Paper · 2010 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Circadian Clock Components Regulate Entry and Affect Exit of Seasonal Dormancy as Well as Winter Hardiness in Populus Trees

Cristian IbÁñez; Iwanka Kozarewa; Mikael Johansson; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
196
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study addresses the role of the circadian clock in the seasonal growth cycle of trees: growth cessation, bud set, freezing tolerance, and bud burst. Populus tremula x Populus tremuloides (Ptt) LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL1 (PttLHY1), PttLHY2, and TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION1 constitute regulatory clock components because down-regulation by RNA interference of these genes leads to altered phase and period of clock-controlled gene expression as compared to the wild type. Also, both RNA interference lines show about 1-h-shorter critical daylength for growth cessation as compared to the wild type, extending their period of growth. During winter dormancy, when the diurnal variation in clock gene expression stops altogether, down-regulation of PttLHY1 and PttLHY2 expression compromises freezing tolerance and the expression of C-REPEAT BINDING FACTOR1, suggesting a role of these genes in cold hardiness. Moreover, down-regulation of PttLHY1 and PttLHY2 causes a delay in bud burst. This evidence shows that in addition to a role in daylength-controlled processes, PttLHY plays a role in the temperature-dependent processes of dormancy in Populus such as cold hardiness and bud burst.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RNA interference of clock genes altered the phase and period of clock-controlled expression.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Treatment
down-regulation by RNA interferencee0
Outcome
phase and period of clock-controlled gene expressione0
Direction
alterede0
Comparator
wild typee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“down-regulation by RNA interference of these genes leads to altered phase and period of clock-controlled gene expression as compared to the wild type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–470 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both RNA interference lines had about 1-h-shorter critical daylength for growth cessation than wild type.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Treatment
RNA interference linese0
Outcome
critical daylength for growth cessatione0
Direction
shortere0
Value
about 1-h-shortere0
Comparator
wild typee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both RNA interference lines show about 1-h-shorter critical daylength for growth cessation as compared to the wild type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both RNA interference lines extended their period of growth.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Treatment
RNA interference linese0
Outcome
period of growthe0
Direction
extendinge0
Comparator
wild typee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both RNA interference lines show about 1-h-shorter critical daylength for growth cessation as compared to the wild type, extending their period of growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diurnal variation in clock gene expression stopped during winter dormancy.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Outcome
diurnal variation in clock gene expressione0
Direction
stops altogethere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During winter dormancy, when the diurnal variation in clock gene expression stops altogether”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Down-regulation of PttLHY1 and PttLHY2 compromised freezing tolerance.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Treatment
down-regulation of PttLHY1 and PttLHY2 expressione0
Gene
PttLHY1 and PttLHY2e0
Outcome
freezing tolerancee0
Direction
compromisese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“down-regulation of PttLHY1 and PttLHY2 expression compromises freezing tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Down-regulation of PttLHY1 and PttLHY2 compromised C-REPEAT BINDING FACTOR1 expression.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Treatment
down-regulation of PttLHY1 and PttLHY2 expressione0
Gene
C-REPEAT BINDING FACTOR1e0
Outcome
expression of C-REPEAT BINDING FACTOR1e0
Direction
compromisese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“down-regulation of PttLHY1 and PttLHY2 expression compromises freezing tolerance and the expression of C-REPEAT BINDING FACTOR1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Down-regulation of PttLHY1 and PttLHY2 delayed bud burst.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Treatment
down-regulation of PttLHY1 and PttLHY2e0
Gene
PttLHY1 and PttLHY2e0
Outcome
bud burste0
Direction
delaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“down-regulation of PttLHY1 and PttLHY2 causes a delay in bud burst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑

loss of function · phenology · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

loss of function · tolerance: abiotic · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

loss of function · molecular: expression · Populus (poplar)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.