Paper · 1979 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Effects of Mulching on the Spread of Aphid-Transmitted Watermelon Mosaic Virus to Summer Squash1

J. A. Wyman; N. C. Toscano; K. Kido; et al.

14
claims
26
verbatim quotes
53
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Alate aphid populations migrating into summer squash plantings between Feb. and May were reduced by 96 and 68% by aluminum and white plastic mulches, respectively. The green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer), was predominant and comprised 92% of the 16 aphid species trapped. Watermelon mosaic virus was the only cucurbit virus recovered, and symptoms appeared in the field 3 weeks after peak aphid flights in Mar. Virus incidence increased rapidly and reached 90% in untreated plots by May. Aluminum and white plastic mulches reduced virus incidence by 94 and 77%, respectively, at peak fruit harvest in Apr. Mineral oil sprays significantly reduced virus spread early in the growing season, and weekly application of methyl demeton did not affect virus incidence. Aluminum and white plastic mulches increased total fruit yield by 43%. Yield responses were particularly evident during early production with 85 and 69% increases resulting from the aluminum and white plastic mulches, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum mulch reduced migrating alate aphids by 96%.

Taxon
summer squashe0
Treatment
aluminume0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
Alate aphid populationse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
96e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Alate aphid populations migrating into summer squash plantings between Feb. and May were reduced by 96 and 68% by aluminum and white plastic mulches, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White plastic mulch reduced migrating alate aphids by 68%.

Taxon
summer squashe0
Treatment
white plastic mulchese0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
Alate aphid populationse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
68%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Alate aphid populations migrating into summer squash plantings between Feb. and May were reduced by 96 and 68% by aluminum and white plastic mulches, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Myzus persicae comprised 92% of the 16 aphid species trapped.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Interactor
Myzus persicaeMyzus persicaee0pest
Outcome
Myzus persicae (Sulzer), was predominante0
Value
92%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Myzus persicae
Myzus persicae · InteractorScott Bauer · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer), was predominant and comprised 92% of the 16 aphid species trapped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–277 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watermelon mosaic virus was the only cucurbit virus recovered.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Interactor
Watermelon mosaic virusWatermelon mosaic viruse0pathogen
Outcome
only cucurbit virus recoverede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Watermelon mosaic virus
Watermelon mosaic virus · InteractorDr. Jan Hinrichs-Berger, Landwirtschaftliches Technologiezentrum Augustenberg, Karlsruhe. · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon mosaic virus was the only cucurbit virus recovered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–340 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus symptoms appeared three weeks after peak aphid flights.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Outcome
symptoms appearede0
Value
3 weekse0
Setting
fielde0

Verbatim

e0

“symptoms appeared in the field 3 weeks after peak aphid flights in Mar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–417 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus incidence reached 90% in untreated plots by May.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Outcome
Virus incidencee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
90%e0
Comparator
untreated plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“Virus incidence increased rapidly and reached 90% in untreated plots by May”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–493 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum mulch reduced virus incidence by 94%.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
Aluminume0
Outcome
virus incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
94e0
Qualifier
peak fruit harvest in Apr.e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminum and white plastic mulches reduced virus incidence by 94 and 77%, respectively, at peak fruit harvest in Apr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White plastic mulch reduced virus incidence by 77%.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
white plastic mulchese0
Outcome
virus incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
77%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminum and white plastic mulches reduced virus incidence by 94 and 77%, respectively, at peak fruit harvest in Apr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral oil sprays significantly reduced early virus spread.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
Mineral oil sprayse0
Outcome
virus spreade0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mineral oil sprays significantly reduced virus spread early in the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly methyl demeton did not affect virus incidence.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
weekly application of methyl demetone0
Outcome
virus incidencee0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“weekly application of methyl demeton did not affect virus incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum mulch increased total fruit yield by 43%.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
Aluminume0
Outcome
total fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminum and white plastic mulches increased total fruit yield by 43%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White plastic mulch increased total fruit yield by 43%.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
white plastic mulchese0
Outcome
total fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminum and white plastic mulches increased total fruit yield by 43%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum mulch increased early yield by 85%.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
aluminume0
Outcome
Yield responsese0
Direction
increasese0
Value
85e0
Qualifier
early productione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Yield responses were particularly evident during early production with 85 and 69% increases resulting from the aluminum and white plastic mulches, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White plastic mulch increased early yield by 69%.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
white plastic mulchese0
Outcome
Yield responsese0
Direction
increasese0
Value
69%e0
Qualifier
early productione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Yield responses were particularly evident during early production with 85 and 69% increases resulting from the aluminum and white plastic mulches, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

aluminium atom · pest · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

aluminium atom · disease · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results differ

43 papers: 33 positive, 10 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

mulching · pest · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mulching · disease · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.