Paper · 1937 · Botanical Gazette

Effect of Extracts from the Corn Plant on Growth of Excised Root Tips

William J. Robbins; Virginia B. White

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

1. Milk from immature corn grains was injurious or without benefit to the growth of excised corn root tips. 2. The diffusate from germinated corn grains benefited the growth of excised corn root tips in an agar medium containing mineral salts and dextrose. 3. The diffusate into agar from coleoptile tips slightly inhibited the growth of excised root tips less than 1 mm. long; that from root tips slightly favored the growth. 4. Water extracts of the terminal portions of seedling corn roots favored the growth of excised corn root tips in an agar medium containing dextrose. 5. Extracts of germinated corn grains at higher concentrations injured excised corn root tips, producing hypertrophy of the cortex cells. At lower concentrations the extracts were beneficial. 6. Replacing the nutrient solution by fresh solution when the growth rate of excised corn root tips had decreased resulted in little or no benefit when a mineral nutrient solution containing dextrose was used, but caused renewed growth when the solution contained root extract, corn grain extract, or autolyzed yeast. 7. The significance of the experiments from the standpoint of a medium suitable for the continued growth of excised corn root tips is discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Milk from immature grains injured or did not benefit excised root-tip growth.

Treatment
Milk from immature corn grainse0
Outcome
growth of excised corn root tipse0
Direction
injurious or without benefite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Milk from immature corn grains was injurious or without benefit to the growth of excised corn root tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diffusate from germinated grains benefited excised root-tip growth in agar with salts and dextrose.

Treatment
diffusate from germinated corn grainse0
Outcome
growth of excised corn root tipse0
Direction
benefitede0
Qualifier
agar medium containing mineral salts and dextrosee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The diffusate from germinated corn grains benefited the growth of excised corn root tips in an agar medium containing mineral salts and dextrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coleoptile tip diffusate slightly inhibited growth of excised root tips under 1 mm.

Treatment
diffusate into agar from coleoptile tipse0
Outcome
growth of excised root tipse0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
less than 1 mm. longe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The diffusate into agar from coleoptile tips slightly inhibited the growth of excised root tips less than 1 mm. long”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-tip diffusate slightly favored excised root-tip growth.

Treatment
root tipse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
favorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“that from root tips slightly favored the growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–425 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water extracts of seedling root terminal portions favored excised root-tip growth.

Treatment
Water extracts of the terminal portions of seedling corn rootse0
Outcome
growth of excised corn root tipse0
Direction
favorede0
Qualifier
agar medium containing dextrosee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water extracts of the terminal portions of seedling corn roots favored the growth of excised corn root tips in an agar medium containing dextrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher-concentration germinated-grain extract injured root tips and caused cortex cell hypertrophy.

Treatment
Extracts of germinated corn grains at higher concentrationse0
Outcome
injured excised corn root tips, producing hypertrophy of the cortex cellse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extracts of germinated corn grains at higher concentrations injured excised corn root tips, producing hypertrophy of the cortex cells”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–713 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower-concentration germinated-grain extracts benefited root tips.

Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
beneficiale0
Qualifier
lower concentrationse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At lower concentrations the extracts were beneficial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Renewing mineral nutrient solution with dextrose gave little or no growth benefit.

Treatment
Replacing the nutrient solution by fresh solutione0
Outcome
growth rate of excised corn root tipse0
Direction
little or no benefite0
Qualifier
mineral nutrient solution containing dextrosee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Replacing the nutrient solution by fresh solution when the growth rate of excised corn root tips had decreased resulted in little or no benefit when a mineral nutrient solution containing dextrose was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–977 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Renewal with root extract, corn grain extract, or autolyzed yeast caused renewed root-tip growth.

Treatment
root extract, corn grain extract, or autolyzed yeaste0
Outcome
growth rate of excised corn root tipse0
Direction
renewed growthe0
Comparator
mineral nutrient solution containing dextrosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Replacing the nutrient solution by fresh solution when the growth rate of excised corn root tips had decreased resulted in little or no benefit when a mineral nutrient solution containing dextrose was used, but caused renewed growth when the solution contained root extract, corn grain extract, or autolyzed yeast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1085 · show in text ↑

agar · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

94 papers: 60 positive, 34 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

90 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

botanical · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 3 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

stage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 12 positive, 14 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

botanical · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

340 papers: 198 positive, 142 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 140 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

336 papers more in this group

See all 340 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

168 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,196 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

stage · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.