Paper · 1985 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Effects of water rinses after calcium chloride dips, with and without additives, on the control of bitter pit of apples

KJ Scott; J O'Loughlin; B England; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies on the control of bitter pit in apples after harvest were conducted during two seasons in Tasmania and New Zealand. The cultivars, Cox's Orange Pippin, Sturmer Pippin, Golden Delicious, Delicious and Cleopatra, which are susceptible to bitter pit on overseas markets, were examined. Bitter pit was reduced and calcium content of the fruit increased, by dipping the fruit in calcium chloride solutions (1-3% w/v). The addition of diphenylamine or the non-ionic wetting agent, Agral 60 (ICI Australia), had little effect on the control of bitter pit or on the calcium content of the treated fruit. Rinsing in water even 1 or 2 days after dipping did not significantly increase the incidence of bitter pit or lower the calcium content of the fruit. There was no difference in the incidence of bitter pit between fruit stored at ambient temperature (15-20¦C) or at 3-5¦C during the interval between dipping and rinsing. Dipping apples in calcium chloride followed, after 1 or more days, by a water rinse may be suitable commercially for reducing bitter pit in a number of cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping apples in calcium chloride solutions (1-3% w/v) reduced bitter pit.

Organ / stage
fruite2
Treatment
dipping the fruit in calcium chloride solutions (1-3% w/v)e2
Outcome
Bitter pite2
Direction
reducede2
Setting
Tasmania and New Zealande1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Studies on the control of bitter pit in apples after harvest were conducted during two seasons in Tasmania and New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bitter pit was reduced and calcium content of the fruit increased, by dipping the fruit in calcium chloride solutions (1-3% w/v)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping apples in calcium chloride solutions (1-3% w/v) increased calcium content of the fruit.

Organ / stage
fruite2
Treatment
dipping the fruit in calcium chloride solutions (1-3% w/v)e2
Outcome
calcium content of the fruite2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
Tasmania and New Zealande1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Studies on the control of bitter pit in apples after harvest were conducted during two seasons in Tasmania and New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bitter pit was reduced and calcium content of the fruit increased, by dipping the fruit in calcium chloride solutions (1-3% w/v)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding diphenylamine to the calcium chloride dip had little effect on bitter pit control or fruit calcium content.

Organ / stage
treated fruite3
Treatment
addition of diphenylaminee3
Outcome
control of bitter pit or on the calcium content of the treated fruite3
Direction
had little effecte3
Setting
Tasmania and New Zealande1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Studies on the control of bitter pit in apples after harvest were conducted during two seasons in Tasmania and New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e3

“The addition of diphenylamine or the non-ionic wetting agent, Agral 60 (ICI Australia), had little effect on the control of bitter pit or on the calcium content of the treated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding the non-ionic wetting agent Agral 60 to the calcium chloride dip had little effect on bitter pit control or fruit calcium content.

Organ / stage
treated fruite3
Treatment
non-ionic wetting agent, Agral 60e3
Outcome
control of bitter pit or on the calcium content of the treated fruite3
Direction
had little effecte3
Setting
Tasmania and New Zealande1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Studies on the control of bitter pit in apples after harvest were conducted during two seasons in Tasmania and New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e3

“The addition of diphenylamine or the non-ionic wetting agent, Agral 60 (ICI Australia), had little effect on the control of bitter pit or on the calcium content of the treated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rinsing in water 1 or 2 days after dipping did not significantly increase bitter pit incidence.

Organ / stage
fruite4
Treatment
Rinsing in water even 1 or 2 days after dippinge4
Outcome
incidence of bitter pite4
Direction
did not significantly increasee4
Setting
Tasmania and New Zealande1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Studies on the control of bitter pit in apples after harvest were conducted during two seasons in Tasmania and New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e4

“Rinsing in water even 1 or 2 days after dipping did not significantly increase the incidence of bitter pit or lower the calcium content of the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rinsing in water 1 or 2 days after dipping did not significantly lower fruit calcium content.

Organ / stage
fruite4
Treatment
Rinsing in water even 1 or 2 days after dippinge4
Outcome
calcium content of the fruite4
Direction
lowere4
Setting
Tasmania and New Zealande1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Studies on the control of bitter pit in apples after harvest were conducted during two seasons in Tasmania and New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e4

“Rinsing in water even 1 or 2 days after dipping did not significantly increase the incidence of bitter pit or lower the calcium content of the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage at 3-5¦C or at ambient temperature between dipping and rinsing made no difference to bitter pit incidence.

Organ / stage
fruite5
Treatment
at 3-5¦Ce5
Outcome
incidence of bitter pite5
Direction
no differencee5
Comparator
ambient temperature (15-20¦C)e5
Setting
Tasmania and New Zealande1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Studies on the control of bitter pit in apples after harvest were conducted during two seasons in Tasmania and New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e5

“There was no difference in the incidence of bitter pit between fruit stored at ambient temperature (15-20¦C) or at 3-5¦C during the interval between dipping and rinsing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–922 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping apples in calcium chloride followed by a water rinse 1 or more days later may be suitable commercially for reducing bitter pit in a number of cultivars.

Treatment
Dipping apples in calcium chloride followed, after 1 or more days, by a water rinsee6
Outcome
reducing bitter pite6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Dipping apples in calcium chloride followed, after 1 or more days, by a water rinse may be suitable commercially for reducing bitter pit in a number of cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1085 · show in text ↑

diphenylamine · control · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 25 positive, 7 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

application · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 80 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 80 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 100 positive, 16 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.