Paper · 2010 · Soil Science & Plant Nutrition

Zinc nutrition effect on the tolerance of wheat genotypes toFusariumroot-rot disease in a solution culture experiment

Amir Hossein Khoshgoftarmanesh; Sahar Kabiri; Hossein Shariatmadari; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
35
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Zinc (Zn) nutrition and plant genotype are two factors that may affect the tolerance of wheat to root-rot diseases. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of Zn on shoot yield, root permeability and infection by Fusarium solani in six wheat genotypes with different Zn efficiency. A greenhouse (solution culture) experiment was carried out in which five bread wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L. cvs Rushan, Kavir, Cross, Pishtaz and Falat) and one durum wheat genotype (Triticum durum L. cv. Yav79), which are common in Zn-deficient soils of Iran and were exposed to two levels of Zn (0 and 1 μmol L–1 Zn kg−1, as ZnSO4.7H2O) and two F. solani infection levels (0 and 106 spore mL−1). Zinc deficiency significantly decreased shoot dry matter in five of the genotypes (Yav79, Kavir, Rushan, Cross and Falat), but had no effect on shoot growth in Pishtaz. Infection with F. solani significantly decreased the shoot dry matter in Yav79, but did not affect the shoot dry weight of the other wheat genotypes. Root membrane permeability was lower in the Zn treatments than in the Zn-free treatments. Zinc deficiency caused a decrease in root reactive sulfhydryl (SH) groups, particularly in the Cross genotype. Root sulfhydryl groups decreased with Fusarium infection. Zinc application sharply increased the Zn content and decreased the Mn content of the shoots. Application of Zn had a positive effect on the tolerance of wheat to F. solani root rot. The relationship between Zn nutrition and disease tolerance suggests that Zn deficiency should be treated before evaluating the cost-effectiveness of fungicides. No correlation was found between the Zn efficiency of the wheat genotypes and Fusarium root-rot disease severity in this solution culture experiment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc deficiency significantly decreased shoot dry matter in five named wheat genotypes.

Material
Yav79, Kavir, Rushan, Cross and Falate0
Treatment
Zinc deficiencye0
Outcome
shoot dry mattere0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc deficiency significantly decreased shoot dry matter in five of the genotypes (Yav79, Kavir, Rushan, Cross and Falat)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc deficiency had no effect on shoot growth in Pishtaz.

Material
Pishtaze0
Treatment
Zinc deficiencye1
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but had no effect on shoot growth in Pishtaz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zinc deficiency significantly decreased shoot dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F. solani infection significantly decreased shoot dry matter in Yav79.

Material
Yav79e0
Treatment
Infection with F. solanie0
Interactor
F. solaniFusarium solanie0pathogen
Outcome
shoot dry mattere0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infection with F. solani significantly decreased the shoot dry matter in Yav79”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. solani infection did not affect shoot dry weight in other wheat genotypes.

Treatment
Infection with F. solanie1
Interactor
F. solaniFusarium solanie1pathogen
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but did not affect the shoot dry weight of the other wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1032 · show in text ↑
e1

“Infection with F. solani significantly decreased the shoot dry matter in Yav79”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc treatment lowered root membrane permeability relative to zinc-free treatment.

Treatment
Zn treatmentse0
Outcome
Root membrane permeabilitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Zn-free treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root membrane permeability was lower in the Zn treatments than in the Zn-free treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc deficiency decreased root reactive sulfhydryl groups, especially in Cross.

Material
Crosse0
Treatment
Zinc deficiencye0
Outcome
root reactive sulfhydryl (SH) groupse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc deficiency caused a decrease in root reactive sulfhydryl (SH) groups, particularly in the Cross genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium infection decreased root sulfhydryl groups.

Treatment
Fusarium infectione0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
Root sulfhydryl groupse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root sulfhydryl groups decreased with Fusarium infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application sharply increased shoot zinc content.

Treatment
Zinc applicatione0
Outcome
Zn contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc application sharply increased the Zn content and decreased the Mn content of the shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application decreased shoot manganese content.

Treatment
Zinc applicatione0
Outcome
Mn content of the shootse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc application sharply increased the Zn content and decreased the Mn content of the shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application improved wheat tolerance to F. solani root rot.

Treatment
Application of Zne0
Interactor
F. solaniFusarium solanie0pathogen
Outcome
tolerance of wheat to F. solani root rote0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Zn had a positive effect on the tolerance of wheat to F. solani root rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1474 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend treating zinc deficiency before assessing fungicide cost-effectiveness.

Outcome
Zn deficiency should be treated before evaluating the cost-effectiveness of fungicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn deficiency should be treated before evaluating the cost-effectiveness of fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1636 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc efficiency was uncorrelated with Fusarium root-rot disease severity.

Material
wheat genotypese0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium root-rot disease severitye0
Direction
No correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No correlation was found between the Zn efficiency of the wheat genotypes and Fusarium root-rot disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1750 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

27 papers: 19 positive, 8 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

Fusarium · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Fusarium solani · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

infection · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 14 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

infection · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 13 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.