Paper · 2015 · Heilongjiang nongye kexue

Effect of Bagging on Fruit Quality of Hujingmilu Peach Variety

HU Liu-she

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to improve fruit quality of peach,taking Hujingmilu peach variety as test material,the effect of bagging on fruit quality of peach was studied.The results showed that the appearance quality of fruits,disease and insect fruit rate under bagging cultivation were significantly higher than that of the fruits(CK)under non-bagging cultivation;Appearance qualities of fruits bagged with yellow-colored bags and double-layer bags were better,disease and insect fruit rate bagged with double-layer bags was extremely significant lower than that of other kinds of bagging cultivation(P0.01).The soluble solid content of fruits under bagging cultivation were lower than that of the fruits(CK),but there was no significant difference in soluble solids content of fruits between CK and bagged with white-colored and double-layer bags(P0.05);Mean fruit weight of fruits bagged with double-layer bags and waxy fringe yellow-colored bags were higher.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging significantly improved fruit appearance versus no bagging.

Treatment
bagging cultivatione0
Outcome
appearance quality of fruitse0
Direction
significantly highere0
Comparator
non-bagging cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the appearance quality of fruits,disease and insect fruit rate under bagging cultivation were significantly higher than that of the fruits(CK)under non-bagging cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–347 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hujingmilu Peach Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging significantly increased the disease and insect fruit rate versus no bagging.

Treatment
bagging cultivatione0
Outcome
disease and insect fruit ratee0
Direction
significantly highere0
Comparator
non-bagging cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the appearance quality of fruits,disease and insect fruit rate under bagging cultivation were significantly higher than that of the fruits(CK)under non-bagging cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–347 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hujingmilu Peach Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow-colored and double-layer bags produced better fruit appearance.

Treatment
yellow-colored bags and double-layer bagse0
Outcome
Appearance qualities of fruitse0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Appearance qualities of fruits bagged with yellow-colored bags and double-layer bags were better”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–444 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hujingmilu Peach Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Double-layer bags greatly reduced disease and insect fruit rate versus other bag types.

Treatment
double-layer bagse0
Outcome
disease and insect fruit ratee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other kinds of bagging cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease and insect fruit rate bagged with double-layer bags was extremely significant lower than that of other kinds of bagging cultivation(P0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–591 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hujingmilu Peach Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging reduced soluble solids content versus no bagging.

Treatment
bagging cultivatione0
Outcome
soluble solid content of fruitse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
fruits(CK)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soluble solid content of fruits under bagging cultivation were lower than that of the fruits(CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hujingmilu Peach Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

White-colored and double-layer bag treatments did not differ significantly from CK in soluble solids.

Treatment
white-colored and double-layer bagse0
Outcome
soluble solids content of fruitse0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference in soluble solids content of fruits between CK and bagged with white-colored and double-layer bags(P0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hujingmilu Peach Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double-layer and waxy fringe yellow-colored bags increased mean fruit weight.

Treatment
double-layer bags and waxy fringe yellow-colored bagse0
Outcome
Mean fruit weighte0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean fruit weight of fruits bagged with double-layer bags and waxy fringe yellow-colored bags were higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hujingmilu Peach Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–62 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

trap barrier · molecular: metabolites · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.