Paper · 1997 · Plant Pathology

Influence of field burning and soil treatments on growth of wheat after Kentucky bluegrass, and effect of Rhizoctonia cerealis on bluegrass emergence and growth

M. MAZZOLA; T. E. JOHNSON; R. J. COOK

15
claims
16
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Studies were conducted to assess the importance of soil‐borne pathogens as impediments to the production of direct‐drilled wheat following Kentucky bluegrass in rotation. Bluegrass sods were collected as cores from commercial seed fields in October (after open‐field burning) and in December and March (after exposure to normal freezing and thawing), treated with glyphosate after a 2‐ to 3‐week period of green‐up in the glasshouse, and then planted to wheat 21 days later. Wheat seedlings in the 3‐ to 4‐leaf stage were stunted and spindly in either burned or nonburned sods collected in October, but grew significantly better in burned than nonburned sods collected in December and March. Fumigation (methyl bromide), simulated tillage, and application of metalaxyl as a drench, singly or as combined treatments, improved the growth of wheat in nonburned sods. Growth of wheat in nontreated burned sods collected after frost had penetrated the upper portions was equivalent to that in fumigated sods. Experimental freezing at −20°C for up to 96 h, of burned and nonburned sods collected in October, followed by thawing also improved the growth of wheat subsequently sown directly into these sods. The stunted and spindly seedlings had roots girdled and severed by lesions typical of Rhizoctonia root rot. Isolates of Rhizoctonia cerealis were recovered from these roots and caused poor seedling emergence and stunted root and shoot growth of both wheat and bluegrass. The results suggest that both R. cerealis and Pythium spp. are potentially important soil‐borne pathogens of wheat when following Kentucky bluegrass in rotation and that burning done routinely to improve the yield of bluegrass seed can also reduce the potential for damage caused by Rhizoctonia and Pythium root rots of wheat seeded directly into bluegrass sod.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat seedlings were stunted and spindly in October sods regardless of burning.

Organ / stage
3‐ to 4‐leaf stagee0
Outcome
stunted and spindlye0
Qualifier
either burned or nonburned sods collected in Octobere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat seedlings in the 3‐ to 4‐leaf stage were stunted and spindly in either burned or nonburned sods collected in October, but grew significantly better in burned than nonburned sods collected in December and March.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grew significantly better in burned than nonburned December and March sods.

Treatment
burnede0
Outcome
grew significantly bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
collected in December and Marche0
Comparator
nonburned sodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat seedlings in the 3‐ to 4‐leaf stage were stunted and spindly in either burned or nonburned sods collected in October, but grew significantly better in burned than nonburned sods collected in December and March.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl bromide fumigation improved wheat growth in nonburned sods.

Treatment
Fumigation (methyl bromide)e0
Outcome
growth of wheate0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
nonburned sodse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fumigation (methyl bromide), simulated tillage, and application of metalaxyl as a drench, singly or as combined treatments, improved the growth of wheat in nonburned sods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated tillage improved wheat growth in nonburned sods.

Treatment
simulated tillagee0
Outcome
growth of wheate0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
nonburned sodse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fumigation (methyl bromide), simulated tillage, and application of metalaxyl as a drench, singly or as combined treatments, improved the growth of wheat in nonburned sods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metalaxyl drenching improved wheat growth in nonburned sods.

Treatment
application of metalaxyl as a drenche0
Outcome
growth of wheate0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
nonburned sodse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fumigation (methyl bromide), simulated tillage, and application of metalaxyl as a drench, singly or as combined treatments, improved the growth of wheat in nonburned sods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil treatments improved wheat growth in nonburned sods.

Treatment
combined treatmentse0
Outcome
growth of wheate0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
nonburned sodse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fumigation (methyl bromide), simulated tillage, and application of metalaxyl as a drench, singly or as combined treatments, improved the growth of wheat in nonburned sods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat growth in untreated burned sods exposed to frost equalled growth in fumigated sods.

