Paper · 2014 · Scientific Reports

Bioconversion of wastewater from sweet potato starch production to Paenibacillus polymyxa biofertilizer for tea plants

Shengjun Xu; Zhihui Bai; Bo Jin; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
37
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Wastewater from the sweet potato starch industry is a large source of nutrient-rich substrates. We assessed whether this wastewater could be used to produce Paenibacillus polymyxa biofertilizer for foliar application to tea trees. Using the central composite design methods we experientially determined that the optimal culture conditions for P. polymyxa were pH, 6.5; temperature, 29.0 °C; and incubation time, 16 h. Under these conditions, a maximum biomass of 9.7 × 10(9) cfu/mL was achieved. We then conducted a yearlong field investigation to determine the effect of P. polymyxa biofertilizer on the growth of tea plants (Camellia sinensis). Tea yield, quantity of water extract, and tea polyphenol levels were significantly higher after foliar application of the biofertilizer compared to that in the controls by an average of 16.7%, 6.3%, and 10.4%, respectively. This approach appears to be technically feasible for organic tea production, and is an environmentally friendly way to utilize wastewater.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea yield was significantly higher following foliar biofertilizer application by 16.7%.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
foliar application of the biofertilizere0
Outcome
Tea yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
16.7%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Verbatim

e0

“Tea yield, quantity of water extract, and tea polyphenol levels were significantly higher after foliar application of the biofertilizer compared to that in the controls by an average of 16.7%, 6.3%, and 10.4%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

quantity of water extract was significantly higher following foliar biofertilizer application by 6.3%.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
foliar application of the biofertilizere0
Outcome
quantity of water extracte0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.3%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Verbatim

e0

“Tea yield, quantity of water extract, and tea polyphenol levels were significantly higher after foliar application of the biofertilizer compared to that in the controls by an average of 16.7%, 6.3%, and 10.4%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

tea polyphenol levels was significantly higher following foliar biofertilizer application by 10.4%.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
foliar application of the biofertilizere0
Outcome
tea polyphenol levelse0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.4%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Verbatim

e0

“Tea yield, quantity of water extract, and tea polyphenol levels were significantly higher after foliar application of the biofertilizer compared to that in the controls by an average of 16.7%, 6.3%, and 10.4%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–870 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The wastewater-derived biofertilizer approach was judged feasible for organic tea production.

Taxon
teae0
Outcome
technically feasible for organic tea productione0

Verbatim

e0

“This approach appears to be technically feasible for organic tea production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–946 · show in text ↑

application · yield · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · quality: phytochemicals · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · yield · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · quality: phytochemicals · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.