Paper · 2001

A STUDY ON SEED GERMINATION OF AVENA LUDOVICIANA AND THE EFFECTIVE FACTORS IN SEED DORMANCY BREAKING

H. Salimi; M Ghorbanli

15
claims
32
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Wild oat has two seeds in a spikelet that they have different physiological behavior in regard of seed germiantion. The upper seed of spikelet is smaller and has deeper dormancy than the lower seed. The range of temperature for germination is 5˚C to 25 ˚C and optimal temperature is 15˚C. Both kinds of seeds showed the more germination rate in low temperatures so that 5 and 10˚C are better for germination than that of 20 and 25˚C.Germination was late and slow in 5˚C. This study reveled that alternative temperatures (15:5˚C) was the optimal condition for seed germination. After one and two months, chilling caused 63.5% and 97% germination rate in the lower seeds respectively. Also it caused 11.5% and 92% germination rate for upper seeds. The results showed that chilling for two months was necessary for seed dormancy breaking.Nitrate ions caused 32.75% germination rate in upper seeds and 57.25% germination rate in lower seeds as compared with those of to controls which were 11.5% and 13.75% respectively.GA3 was more effective factor in germination as compared with that of Nitrate ion and cytokinin.Soil stiring caused more germination in burried seeds in different depths of soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper spikelet seeds were smaller and more dormant than lower seeds.

Taxon
Wild oate1
Organ / stage
upper seed of spikelete0
Outcome
smaller and has deeper dormancye0
Comparator
lower seede0

Verbatim

e0

“The upper seed of spikelet is smaller and has deeper dormancy than the lower seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–197 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The germination temperature range was 5˚C to 25 ˚C.

Taxon
Wild oate1
Outcome
range of temperature for germinatione0
Value
5˚C to 25 ˚Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“The range of temperature for germination is 5˚C to 25 ˚C and optimal temperature is 15˚C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–287 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal germination temperature was 15˚C.

Taxon
Wild oate1
Outcome
optimal temperaturee0
Value
15˚Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“optimal temperature is 15˚C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–287 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both seed types germinated more at 5 and 10˚C than at 20 and 25˚C.

Taxon
Wild oate1
Treatment
5 and 10˚Ce0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
20 and 25˚Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“Both kinds of seeds showed the more germination rate in low temperatures so that 5 and 10˚C are better for germination than that of 20 and 25˚C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–432 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination at 5˚C was late and slow.

Taxon
Wild oate1
Treatment
5˚Ce0
Outcome
Germination was late and slowe0

Verbatim

e0

“Germination was late and slow in 5˚C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–469 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternating 15:5˚C was optimal for germination.

Taxon
Wild oate1
Treatment
alternative temperatures (15:5˚C)e0
Outcome
optimal condition for seed germinatione0

Verbatim

e0

“alternative temperatures (15:5˚C) was the optimal condition for seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–575 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One month of chilling yielded 63.5% lower-seed germination.

Taxon
Wild oate1
Treatment
chillinge0
Outcome
germination rate in the lower seedse0
Value
63.5%e0
Qualifier
one and two monthse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“After one and two months, chilling caused 63.5% and 97% germination rate in the lower seeds respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–681 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two months of chilling yielded 97% lower-seed germination.

Taxon
Wild oate1
Treatment
chillinge0
Outcome
germination rate in the lower seedse0
Value
97%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“After one and two months, chilling caused 63.5% and 97% germination rate in the lower seeds respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–681 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One month of chilling yielded 11.5% upper-seed germination.

Taxon
Wild oate1
Treatment
chillinge2
Outcome
germination rate for upper seedse0
Value
11.5%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Also it caused 11.5% and 92% germination rate for upper seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–744 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
e2

“chilling caused”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two months of chilling yielded 92% upper-seed germination.

Taxon
Wild oate1
Treatment
chillinge2
Outcome
germination rate for upper seedse0
Value
92%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Also it caused 11.5% and 92% germination rate for upper seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–744 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
e2

“chilling caused”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–618 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Two months of chilling were necessary to break seed dormancy.

Taxon
Wild oate1
Treatment
chilling for two monthse0
Outcome
seed dormancy breakinge0

Verbatim

e0

“chilling for two months was necessary for seed dormancy breaking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–834 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate treatment gave 32.75% upper-seed germination versus 11.5% in controls.

Taxon
Wild oate1
Treatment
Nitrate ionse0
Outcome
germination rate in upper seedse0
Value
32.75%e0
Qualifier
11.5%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate ions caused 32.75% germination rate in upper seeds and 57.25% germination rate in lower seeds as compared with those of to controls which were 11.5% and 13.75% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1015 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate treatment gave 57.25% lower-seed germination versus 13.75% in controls.

Taxon
Wild oate1
Treatment
Nitrate ionse0
Outcome
germination rate in lower seedse0
Value
57.25%e0
Qualifier
13.75%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate ions caused 32.75% germination rate in upper seeds and 57.25% germination rate in lower seeds as compared with those of to controls which were 11.5% and 13.75% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1015 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 was more effective for germination than nitrate and cytokinin.

Taxon
Wild oate1
Treatment
GA3e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
Nitrate ion and cytokinine0

Verbatim

e0

“GA3 was more effective factor in germination as compared with that of Nitrate ion and cytokinin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil stirring increased germination of buried seeds at different depths.

Taxon
Wild oate1
Treatment
Soil stiringe0
Outcome
germination in burried seedse0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
different depths of soile0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Soil stiring caused more germination in burried seeds in different depths of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1193 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑

cold · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 38 positive, 10 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.