigation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
treated three timese0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest biological yield was obtained from plots treated three times, while the lowest biological yield was obtained from control plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Various Irrigations Levels on Different Chickpea Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations gave maximum grain yield, versus minimum grain yield in control plots.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
irrigated two timese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum grain yield was produced by plots irrigated two times, while minimum grain yield was produced by control plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Various Irrigations Levels on Different Chickpea Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plots seeded with CM-72 had maximum harvest index.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
CM-72e0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
Maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum harvest index was obtained from control plots and seeded with CM-72”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Various Irrigations Levels on Different Chickpea Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CM-72 given three irrigations had minimum harvest index.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
CM-72e0
Treatment
three irrigationse0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum harvest index was recorded in plots sown with CM-72 and applied three irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Various Irrigations Levels on Different Chickpea Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 113 positive, 11 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.