Paper · 2013 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Application of endophytic bacteria for controlling anthracnose disease ( Colletotrichum lindemuthianum ) on bean plants

Masoomeh Gholami; Reza Khakvar; Naser AliasgarZad

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Over 100 endophytic bacterial isolates were isolated from surface-sterilised roots of the Fabaceae family in East Azerbaijan farms. These isolates were screened for their in vitro biocontrol activity against Colletotrichum lindemuthianum by dual culture technique using potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium. Eight bacterial isolates (Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis, Bacillus atrophaeus, B. tequilensis, B. subtilis subsp. spizizenii, Streptomyces cyaneofuscatus, S. flavofuscus, S. parvus, S. acrimycini) showed promising inhibition on mycelial growth of C. lindemuthianum , and thus, these isolates were selected for greenhouse experiments. The disease control rate using these selected endophytic bacteria was varied from 40 to 76.80% in greenhouse without any negative effects on different growth performance, suggesting that these selected endophytic bacteria are potential to be developed as biocontrol agents.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight endophytic bacterial isolates showed promising inhibition of mycelial growth of Colletotrichum lindemuthianum in vitro in dual culture.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
Eight bacterial isolatese2
Interactor
Colletotrichum lindemuthianumColletotrichum lindemuthianume1pathogen
Second interactor
bacterial isolatese2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growth of C. lindemuthianume2
Direction
inhibitione2
Setting
in vitroe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum lindemuthianum
Colletotrichum lindemuthianum · InteractorDavid B. Langston, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“These isolates were screened for their in vitro biocontrol activity against Colletotrichum lindemuthianum by dual culture technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–263 · show in text ↑
e2

“Eight bacterial isolates (Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis, Bacillus atrophaeus, B. tequilensis, B. subtilis subsp. spizizenii, Streptomyces cyaneofuscatus, S. flavofuscus, S. parvus, S. acrimycini) showed promising inhibition on mycelial growth of C. lindemuthianum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected endophytic bacteria gave disease control rates of 40 to 76.80% against anthracnose of bean in the greenhouse.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
selected endophytic bacteriae3
Interactor
Colletotrichum lindemuthianumColletotrichum lindemuthianumt1pathogen
Second interactor
endophytic bacteriae3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease control ratee3
Value
40 to 76.80%e3
Setting
greenhousee3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum lindemuthianum
Colletotrichum lindemuthianum · InteractorDavid B. Langston, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–119 · show in text ↑
t1

“anthracnose disease ( Colletotrichum lindemuthianum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–104 · show in text ↑
e3

“The disease control rate using these selected endophytic bacteria was varied from 40 to 76.80% in greenhouse without any negative effects on different growth performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected endophytic bacteria had no negative effects on bean growth performance in the greenhouse.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
selected endophytic bacteriae3
Outcome
different growth performancee3
Qualifier
without any negative effectse3
Setting
greenhousee3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“on bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–119 · show in text ↑
e3

“The disease control rate using these selected endophytic bacteria was varied from 40 to 76.80% in greenhouse without any negative effects on different growth performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–811 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that the selected endophytic bacteria are potential biocontrol agents to be developed.

Taxon
beant0
Outcome
potential to be developed as biocontrol agentse4

Verbatim

t0

“on bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–119 · show in text ↑
e4

“suggesting that these selected endophytic bacteria are potential to be developed as biocontrol agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–914 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

126 papers: 106 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 106 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

inoculation · Colletotrichum lindemuthianum · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.