Paper · 2024 · Foods

Influence of the Culture Conditions on Camellia sinensis Cell Cultures

Pilar Esteban-Campos; Pilar Vela; Raquel Rodríguez-Solana; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Since the last century, it has been shown that dedifferentiated cells of Camellia sinensis can produce catechins and other secondary metabolites under in vitro conditions, with potential applications in the cosmetic, pharmaceutical and food industries. In this work, cell suspension cultures of a C. sinensis cell line (LSC-5Y) were established in a liquid medium in order to optimize the biomass productivity, catechin monomer (GC, EGC, C, EC, CG, and ECG) and alkaloid (TB and CAF) productivity. The following factors were evaluated: concentration of growth regulators (BA and IBA), inoculum size, age of the cell line, light exposure, and effect of biotic elicitors (MeJA and extracts of Ciborinia camelliae). GC, EGC, and ECG increased approximately 1.80-fold when the auxin IBA concentration was increased from 0.1 to 2.0 mg/L. In addition, better productivity of EGC, C, EC, and CAF was achieved by using inoculum densities between 50 and 100 g/L. Although lower inoculum densities (25 g/L) showed a higher growth rate (0.20 d−1), the use of inoculum densities higher than 25 g/L favors a 2–4-fold increase in total catechin (TC) productivity, with maximum productivity being reached after 21 days of culture. However, the cell line showed instability in TC productivity: in the short term (in three successive subcultures), the coefficient of variation was 32.80%, and catechin production capacity was 2.5 years with maximum productivity at 0.5 years. Finally, it was observed that ethanol, used as an elicitor solvent, has a strong elicitor effect capable of increasing the accumulation of catechins up to 5.24 times compared to the treatment without an elicitor.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing IBA raised GC, EGC, and ECG approximately 1.80-fold.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensise0t0
Treatment
IBA concentration was increased from 0.1 to 2.0 mg/Le0t0
Outcome
GC, EGC, and ECGe0t0
Direction
increasede0t0
Value
approximately 1.80-folde0t0
Comparator
0.1e0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GC, EGC, and ECG increased approximately 1.80-fold when the auxin IBA concentration was increased from 0.1 to 2.0 mg/L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculum densities of 50–100 g/L gave better EGC, C, EC, and CAF productivity.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensise0t0
Treatment
inoculum densities between 50 and 100 g/Le0t0
Outcome
productivity of EGC, C, EC, and CAFe0t0
Direction
bettere0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“better productivity of EGC, C, EC, and CAF was achieved by using inoculum densities between 50 and 100 g/L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–953 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculum density of 25 g/L had a higher growth rate of 0.20 d−1.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensise0t0
Treatment
lower inoculum densities (25 g/L)e0t0
Outcome
growth ratee0t0
Direction
highere0t0
Value
0.20 d−1e0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower inoculum densities (25 g/L) showed a higher growth rate (0.20 d−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Densities above 25 g/L increased total catechin productivity two to fourfold.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensise0t0
Treatment
inoculum densities higher than 25 g/Le0t0
Outcome
total catechin (TC) productivitye0t0
Direction
increasee0t0
Value
2–4-folde0t0
Comparator
25 g/Le0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of inoculum densities higher than 25 g/L favors a 2–4-fold increase in total catechin (TC) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum total catechin productivity occurred after 21 days.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensise0t0
Outcome
maximum productivitye0t0
Direction
maximume0t0
Qualifier
after 21 days of culturee0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum productivity being reached after 21 days of culture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total catechin productivity varied 32.80% across three successive subcultures.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensise0t0
Outcome
coefficient of variatione0t0
Value
32.80%e0t0
Qualifier
in three successive subculturese0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the short term (in three successive subcultures), the coefficient of variation was 32.80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Catechin production capacity lasted 2.5 years, peaking at 0.5 years.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensise0t0
Outcome
catechin production capacitye0t0
Value
2.5 yearse0t0
Qualifier
maximum productivity at 0.5 yearse0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“catechin production capacity was 2.5 years with maximum productivity at 0.5 years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1458 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol increased catechin accumulation up to 5.24 times relative to no elicitor.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensise0t0
Treatment
ethanole0t0
Outcome
accumulation of catechinse0t0
Direction
increasinge0t0
Value
up to 5.24 timese0t0
Comparator
treatment without an elicitore0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethanol, used as an elicitor solvent, has a strong elicitor effect capable of increasing the accumulation of catechins up to 5.24 times compared to the treatment without an elicitor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1671 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–56 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

inoculation · yield · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.