Paper · 1995 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effects of fertilizer and stubble burning on downy brome competition in winter wheat

Paul E. Rasmussen

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
28
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Increased downy brome (Bromus tectorum) infestation is one of the dominant impediments to adoption of conservation tillage. Surface residues often increase grassy weed competition and lower the yield of cereal crops. Crop residue and fertilizer placement effects on downy brome growth and nutrient uptake in relation to that of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were conducted in two separate years; one involving conventional (plow) tillage and the other no‐till. Crop residue (burning versus no burning) and fertilizer placement (broadcasting versus subsurface banding) differentials were present both years. The conventional‐till study also included nitrogen (N) rates from 0 to 168 kg/ha and an N only versus nitrogen+phosphorus+sulfur (N+P+S) comparison. Burning increased early‐spring wheat growth substantially, with only limited effect on downy brome population or growth. Broadcasting of fertilizer increased downy brome density and growth compared to banding. Wheat, in contrast, had greater growth and higher N uptake from banded fertilizer. Increasing N increased both seedling survival and culm production of downy brome. Addition of N+P+S increased both wheat and downy brome growth more than N applied alone, but wheat appeared more responsive. Wheat yield tended to be less with higher downy brome infestation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burning substantially increased early-spring wheat growth.

Treatment
Burninge0
Outcome
early‐spring wheat growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Burning increased early‐spring wheat growth substantially”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burning had limited effects on downy brome population or growth.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Burninge0
Interactor
downy bromeBromus tectorume0weed
Outcome
downy brome population or growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bromus tectorum
Bromus tectorum · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Burning increased early‐spring wheat growth substantially, with only limited effect on downy brome population or growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast fertilizer increased downy brome density and growth compared with banding.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Broadcasting of fertilizere0
Interactor
downy bromeBromus tectorume0weed
Outcome
downy brome density and growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
bandinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bromus tectorum
Bromus tectorum · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Broadcasting of fertilizer increased downy brome density and growth compared to banding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banded fertilizer increased wheat growth and nitrogen uptake.

Treatment
banded fertilizere0
Outcome
growth and higher N uptakee0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, in contrast, had greater growth and higher N uptake from banded fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1063 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen increased downy brome seedling survival and culm production.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Increasing Ne0
Interactor
downy bromeBromus tectorume0weed
Outcome
seedling survival and culm production of downy bromee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bromus tectorum
Bromus tectorum · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increasing N increased both seedling survival and culm production of downy brome.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N+P+S increased wheat growth more than N alone.

Treatment
Addition of N+P+Se0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
N applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of N+P+S increased both wheat and downy brome growth more than N applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1233 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N+P+S increased downy brome growth more than N alone.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Addition of N+P+Se0
Interactor
downy bromeBromus tectorume0weed
Outcome
downy brome growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
N applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bromus tectorum
Bromus tectorum · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Addition of N+P+S increased both wheat and downy brome growth more than N applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1233 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat appeared more responsive than downy brome to N+P+S.

Outcome
more responsivee0
Direction
more responsivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but wheat appeared more responsive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1269 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield tended to be lower with higher downy brome infestation.

Interactor
downy bromeBromus tectorume0weed
Outcome
Wheat yielde0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bromus tectorum
Bromus tectorum · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yield tended to be less with higher downy brome infestation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1337 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · Bromus tectorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fire · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 158 positive, 35 negative or no effect

157 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.