Paper · 2018 · Agronomy Journal

Nitrogen Dynamics in Living Mulch and Annual Cover Crop Corn Production Systems

J. S. Andrews; Z. P. Sanders; M. L. Cabrera; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

White clover (living mulch), crimson clover, and rye cover crops were used for corn production. Plant‐available N was determined for each cover crop system to estimate N release. Soil N forms and the timing of N availability varied among the cover crops. Internal N use was similar but partial factor productivity and partial nutrient balance was greatest in the living mulch cover crop. Successful living mulch (LM) systems may be capable of meeting the N requirements of corn ( Zea mays L.) despite competition during corn development. This study compared corn N dynamics in a perennial white clover ( Trifolium pratense L.) LM system and annual cereal rye ( Secale cereale L.) (CR) and crimson clover ( Trifolium incarnatum L. ) (CC) systems. Corn in the LM, CC, and CR cover crop systems received 56, 168, and 280 kg N ha −1 , respectively. The mean total N provided from the cover crops was 145, 105, and 25 kg ha −1 in the LM, CC, and CR cover crop systems, respectively. Water uptake by the LM reduced soil water content, soil N availability, N uptake, and plant‐available N (PAN) compared with the CC and CR cover crop systems. Average grain yield was 10.4, 13.3, and 13.0 Mg ha −1 for the LM, CC, and CR cover crop systems, respectively. Nitrogen internal utilization efficiency was not different among systems, but fertilizer N partial nutrient balance and partial factor productivity was greatest for LM and least for CR. Overall, the LM system had lower soil N availability, grain yield, and PAN, but it supplied a significant amount of legume N to corn and minimized the need for mineral N. We concluded that success of the LM system is dependent on N mineralization of the white clover residue and that yearly weather variation significantly affects mineralization of cover crop residues and PAN.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrogen forms and timing of availability varied among cover crops.

Outcome
Soil N forms and the timing of N availabilitye1
Direction
variede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil N forms and the timing of N availability varied among the cover crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Living mulch provided 145 kg ha −1 of total cover crop nitrogen.

Treatment
LMe1
Outcome
mean total N provided from the cover cropse1
Value
145e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mean total N provided from the cover crops was 145, 105, and 25 kg ha −1 in the LM, CC, and CR cover crop systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–976 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crimson clover provided 105 kg ha −1 of total cover crop nitrogen.

Treatment
CCe1
Outcome
mean total N provided from the cover cropse1
Value
105e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mean total N provided from the cover crops was 145, 105, and 25 kg ha −1 in the LM, CC, and CR cover crop systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–976 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cereal rye provided 25 kg ha −1 of total cover crop nitrogen.

Treatment
CRe1
Outcome
mean total N provided from the cover cropse1
Value
25 kg ha −1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mean total N provided from the cover crops was 145, 105, and 25 kg ha −1 in the LM, CC, and CR cover crop systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Living mulch water uptake reduced soil water content, soil nitrogen availability and corn nitrogen uptake versus annual covers.

Treatment
LMe1
Outcome
soil water content, soil N availability, N uptakee1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
CC and CR cover crop systemse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water uptake by the LM reduced soil water content, soil N availability, N uptake, and plant‐available N (PAN) compared with the CC and CR cover crop systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Living mulch water uptake reduced plant available nitrogen versus annual covers.

Treatment
LMe1
Outcome
plant‐available N (PAN)e1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
CC and CR cover crop systemse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water uptake by the LM reduced soil water content, soil N availability, N uptake, and plant‐available N (PAN) compared with the CC and CR cover crop systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Living mulch corn averaged 10.4 Mg ha −1 grain yield.

Treatment
LMe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Value
10.4e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“Average grain yield was 10.4, 13.3, and 13.0 Mg ha −1 for the LM, CC, and CR cover crop systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1245 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crimson clover corn averaged 13.3 Mg ha −1 grain yield.

Treatment
CCe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Value
13.3e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“Average grain yield was 10.4, 13.3, and 13.0 Mg ha −1 for the LM, CC, and CR cover crop systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1245 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cereal rye corn averaged 13.0 Mg ha −1 grain yield.

Treatment
CRe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Value
13.0 Mg ha −1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“Average grain yield was 10.4, 13.3, and 13.0 Mg ha −1 for the LM, CC, and CR cover crop systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen internal utilization efficiency did not differ among systems.

Treatment
systemse1
Outcome
Nitrogen internal utilization efficiencye1
Direction
not differente1
Comparator
systemse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen internal utilization efficiency was not different among systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1319 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer nitrogen partial nutrient balance and partial factor productivity were highest for LM and lowest for CR.

Treatment
LMe1
Outcome
fertilizer N partial nutrient balance and partial factor productivitye1
Direction
greateste1
Comparator
CRe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertilizer N partial nutrient balance and partial factor productivity was greatest for LM and least for CR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1431 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Living mulch supplied substantial legume nitrogen to corn and minimized mineral nitrogen need.

Outcome
need for mineral Ne1
Direction
minimizede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“it supplied a significant amount of legume N to corn and minimized the need for mineral N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1602 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Living mulch success depends on white clover residue nitrogen mineralization.

Outcome
success of the LM systeme1
Qualifier
N mineralization of the white clover residuee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“success of the LM system is dependent on N mineralization of the white clover residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1707 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual weather variation significantly affects cover crop residue mineralization and plant available nitrogen.

Treatment
yearly weather variatione1
Outcome
mineralization of cover crop residues and PANe1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“yearly weather variation significantly affects mineralization of cover crop residues and PAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–1809 · show in text ↑

cover crop · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 24 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.