Paper · 2010 · Journal of Food Science

Effects of Bagging on Volatiles and Polyphenols in “Wanmi” Peaches during Endocarp Hardening and Final Fruit Rapid Growth Stages

Yiju Wang; Chunxiang Yang; Chunyan Liu; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
36
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fruits of the late-ripening peach cultivar "Wanmi" were bagged at the early period of fruit endocarp hardening, and the bags were removed 1 wk before maturity harvest. The effects of bagging on volatile compounds and polyphenols were studied. Total volatiles and the sum of C(6) compounds, esters from bagged fruits were significantly lower than from nonbagged fruits from the beginning of the final rapid fruit growth stage to maturity. As the most dominant compounds of C(6) compounds and esters, the lower contents of hexanal, trans-2-hexenal, hexyl acetate, cis-3-hexenyl acetate, and trans-2-hexenyl acetate attributed to the lower content of C(6) compounds and esters in bagged fruit. γ-Hexalactone and δ-decalactone were produced earlier in bagged fruits than in nonbagged ones, suggesting that bagging accelerates fruit maturity. Level of γ-decalactone in bagged fruits was significantly lower than in nonbagged fruits at 159 days after full blossom (DAFB), so did δ-decalactone at 166 DAFB. Bagging did not affect chlorogenic acid and catechol contents of either fruit peel or flesh, nor did it affect contents of keracyanin or quercetin-3-rutinoside in fruit flesh during fruit development. However, keracyanin and quercetin-3-rutinoside levels were significantly reduced in bagged fruit peels before ripening compared to nonbagged fruit peels. Considering the large changes in volatiles and polyphenols, the key stage for "Wanmi" fruit maturity was between 126 DAFB and 147 DAFB, about 1 mo ahead of maturity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagged peaches had significantly lower total volatiles, C(6) compounds and esters from rapid fruit growth to maturity.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Material
Wanmit0
Treatment
bagged fruitse0
Outcome
Total volatiles and the sum of C(6) compounds, esterse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
from the beginning of the final rapid fruit growth stage to maturitye0
Comparator
nonbagged fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total volatiles and the sum of C(6) compounds, esters from bagged fruits were significantly lower than from nonbagged fruits from the beginning of the final rapid fruit growth stage to maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–436 · show in text ↑
t0

““Wanmi” Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging lowered the five named dominant C(6) compounds and esters.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
bagged fruite0
Outcome
contents of hexanal, trans-2-hexenal, hexyl acetate, cis-3-hexenyl acetate, and trans-2-hexenyl acetatee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lower contents of hexanal, trans-2-hexenal, hexyl acetate, cis-3-hexenyl acetate, and trans-2-hexenyl acetate attributed to the lower content of C(6) compounds and esters in bagged fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging led to earlier production of γ-hexalactone and δ-decalactone.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
bagged fruitse0
Outcome
γ-Hexalactone and δ-decalactonee0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
nonbagged onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“γ-Hexalactone and δ-decalactone were produced earlier in bagged fruits than in nonbagged ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagged fruit had significantly lower γ-decalactone at 159 DAFB.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
bagged fruitse0
Outcome
Level of γ-decalactonee0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
159 days after full blossom (DAFB)e0
Comparator
nonbagged fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Level of γ-decalactone in bagged fruits was significantly lower than in nonbagged fruits at 159 days after full blossom (DAFB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging did not change chlorogenic acid and catechol in peel or flesh.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Organ / stage
fruit peel or fleshe0
Treatment
Bagginge0
Outcome
chlorogenic acid and catechol contentse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bagging did not affect chlorogenic acid and catechol contents of either fruit peel or flesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging did not change keracyanin or quercetin-3-rutinoside in flesh.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Organ / stage
fruit fleshe0
Treatment
Bagginge1
Outcome
contents of keracyanin or quercetin-3-rutinosidee0
Direction
nor did it affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nor did it affect contents of keracyanin or quercetin-3-rutinoside in fruit flesh during fruit development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1199 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bagging did not affect chlorogenic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging significantly reduced keracyanin and quercetin-3-rutinoside in peels before ripening.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
bagged fruit peelse0
Outcome
keracyanin and quercetin-3-rutinoside levelse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
before ripeninge0
Comparator
nonbagged fruit peelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“keracyanin and quercetin-3-rutinoside levels were significantly reduced in bagged fruit peels before ripening compared to nonbagged fruit peels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors identified 126 to 147 DAFB as a key maturity stage for Wanmi fruit.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Material
Wanmie0
Outcome
key stage for "Wanmi" fruit maturitye0
Value
between 126 DAFB and 147 DAFBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the key stage for "Wanmi" fruit maturity was between 126 DAFB and 147 DAFB, about 1 mo ahead of maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1519 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · molecular: metabolites · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.