Abstract
Cold aqueous extracts of wheat straw, that had been rotted for periods up to 6 weeks, have been shown to inhibit the growth of wheat and oats grown under aseptic conditions. The degree of inhibition varied with the time of rotting and was at a maximum after 2–6 days. Roots were far more sensitive than shoots to inhibitors. Wheat shoots were inhibited more than oat shoots, but oat roots were inhibited more than wheat roots. Prolonged storage of straw or weathering of wheat stubble in the field reduced this inhibitory effect
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Rotted wheat straw extract inhibited wheat growth under aseptic conditions.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- Cold aqueous extracts of wheat strawe0
- Outcome
- growth of wheate0
- Direction
- inhibite0
- Setting
- aseptic conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Cold aqueous extracts of wheat straw, that had been rotted for periods up to 6 weeks, have been shown to inhibit the growth of wheat and oats grown under aseptic conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Rotted wheat straw extract inhibited oat growth under aseptic conditions.
- Taxon
- oats
Avena sativae0 - Treatment
- Cold aqueous extracts of wheat strawe0
- Outcome
- growth of wheat and oatse0
- Direction
- inhibite0
- Setting
- aseptic conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Cold aqueous extracts of wheat straw, that had been rotted for periods up to 6 weeks, have been shown to inhibit the growth of wheat and oats grown under aseptic conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Inhibition varied with rotting time and peaked after 2–6 days.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- time of rottinge0
- Outcome
- degree of inhibitione0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 2–6 dayse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“wheat straw on seedling growth”
e0“The degree of inhibition varied with the time of rotting and was at a maximum after 2–6 days”
Claim · model-written summary
Roots were more sensitive to inhibitors than shoots.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Organ / stage
- Rootse0
- Outcome
- sensitivee0
- Direction
- far moree0
- Comparator
- shootse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“wheat straw on seedling growth”
e0“Roots were far more sensitive than shoots to inhibitors”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat shoots were inhibited more than oat shoots.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Organ / stage
- shootse0
- Outcome
- shoots were inhibitede0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- oat shootse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Wheat shoots were inhibited more than oat shoots, but oat roots were inhibited more than wheat roots”
Claim · model-written summary
Oat roots were inhibited more than wheat roots.
- Taxon
- oat
Avena sativae0 - Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Outcome
- roots were inhibitede0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- wheat rootse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Wheat shoots were inhibited more than oat shoots, but oat roots were inhibited more than wheat roots”
Claim · model-written summary
Prolonged straw storage or field weathering reduced inhibitory effects.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Prolonged storage of straw or weathering of wheat stubblee0
- Outcome
- inhibitory effecte0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Setting
- fielde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“wheat straw on seedling growth”
e0“Prolonged storage of straw or weathering of wheat stubble in the field reduced this inhibitory effect”
The same questions in other papers
cold · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →botanical · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →cold · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
84 papers more in this group
See all 88 papers →botanical · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
228 papers in the same direction as this paper · 206 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
431 papers more in this group
See all 435 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.