Paper · 1997 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Influence of UV‐B radiation and putrescine on shoot and root growth of cucumber seedlings grown in nutrient solution

Donald T. Krizek; George F. Kramer; Roman M. Mirecki

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings were grown in growth chambers in nutrient solution containing 0 or 500 μM putrescine (Put) and were exposed to 0.2 or 15 kJ‐m‐2 day1 of biologically effective UV‐B radiation to determine the comparative sensitivity of shoots and roots to increased UV‐B and the possible protective effect of polyamines. Shoot growth in UV‐B‐treated plants was reduced 48%, root growth 63%, total leaf area 38%, and specific leaf weight (SLW) 22%. This was in contrast to previous reports of increased SLW in cucumber plants grown in vermiculite or in a peat‐vermiculite mix. Putrescine treatment increased leaf area in the second and third leaf and total leaf area and Put also increased dry weight of shoots, but had no effect on dry weight of roots or on SLW. The Put treatment was ineffective in ameliorating UV‐B induced leaf chlorosis. This is the first report of greater sensitivity of roots to UV‐B radiation than of shoots in plants grown in solution culture. This could have significant consequences on marginal lands where root growth is already under limiting conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B reduced cucumber shoot growth by 48%.

Taxon
Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativuse1
Treatment
UV‐B‐treatede0
Outcome
Shoot growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
48%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot growth in UV‐B‐treated plants was reduced 48%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–412 · show in text ↑
e1

“Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings were grown in growth chambers in nutrient solution containing 0 or 500 μM putrescine (Put) and were exposed to 0.2 or 15 kJ‐m‐2 day1 of biologically effective UV‐B radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B reduced cucumber root growth by 63%.

Taxon
Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativuse2
Treatment
UV‐B‐treatede1
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
reducede1
Value
63%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root growth 63%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–429 · show in text ↑
e1

“Shoot growth in UV‐B‐treated plants was reduced 48%, root growth 63%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–429 · show in text ↑
e2

“Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings were grown in growth chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B reduced total leaf area by 38%.

Taxon
Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativuse1
Treatment
UV‐B‐treatede0
Outcome
total leaf areae0
Direction
reducede0
Value
38%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot growth in UV‐B‐treated plants was reduced 48%, root growth 63%, total leaf area 38%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–450 · show in text ↑
e1

“Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings were grown in growth chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B reduced specific leaf weight by 22%.

Taxon
Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativuse1
Treatment
UV‐B‐treatede0
Outcome
specific leaf weight (SLW)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot growth in UV‐B‐treated plants was reduced 48%, root growth 63%, total leaf area 38%, and specific leaf weight (SLW) 22%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–486 · show in text ↑
e1

“Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings were grown in growth chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine increased second- and third-leaf area and total leaf area.

Taxon
Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativuse1
Treatment
Putrescine treatmente0
Outcome
leaf area in the second and third leaf and total leaf areae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Putrescine treatment increased leaf area in the second and third leaf and total leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–705 · show in text ↑
e1

“Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings were grown in growth chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine increased shoot dry weight.

Taxon
Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativuse1
Treatment
Pute0
Outcome
dry weight of shootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Put also increased dry weight of shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–749 · show in text ↑
e1

“Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings were grown in growth chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine had no effect on root dry weight or specific leaf weight.

Taxon
Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativuse1
Treatment
Pute0
Outcome
dry weight of roots or on SLWe0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Put also increased dry weight of shoots, but had no effect on dry weight of roots or on SLW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–801 · show in text ↑
e1

“Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings were grown in growth chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine did not ameliorate UV-B-induced leaf chlorosis.

Taxon
Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativuse1
Treatment
Put treatmente0
Outcome
UV‐B induced leaf chlorosise0
Direction
ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Put treatment was ineffective in ameliorating UV‐B induced leaf chlorosis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–881 · show in text ↑
e1

“Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings were grown in growth chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots were more sensitive to UV-B than shoots in solution culture.

Taxon
Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativuse1
Outcome
sensitivity of roots to UV‐B radiatione0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
shootse0
Setting
solution culturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater sensitivity of roots to UV‐B radiation than of shoots in plants grown in solution culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1007 · show in text ↑
e1

“Poinsett cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings were grown in growth chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–87 · show in text ↑

putrescine · physiology: pigments · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

putrescine · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

uv · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

39 papers: 10 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.