Paper · 2013 · Food Science and Technology

Chemical evaluation and effect of bagging new peach varieties introduced in southern Minas Gerais - Brazil

Annete de Jesus Boari Lima; Ângelo Alberico Alvarenga; Marcelo Ribeiro Malta; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Brazilian peach production is insufficient for domestic supply. Aiming to increase production in the state of Minas Gerais, 16 new peach tree varieties were introduced in the Serra da Mantiqueira region and their fruit were analyzed for sugar, total phenol and total carotenoid contents by colorimetric methods, and for organic acid content by high-performance liquid chromatography. In addition, we examined the effect of fruit bagging on the levels of such constituents. To do so, the fruit of half the trees of each variety were bagged. The levels of sugars, phenols, carotenoids and organic acids are genotypic characteristics and significantly differed among varieties. Despite being a good form of fruit protection, providing better aspect and reducing the need for pesticides, bagging leads to lower contents of components such as sugars, phenols and organic acids in most varieties. However, it cannot be stated that this practice interferes with sensory characteristics. Knowledge of the chemical constituents of these new varieties allows determining those ideal for fresh consumption (e.g., "Maciel", "Diamante", "T. Beauty", "Ouromel 2" and "C.1056", among others) and those more suitable for industrial processing (e.g., "A. Gold", "C.1122" and "C.1050"), as well as those which serve both purposes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugars, phenols, carotenoids and organic acids differed significantly among varieties.

Material
varietiese0
Outcome
levels of sugars, phenols, carotenoids and organic acidse0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The levels of sugars, phenols, carotenoids and organic acids are genotypic characteristics and significantly differed among varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–673 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach tree varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging improved fruit appearance and reduced pesticide need.

Treatment
bagginge0
Outcome
better aspect and reducing the need for pesticidese1
Direction
reducinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bagging leads to lower contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–815 · show in text ↑
e1

“providing better aspect and reducing the need for pesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–782 · show in text ↑
e2

“fruit of half the trees of each variety were bagged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–538 · show in text ↑
e3

“peach tree varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging lowered sugars, phenols and organic acids in most varieties.

Treatment
bagginge0
Outcome
contents of components such as sugars, phenols and organic acidse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
in most varietiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bagging leads to lower contents of components such as sugars, phenols and organic acids in most varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–889 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach tree varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors could not conclude that bagging affects sensory traits.

Outcome
sensory characteristicse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it cannot be stated that this practice interferes with sensory characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach tree varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maciel, Diamante, T. Beauty, Ouromel 2 and C.1056 were identified as suitable for fresh use.

Material
"Maciel", "Diamante", "T. Beauty", "Ouromel 2" and "C.1056"e0
Outcome
ideal for fresh consumptione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ideal for fresh consumption (e.g., "Maciel", "Diamante", "T. Beauty", "Ouromel 2" and "C.1056"”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1161 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach tree varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. Gold, C.1122 and C.1050 were identified as more suitable for industrial processing.

Material
"A. Gold", "C.1122" and "C.1050"e0
Outcome
more suitable for industrial processinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more suitable for industrial processing (e.g., "A. Gold", "C.1122" and "C.1050"”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1266 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach tree varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–151 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · molecular: metabolites · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

trap barrier · quality: phytochemicals · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.