Treatment
nontreated burned sodse0
Outcome
Growth of wheate0
Direction
equivalente0
Qualifier
after frost had penetrated the upper portionse0
Comparator
fumigated sodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of wheat in nontreated burned sods collected after frost had penetrated the upper portions was equivalent to that in fumigated sods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1003 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freezing and thawing burned October sods improved subsequently sown wheat growth.

Treatment
Experimental freezing at −20°C for up to 96 he0
Outcome
growth of wheate0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
burnede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experimental freezing at −20°C for up to 96 h, of burned and nonburned sods collected in October, followed by thawing also improved the growth of wheat subsequently sown directly into these sods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freezing and thawing nonburned October sods improved subsequently sown wheat growth.

Treatment
Experimental freezing at −20°C for up to 96 he0
Outcome
growth of wheate0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
nonburned sods collected in Octobere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experimental freezing at −20°C for up to 96 h, of burned and nonburned sods collected in October, followed by thawing also improved the growth of wheat subsequently sown directly into these sods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1199 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stunted wheat seedlings had roots girdled and severed by lesions typical of Rhizoctonia root rot.

Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae0pathogen
Outcome
roots girdled and severede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The stunted and spindly seedlings had roots girdled and severed by lesions typical of Rhizoctonia root rot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia cerealis isolates were recovered from affected roots.

Taxon
Rhizoctonia cerealisCeratobasidium cerealee0
Interactor
wheatTriticum aestivume0host
Outcome
recovered from these rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ceratobasidium cereale
Ceratobasidium cereale · TaxonElizabeth Bush, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isolates of Rhizoctonia cerealis were recovered from these roots and caused poor seedling emergence and stunted root and shoot growth of both wheat and bluegrass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia cerealis caused poor emergence and stunted root and shoot growth in wheat.

Treatment
Isolates of Rhizoctonia cerealise0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia cerealisCeratobasidium cerealee0pathogen
Outcome
poor seedling emergence and stunted root and shoot growthe0
Direction
poore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ceratobasidium cereale
Ceratobasidium cereale · InteractorElizabeth Bush, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isolates of Rhizoctonia cerealis were recovered from these roots and caused poor seedling emergence and stunted root and shoot growth of both wheat and bluegrass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia cerealis caused poor emergence and stunted root and shoot growth in bluegrass.

Taxon
bluegrassPoae0
Treatment
Isolates of Rhizoctonia cerealise0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia cerealisCeratobasidium cerealee0pathogen
Outcome
poor seedling emergence and stunted root and shoot growthe0
Direction
poore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa
Poa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ceratobasidium cereale
Ceratobasidium cereale · InteractorElizabeth Bush, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isolates of Rhizoctonia cerealis were recovered from these roots and caused poor seedling emergence and stunted root and shoot growth of both wheat and bluegrass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1470 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. cerealis and Pythium are potentially important wheat pathogens after Kentucky bluegrass.

Interactor
R. cerealisCeratobasidium cerealee0pathogen
Second interactor
Pythium spp.Pythiume0pathogen
Outcome
potentially important soil‐borne pathogense0
Qualifier
when following Kentucky bluegrass in rotatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ceratobasidium cereale
Ceratobasidium cereale · InteractorElizabeth Bush, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pythium
Pythium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Doc. RNDr. Josef Reischig, CSc. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results suggest that both R. cerealis and Pythium spp. are potentially important soil‐borne pathogens of wheat when following Kentucky bluegrass in rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1631 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Routine burning can reduce Rhizoctonia and Pythium root rot damage in wheat directly seeded into bluegrass sod.

Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae0pathogen
Second interactor
PythiumPythiume0pathogen
Outcome
burning done routinelye0
Qualifier
seeded directly into bluegrass sode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pythium
Pythium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Doc. RNDr. Josef Reischig, CSc. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“burning done routinely to improve the yield of bluegrass seed can also reduce the potential for damage caused by Rhizoctonia and Pythium root rots of wheat seeded directly into bluegrass sod.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1641–1832 · show in text ↑

bromomethane · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fire · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

solarization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

cold · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

88 papers: 34 positive, 54 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

207 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

307 papers: 273 positive, 34 negative or no effect

272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

303 papers more in this group

See all 307 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.