Paper · 1991 · Weed Research

Weed control in squash and tomato fields by soil solarization in the Jordan Valley

B. E. ABU‐IRMAILEH

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary: Black (BPE) and clear polyethylene mulches (CPE), 0.08 and 0.06 mm thick, respectively, were compared for their effectiveness for soil solarization over three seasons during 1986–1989 in weedy fields. Solarization for 6 weeks reduced weed growth and enhanced crop yields. However, further mulching with BPE after solarization with either BPE or CPE gave the best results. Not all weeds were sensitive to solarization. Some weed species were completely controlled; others were reduced to varying degrees; yet other weed species seemed to be enhanced by solarization. Solarization without further mulching was no better than farmer‐practice in reducing weed growth or in increasing crop yield. Weeds required further removal after the middle of the growing season. Any soil disturbance after solarization reduced the weed control effect of solarization. Crops grew best in plots after solarization with BPE if they were planted in the same mulch after it was perforated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six weeks of solarization reduced weed growth.

Taxon
squash and tomatot0
Treatment
Solarization for 6 weekse0
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Verbatim

t0

“squash and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Solarization for 6 weeks reduced weed growth and enhanced crop yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six weeks of solarization enhanced crop yields.

Taxon
squash and tomatot0
Treatment
Solarization for 6 weekse0
Outcome
crop yieldse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“squash and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Solarization for 6 weeks reduced weed growth and enhanced crop yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–280 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Further BPE mulching after solarization gave the best results.

Taxon
squash and tomatot0
Treatment
further mulching with BPEe0
Outcome
best resultse0
Direction
beste0

Verbatim

t0

“squash and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“further mulching with BPE after solarization with either BPE or CPE gave the best results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarization completely controlled some weed species.

Taxon
squash and tomatot0
Outcome
weed speciese0
Direction
completely controllede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

t0

“squash and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Some weed species were completely controlled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarization reduced other weed species to varying degrees.

Taxon
squash and tomatot0
Outcome
otherse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

t0

“squash and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“others were reduced to varying degrees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–511 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarization appeared to enhance some weed species.

Taxon
squash and tomatot0
Treatment
solarizatione0
Outcome
weed speciese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“squash and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“yet other weed species seemed to be enhanced by solarization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarization alone did not outperform farmer practice for weed growth.

Taxon
squash and tomatot0
Treatment
Solarization without further mulchinge0
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
no bettere0
Comparator
farmer‐practicee0

Verbatim

t0

“squash and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Solarization without further mulching was no better than farmer‐practice in reducing weed growth or in increasing crop yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarization alone did not outperform farmer practice for crop yield.

Taxon
squash and tomatot0
Treatment
Solarization without further mulchinge0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
no bettere0
Comparator
farmer‐practicee0

Verbatim

t0

“squash and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Solarization without further mulching was no better than farmer‐practice in reducing weed growth or in increasing crop yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil disturbance after solarization reduced its weed control effect.

Taxon
squash and tomatot0
Treatment
soil disturbance after solarizatione0
Outcome
weed control effecte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“squash and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Any soil disturbance after solarization reduced the weed control effect of solarization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–860 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crops grew best when planted in perforated BPE used for solarization.

Taxon
squash and tomatot0
Treatment
solarization with BPEe0
Outcome
Crops grew beste0
Direction
beste0

Verbatim

t0

“squash and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Crops grew best in plots after solarization with BPE if they were planted in the same mulch after it was perforated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–977 · show in text ↑

solarization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

32 papers: 22 positive, 10 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

mulching · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results differ

43 papers: 33 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

mulching · weed · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 49 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

mulching · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

210 papers: 184 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Tomatoes with hairy vetch mulch yielded more than those with black polyethylene or no mulch.

    COVER CROPS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD PRODUCTION · 2000 · compared with black polyethylene and no mulch system

    No difference from an alternative

  2. positive
  3. positive

206 papers more in this group

See all 210 papers →

solarization · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

solarization · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.