Paper · 1992 · Canadian Journal of Microbiology

Promotion of apple tree growth and fruit production by the EBW-4 strain of Bacillus subtilis in apple replant disease soil

R. S. Utkhede; E. M. Smith

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
53
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field trial was conducted near Kelowna, British Columbia, to determine the effect of biological treatments alone and in combination with formalin fumigation in apple replant disease soil. The response was measured by the increase in cross-sectional trunk area, total shoot growth, and fruit yield of McIntosh apple trees on M.26 rootstock. The postplanting drench application of strain EBW-4 of Bacillus subtilis alone was consistently effective in increasing cross-sectional trunk area for 5 years, total shoot growth for 4 years, and fruit yield for 3 years. The biological agent EBW-4 of B. subtilis in combination with formalin fumigation was also effective in promoting total shoot growth and cross-sectional trunk area. The application of formalin fumigation alone was effective in increasing shoot growth for 2 years and cross-sectional trunk area for 1 year only. This treatment did not increase fruit yield for 3 years. The consistent performance of strain EBW-4 of B. subtilis during 1986-1991 indicates that this bacterium has the potential for biological control of replant disease under orchard conditions in the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EBW-4 drench increased trunk area for five years.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae7
Treatment
postplanting drench application of strain EBW-4 of Bacillus subtilis alonee0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
cross-sectional trunk areae0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
for 5 yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The postplanting drench application of strain EBW-4 of Bacillus subtilis alone was consistently effective in increasing cross-sectional trunk area for 5 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–500 · show in text ↑
e7

“McIntosh apple trees on M.26 rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EBW-4 drench increased shoot growth for four years.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae7
Treatment
postplanting drench application of strain EBW-4 of Bacillus subtilis alonee0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
total shoot growthe0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
for 4 yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The postplanting drench application of strain EBW-4 of Bacillus subtilis alone was consistently effective in increasing cross-sectional trunk area for 5 years, total shoot growth for 4 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–532 · show in text ↑
e7

“McIntosh apple trees on M.26 rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EBW-4 drench increased fruit yield for three years.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae7
Treatment
postplanting drench application of strain EBW-4 of Bacillus subtilis alonee0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
for 3 yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The postplanting drench application of strain EBW-4 of Bacillus subtilis alone was consistently effective in increasing cross-sectional trunk area for 5 years, total shoot growth for 4 years, and fruit yield for 3 years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–562 · show in text ↑
e7

“McIntosh apple trees on M.26 rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EBW-4 combined with formalin promoted total shoot growth and trunk area.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae7
Treatment
EBW-4 of B. subtilis in combination with formalin fumigatione0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
total shoot growth and cross-sectional trunk areae0
Direction
promotinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biological agent EBW-4 of B. subtilis in combination with formalin fumigation was also effective in promoting total shoot growth and cross-sectional trunk area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–727 · show in text ↑
e7

“McIntosh apple trees on M.26 rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formalin alone increased shoot growth for two years.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae7
Treatment
formalin fumigation alonee0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
for 2 yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of formalin fumigation alone was effective in increasing shoot growth for 2 years and cross-sectional trunk area for 1 year only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–873 · show in text ↑
e7

“McIntosh apple trees on M.26 rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formalin alone increased trunk area for one year.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae7
Treatment
formalin fumigation alonee0
Outcome
cross-sectional trunk areae0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
for 1 year onlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of formalin fumigation alone was effective in increasing shoot growth for 2 years and cross-sectional trunk area for 1 year only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–873 · show in text ↑
e7

“McIntosh apple trees on M.26 rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formalin alone did not increase fruit yield over three years.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae7
Treatment
formalin fumigation alonee1
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0
Qualifier
for 3 yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment did not increase fruit yield for 3 years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–930 · show in text ↑
e7

“McIntosh apple trees on M.26 rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–340 · show in text ↑
e1

“formalin fumigation alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–772 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors identify EBW-4 as having potential for biological control of replant disease in orchards.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae7
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
potential for biological control of replant diseasee0
Setting
Okanagan Valley of British Columbiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this bacterium has the potential for biological control of replant disease under orchard conditions in the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1164 · show in text ↑
e7

“McIntosh apple trees on M.26 rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–340 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus subtilis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–414 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

solarization · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

solarization · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 76 positive, 31 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

application · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 107 positive, 34 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.