Paper · 1999 · Crop Science

Agronomic Performance of Root Chicory, Jerusalem Artichoke, and Sugarbeet in Stress and Nonstress Environments

Siegfried Schittenhelm

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
78
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction of the fructan crops root chicory ( Cichorium intybus L.; RC) and Jerusalem artichoke ( Helianthus tuberosus L.; JA) into agricultural production systems is desirable to diversify crop rotation. Field experiments were conducted to compare the agronomic performance of RC and JA with sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.; SB). One set of cultivars during 1995, 1996, and 1997 and an additional set in 1997 were grown on a sandy loam soil (Haplic Luvisol) at Braunschweig, Germany. Crops were cultivated with and without supplemental irrigation, complete and no weed control (1995 and 1996), and N fertilization rates of 0, 60, and 120 kg ha −1 Severe water stress caused significant but similar storage organ yield losses in all crops, whereas mild water stress mainly affected JA yields. Averaged across years and N levels, storage organ yield losses through weed competition under irrigation amounted to 70, 47, and 8% in SB, RC, and JA, respectively. Averaged across years, in the absence of water and weed stress, SB, RC, and JA at their respective optimal N levels gave root and tuber dry matter yields of 14.8, 15.0, and 11.5 Mg ha −1 , and sugar yields of 11.5, 11.2, and 8.1 Mg ha −1 , respectively. Maximal SB and JA yields generally were achieved at the highest N rate, while RC peak yields were attained at 60 kg N ha −1 With the same amount of N taken up, RC in 1995 and SB in 1996 and 1997 produced the highest sugar yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe water stress caused significant, similar storage-organ yield losses in all three crops.

Taxon
root chicoryt0
Treatment
Severe water stresse0
Outcome
storage organ yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Severe water stress caused significant but similar storage organ yield losses in all crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root Chicory, Jerusalem Artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mild water stress mainly affected Jerusalem artichoke yield.

Taxon
Jerusalem ArtichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
mild water stresse0
Outcome
JA yieldse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mild water stress mainly affected JA yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem Artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under irrigation, weed competition caused 70% storage-organ yield loss in sugar beet.

Treatment
weed competitione0
Outcome
storage organ yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Value
70e0
Qualifier
under irrigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“storage organ yield losses through weed competition under irrigation amounted to 70, 47, and 8% in SB, RC, and JA, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under irrigation, weed competition caused 47% storage-organ yield loss in root chicory.

Taxon
Root Chicoryt0
Treatment
weed competitione0
Outcome
storage organ yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Value
47e0
Qualifier
under irrigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“storage organ yield losses through weed competition under irrigation amounted to 70, 47, and 8% in SB, RC, and JA, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root Chicory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under irrigation, weed competition caused 8% storage-organ yield loss in Jerusalem artichoke.

Taxon
Jerusalem ArtichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
weed competitione0
Outcome
storage organ yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Value
8%e0
Qualifier
under irrigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“storage organ yield losses through weed competition under irrigation amounted to 70, 47, and 8% in SB, RC, and JA, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem Artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without water or weed stress, sugar beet produced 14.8 Mg ha−1 dry matter yield at its optimal nitrogen level.

Outcome
root and tuber dry matter yieldse0
Value
14.8e0
Qualifier
respective optimal N levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SB, RC, and JA at their respective optimal N levels gave root and tuber dry matter yields of 14.8, 15.0, and 11.5 Mg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1154 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without water or weed stress, root chicory produced 15.0 Mg ha−1 dry matter yield at its optimal nitrogen level.

Taxon
Root Chicoryt0
Outcome
root and tuber dry matter yieldse0
Value
15.0e0

Verbatim

e0

“SB, RC, and JA at their respective optimal N levels gave root and tuber dry matter yields of 14.8, 15.0, and 11.5 Mg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1154 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root Chicory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without water or weed stress, Jerusalem artichoke produced 11.5 Mg ha−1 dry matter yield at its optimal nitrogen level.

Taxon
Jerusalem ArtichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Outcome
root and tuber dry matter yieldse0
Value
11.5 Mg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SB, RC, and JA at their respective optimal N levels gave root and tuber dry matter yields of 14.8, 15.0, and 11.5 Mg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1154 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem Artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet produced 11.5 Mg ha−1 sugar yield at its optimal nitrogen level.

Outcome
sugar yieldse0
Value
11.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar yields of 11.5, 11.2, and 8.1 Mg ha −1 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root chicory produced 11.2 Mg ha−1 sugar yield at its optimal nitrogen level.

Taxon
Root Chicoryt0
Outcome
sugar yieldse0
Value
11.2e0

Verbatim

e0

“sugar yields of 11.5, 11.2, and 8.1 Mg ha −1 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root Chicory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jerusalem artichoke produced 8.1 Mg ha−1 sugar yield at its optimal nitrogen level.

Taxon
Jerusalem ArtichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Outcome
sugar yieldse0
Value
8.1 Mg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar yields of 11.5, 11.2, and 8.1 Mg ha −1 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem Artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet generally reached maximal yield at the highest nitrogen rate.

Treatment
highest N ratee0
Outcome
Maximal SB and JA yieldse0
Direction
Maximale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximal SB and JA yields generally were achieved at the highest N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jerusalem artichoke generally reached maximal yield at the highest nitrogen rate.

Taxon
Jerusalem ArtichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
highest N ratee0
Outcome
Maximal SB and JA yieldse0
Direction
Maximale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximal SB and JA yields generally were achieved at the highest N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem Artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root chicory reached peak yield at 60 kg N ha−1.

Taxon
Root Chicoryt0
Treatment
60 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
peak yieldse0
Direction
peake0

Verbatim

e0

“RC peak yields were attained at 60 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root Chicory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At equal nitrogen uptake, root chicory had the highest sugar yield in 1995.

Taxon
Root Chicoryt0
Outcome
highest sugar yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
same amount of N taken upe0

Verbatim

e0

“With the same amount of N taken up, RC in 1995 and SB in 1996 and 1997 produced the highest sugar yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root Chicory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At equal nitrogen uptake, sugar beet had the highest sugar yield in 1996 and 1997.

Outcome
highest sugar yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
same amount of N taken upe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the same amount of N taken up, RC in 1995 and SB in 1996 and 1997 produced the highest sugar yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

drought · yield · Cichorium intybus (chicory)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

competition · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.