Paper · 1998 · Phytopathology

Systemic Induction of Peroxidases, 1,3-β-Glucanases, Chitinases, and Resistance in Bean Plants by BinucleateRhizoctoniaSpecies

L. Xue; P. M. Charest; S. H. Jabaji-Hare

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
120
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Inoculation of bean hypocotyls with a nonpathogenic binucleate Rhizoctonia (BNR) species induced systemic resistance and protection of the roots and cotyledons to later challenge with the root rot pathogen Rhizoctonia solani or the anthracnose pathogen Colletotrichum lindemuthianum. Bean seedlings that were treated with BNR 48 h prior to their challenge with R. solani or C. lindemuthianum had few necrotic lesions and reduced disease severity as compared with seedlings not treated with BNR. Treatment with BNR 48 h prior to their challenge also elicited a significant and systemic increase in all cellular fractions of peroxidases, 1,3-beta-glucanases, and chitinases compared with the diseased and control plants. Compared with control plants, total peroxidases and glucanases increased twofold and eightfold, respectively, in all protected bean tissues. BNR 232-CG could not be recovered from the challenged hypocotyls or cotyledons, indicating that there was no contact between the inducer and the pathogen. Both the 1,3-beta-glucanases and the peroxidases were positively correlated with induced resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Binucleate Rhizoctonia inoculation induced systemic resistance against Rhizoctonia solani.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
Inoculation of bean hypocotyls with a nonpathogenic binucleate Rhizoctonia (BNR) speciese0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
binucleate Rhizoctonia (BNR) speciese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
systemic resistance and protection of the roots and cotyledonse0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of bean hypocotyls with a nonpathogenic binucleate Rhizoctonia (BNR) species induced systemic resistance and protection of the roots and cotyledons to later challenge with the root rot pathogen Rhizoctonia solani or the anthracnose pathogen Colletotrichum lindemuthianum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Binucleate Rhizoctonia inoculation induced protection against Colletotrichum lindemuthianum.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
Inoculation of bean hypocotyls with a nonpathogenic binucleate Rhizoctonia (BNR) speciese0
Interactor
Colletotrichum lindemuthianumColletotrichum lindemuthianume0pathogen
Second interactor
binucleate Rhizoctonia (BNR) speciese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
systemic resistance and protection of the roots and cotyledonse0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum lindemuthianum
Colletotrichum lindemuthianum · InteractorDavid B. Langston, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of bean hypocotyls with a nonpathogenic binucleate Rhizoctonia (BNR) species induced systemic resistance and protection of the roots and cotyledons to later challenge with the root rot pathogen Rhizoctonia solani or the anthracnose pathogen Colletotrichum lindemuthianum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BNR treated seedlings had few necrotic lesions and reduced disease severity after pathogen challenge.

Taxon
Beane0
Treatment
treated with BNR 48 h priore0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
BNRe0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
necrotic lesions and reduced disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
seedlings not treated with BNRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bean seedlings that were treated with BNR 48 h prior to their challenge with R. solani or C. lindemuthianum had few necrotic lesions and reduced disease severity as compared with seedlings not treated with BNR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BNR treatment increased peroxidases, glucanases and chitinases systemically relative to diseased and control plants.

Taxon
Bean Plantst0
Treatment
Treatment with BNR 48 h prior to their challengee0
Interactor
BNRe0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
peroxidases, 1,3-beta-glucanases, and chitinasese0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
diseased and control plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with BNR 48 h prior to their challenge also elicited a significant and systemic increase in all cellular fractions of peroxidases, 1,3-beta-glucanases, and chitinases compared with the diseased and control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bean Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total peroxidases increased twofold in protected bean tissues.

Taxon
beane0
Outcome
total peroxidasese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
twofolde0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“total peroxidases and glucanases increased twofold and eightfold, respectively, in all protected bean tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bean Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total glucanases increased eightfold in protected bean tissues.

Taxon
beane0
Outcome
glucanasese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
eightfolde0

Verbatim

e0

“total peroxidases and glucanases increased twofold and eightfold, respectively, in all protected bean tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–868 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BNR 232-CG was not recovered from challenged hypocotyls or cotyledons.

Taxon
Bean Plantst0
Organ / stage
hypocotyls or cotyledonse0
Interactor
BNR 232-CGe0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
BNR 232-CG could not be recoverede0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“BNR 232-CG could not be recovered from the challenged hypocotyls or cotyledons, indicating that there was no contact between the inducer and the pathogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bean Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–94 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucanases and peroxidases were positively correlated with induced resistance.

Taxon
Bean Plantst0
Gene
1,3-beta-glucanases and the peroxidasese0
Outcome
induced resistancee0
Direction
positivelye0

Verbatim

e0

“Both the 1,3-beta-glucanases and the peroxidases were positively correlated with induced resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bean Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–94 · show in text ↑

Rhizoctonia · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Rhizoctonia · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Colletotrichum lindemuthianum · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

infection · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 28 positive, 40 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.