Paper · 2007

Effects of bagging on the pericarpial coloration of juicy peach cultivars"Hongfeng"and"Qingshui"

Du JiHong; Zhengwen Ye

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The juicy peach cultivarsHongfengandQingshuiwere used as experimental materials and the effects of bagging at the hardening stage of fruit core on their pericarpial anthocyanin,chlorophyll,carote- noid and appearance were studied.The results showed that after bagging the pericarpial chlorophyll and carote- noid contents decreased quickly and the anthocyanin accumulation was inhibited obviously,which resulted in light fruit colour.But the treatment of bagging and then removing bags at fruit coloration could change the an- thocyanin content and increase the anthocyanin/(chlorophyll+carotenoid) ratio,which made fruit coloration bright and improved fruit appearance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging at the hardening stage of fruit core quickly decreased pericarp chlorophyll and carotenoid contents.

Material
Hongfeng and Qingshuie0
Organ / stage
pericarpe1
Treatment
bagging at the hardening stage of fruit coree0
Outcome
pericarpial chlorophylle1
Direction
decreased quicklye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The juicy peach cultivarsHongfengandQingshuiwere used as experimental materials and the effects of bagging at the hardening stage of fruit core on their pericarpial anthocyanin,chlorophyll,carote- noid and appearance were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–229 · show in text ↑
e1

“after bagging the pericarpial chlorophyll and carote- noid contents decreased quickly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–339 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging inhibited anthocyanin accumulation in the pericarp, resulting in light fruit colour.

Organ / stage
pericarpe0
Treatment
bagging at the hardening stage of fruit coree0
Outcome
anthocyanin accumulatione2
Direction
inhibited obviouslye2
Qualifier
light fruit coloure2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The juicy peach cultivarsHongfengandQingshuiwere used as experimental materials and the effects of bagging at the hardening stage of fruit core on their pericarpial anthocyanin,chlorophyll,carote- noid and appearance were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–229 · show in text ↑
e2

“the anthocyanin accumulation was inhibited obviously,which resulted in light fruit colour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–433 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging and then removing bags at fruit coloration could increase the anthocyanin/(chlorophyll+carotenoid) ratio.

Material
Hongfeng and Qingshuie0
Treatment
removing bags at fruit coloratione3
Outcome
anthocyanin/(chlorophyll+carotenoid) ratioe3
Direction
increasee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The juicy peach cultivarsHongfengandQingshuiwere used as experimental materials and the effects of bagging at the hardening stage of fruit core on their pericarpial anthocyanin,chlorophyll,carote- noid and appearance were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–229 · show in text ↑
e3

“the treatment of bagging and then removing bags at fruit coloration could change the an- thocyanin content and increase the anthocyanin/(chlorophyll+carotenoid) ratio,which made fruit coloration bright and improved fruit appearance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing bags at fruit coloration made fruit coloration bright and improved fruit appearance.

Treatment
removing bags at fruit coloratione3
Outcome
fruit appearancee3
Direction
improvede3
Qualifier
fruit coloration brighte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The juicy peach cultivarsHongfengandQingshuiwere used as experimental materials and the effects of bagging at the hardening stage of fruit core on their pericarpial anthocyanin,chlorophyll,carote- noid and appearance were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–229 · show in text ↑
e3

“the treatment of bagging and then removing bags at fruit coloration could change the an- thocyanin content and increase the anthocyanin/(chlorophyll+carotenoid) ratio,which made fruit coloration bright and improved fruit appearance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–669 · show in text ↑

in vitro · quality: phytochemicals · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

trap barrier · quality: phytochemicals · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.