Paper · 1973 · Physiologia Plantarum

In vivo Characterization of Nitrate Reductase Activity in Cotton

I. M. BILAL; D. W. RAINS

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The in vivo nitrate reductase activity in leaf tissue of cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) was characterized. Enzymatic activity was linear with time up to 60 min. The assay for nitrate reductase activity was optimized in leaf slices 400 μm wide incubated in an anaerobic system at 30°C, in a 0.02 M KNO 3 medium at pH 7.0 with 1 % propanol. In vivo activity was highest in recently matured leaves at the top of the plant. Both light and nitrate enhanced in vivo enzymatic activity. The activity was highest after 9 hours in the light and then decreased steadily for several more hours even in the presence of light. The nitrate reductase activity was more strongly correlated to the levels of NO 3 ‐N in the culture solution than to the NO 3 ‐N level in the tissue. The utility of this technique in nitrate reductase assay in a tissue containing large amounts of phenolic compounds is discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton leaf nitrate reductase activity was linear with time up to 60 minutes.

Gene
nitrate reductasee1
Outcome
Enzymatic activitye0
Direction
lineare0
Value
60 mine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enzymatic activity was linear with time up to 60 min.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“The assay for nitrate reductase activity was optimized in leaf slices 400 μm wide incubated in an anaerobic system at 30°C, in a 0.02 M KNO 3 medium at pH 7.0 with 1 % propanol.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–348 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The assay was optimized in 400 μm leaf slices under anaerobic conditions at 30°C and specified medium conditions.

Organ / stage
leaf slicese0
Gene
nitrate reductasee0
Outcome
assay for nitrate reductase activitye0
Value
400 μme0
Qualifier
anaerobic system at 30°C, in a 0.02 M KNO 3 medium at pH 7.0 with 1 % propanole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The assay for nitrate reductase activity was optimized in leaf slices 400 μm wide incubated in an anaerobic system at 30°C, in a 0.02 M KNO 3 medium at pH 7.0 with 1 % propanol.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–348 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In vivo activity was highest in recently matured top leaves.

Organ / stage
recently matured leavese0
Outcome
In vivo activitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vivo activity was highest in recently matured leaves at the top of the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–429 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light enhanced in vivo nitrate reductase activity.

Treatment
lighte0
Outcome
in vivo enzymatic activitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both light and nitrate enhanced in vivo enzymatic activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–489 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate enhanced in vivo nitrate reductase activity.

Treatment
nitratee0
Outcome
in vivo enzymatic activitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both light and nitrate enhanced in vivo enzymatic activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–489 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Activity peaked after nine hours of light.

Treatment
lighte0
Outcome
activitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
9 hourse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity was highest after 9 hours in the light and then decreased steadily for several more hours even in the presence of light.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After its light-associated peak, activity decreased steadily despite continued light.

Outcome
activitye0
Direction
decreased steadilye0
Qualifier
even in the presence of lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity was highest after 9 hours in the light and then decreased steadily for several more hours even in the presence of light.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate reductase activity correlated more strongly with solution nitrate nitrogen than tissue nitrate nitrogen.

Gene
nitrate reductasee0
Outcome
nitrate reductase activitye0
Qualifier
NO 3 ‐N in the culture solutione0
Comparator
NO 3 ‐N level in the tissuee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrate reductase activity was more strongly correlated to the levels of NO 3 ‐N in the culture solution than to the NO 3 ‐N level in the tissue.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–773 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: enzyme activity · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: enzyme activity · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.