Paper · 1989 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Residual Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization and Winter Cover Cropping on Nitrogen Availability

Daniel V. McCracken; Steven J. Corak; M. Scott Smith; et al.

13
claims
18
verbatim quotes
44
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Long‐term management practices affect the reserve of mineralizable soil N, and so can influence the amount of supplemental N fertilizer required in crop production. This study was conducted to (i) evaluate the residual effects of long‐term N fertilization and winter cover cropping on corn ( Zea mays L.) N nutrition, and (ii) examine the ability of selected soil indices to detect management‐induced differences in soil N availability. In 1986, N fertilizer and winter cover crops were eliminated from plots which, from 1976 through 1985, had received varying tillage treatments, N fertilizer additions, and either hairy vetch ( Vicia villosa Roth), rye ( Secale cereale L.), or no winter cover crop. A history of N fertilization increased corn yield and N uptake (by an average of 20.4 kg N/ha). A history of winter cover cropping with hairy vetch increased corn yield and N uptake (by an average of 28.0 kg N/ha). Rye cover cropping generally had small or inconsistent effects relative to no cover crop. Tillage generally had insignificant effects on corn yield and N uptake. Soil N availability indices were determined on surface samples (0–15 cm) taken 2 wk after corn planting. The anaerobic incubation provided a poor index of N availability. Total soil C and Kjeldahl N were affected by tillage, though not by cover crop or fertilization history, and were marginally correlated with crop response. The autoclave index was only slightly superior to total soil C and Kjeldahl N as a N‐availability index. The soil NO 3 ‐N concentration was highly correlated with corn yield, and N uptake. Though this study was conducted for 1 yr at one site, results indicate that measurement of surface soil NO 3 ‐N made shortly after corn planting can provide a valid index of the effects of past crop and soil management practices on soil N availability to corn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous N fertilization increased corn yield.

Treatment
A history of N fertilizatione0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A history of N fertilization increased corn yield and N uptake (by an average of 20.4 kg N/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous N fertilization increased corn N uptake by 20.4 kg N/ha on average.

Treatment
A history of N fertilizatione0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.4 kg N/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A history of N fertilization increased corn yield and N uptake (by an average of 20.4 kg N/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior hairy vetch cover cropping increased corn yield.

Treatment
winter cover cropping with hairy vetche0
Interactor
hairy vetchVicia villosae0other
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia villosa
Vicia villosa · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Fabelfroh assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A history of winter cover cropping with hairy vetch increased corn yield and N uptake (by an average of 28.0 kg N/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior hairy vetch cover cropping increased corn N uptake by 28.0 kg N/ha on average.

Treatment
winter cover cropping with hairy vetche0
Interactor
hairy vetchVicia villosae0other
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28.0 kg N/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia villosa
Vicia villosa · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Fabelfroh assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A history of winter cover cropping with hairy vetch increased corn yield and N uptake (by an average of 28.0 kg N/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage generally had insignificant effects on corn yield and N uptake.

Treatment
Tillagee0
Outcome
corn yield and N uptakee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tillage generally had insignificant effects on corn yield and N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1086 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anaerobic incubation was a poor index of soil N availability.

Outcome
index of N availabilitye0
Direction
poore0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The anaerobic incubation provided a poor index of N availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1257 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) N nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage affected total soil C and Kjeldahl N.

Treatment
tillagee0
Outcome
Total soil C and Kjeldahl Ne0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total soil C and Kjeldahl N were affected by tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1311 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) N nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover cropping and fertilization history did not affect total soil C and Kjeldahl N.

Treatment
cover crop or fertilization historye0
Outcome
Total soil C and Kjeldahl Ne0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total soil C and Kjeldahl N were affected by tillage, though not by cover crop or fertilization history”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1362 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) N nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–325 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soil C and Kjeldahl N were marginally correlated with crop response.

Treatment
tillagee0
Outcome
crop responsee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total soil C and Kjeldahl N were affected by tillage, though not by cover crop or fertilization history, and were marginally correlated with crop response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1413 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) N nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–325 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The autoclave index was slightly superior to soil C and Kjeldahl N as an N availability index.

Outcome
N‐availability indexe0
Direction
slightly superiore0
Comparator
total soil C and Kjeldahl Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The autoclave index was only slightly superior to total soil C and Kjeldahl N as a N‐availability index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1518 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) N nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–325 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil NO 3 ‐N concentration was highly correlated with corn yield.

Compound
soil NO 3 ‐N concentratione0
Outcome
corn yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil NO 3 ‐N concentration was highly correlated with corn yield, and N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1602 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil NO 3 ‐N concentration was highly correlated with corn N uptake.

Compound
soil NO 3 ‐N concentratione0
Outcome
N uptakee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil NO 3 ‐N concentration was highly correlated with corn yield, and N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1602 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface soil NO 3 ‐N after planting can index management history effects on corn N availability.

Outcome
valid index of the effects of past crop and soil management practices on soil N availability to corne0
Qualifier
shortly after corn plantinge0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“measurement of surface soil NO 3 ‐N made shortly after corn planting can provide a valid index of the effects of past crop and soil management practices on soil N availability to corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1680–1863 · show in text ↑

Vicia villosa · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 45 positive, 9 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Vicia villosa · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

cover crop · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 24 positive, 12 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

cover crop · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 104 positive, 118 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.