Paper · 2013 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Effects of deficit irrigation on tomato and eggplant and their infection with the root-knot nematode under controlled environmental conditions

Osama Mohawesh; Muwaffaq Karajeh

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

AbstractDeficit irrigation has been widely investigated as a valuable strategy for dry regions where water is the limiting factor in crop cultivation. Soil moisture can be one of the important factors that influence root-knot nematode (RKN) disease development. To determine how different levels of irrigation can affect disease development, irrigation regimes ranging from 20% to full field capacity (FC) were applied to tomato and eggplant plants inoculated with Meloidogyne javanica (M. javanica) under controlled conditions. In addition, in vitro bioassays were done to evaluate the effect of water potential and soil moisture content on M. javanica viability in the soil and reproduction on plant hosts. The relative egg hatching percentage decreased significantly with decreasing water potential from –0.1 to –1 MPa. The use of 80% irrigation level caused minor reductions in growth but significantly reduced nematode infection load. Nematode infection was reduced even further at lower levels of irrigation, however this also led to marked reductions in fresh and dry weights of the tomato and eggplants. Therefore, deficit irrigation could be used at a rate of 80% or 60% of FC to increase water use efficiency and reduce the level of RKN (M. javanica) infection without greatly reducing the growth performance of tomato and eggplant crops.Keywords: deficit irrigationmanagementwater potentialwater use efficiency FundingThis work is a part of research project financially supported by Scientific Research Support Fund of Jordan-Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research in a co-ordination with the Scientific Research Deanship of Mutah University, Karak, Jordan.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower water potential significantly reduced nematode egg hatching.

Treatment
decreasing water potential from –0.1 to –1 MPae0
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae1pathogen
Outcome
relative egg hatching percentagee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative egg hatching percentage decreased significantly with decreasing water potential from –0.1 to –1 MPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato and eggplant plants inoculated with Meloidogyne javanica (M. javanica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–499 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 80% caused minor growth reductions.

Treatment
80% irrigation levele0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of 80% irrigation level caused minor reductions in growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–888 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato and eggplant plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 80% significantly reduced nematode infection load.

Treatment
80% irrigation levele0
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae1pathogen
Outcome
nematode infection loade0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of 80% irrigation level caused minor reductions in growth but significantly reduced nematode infection load”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–938 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato and eggplant plants inoculated with Meloidogyne javanica (M. javanica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–499 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower irrigation levels reduced nematode infection further.

Treatment
lower levels of irrigatione0
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae1pathogen
Outcome
Nematode infectione0
Direction
reduced even furthere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nematode infection was reduced even further at lower levels of irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1013 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato and eggplant plants inoculated with Meloidogyne javanica (M. javanica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–499 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower irrigation markedly reduced plant fresh weight.

Treatment
lower levels of irrigatione0
Outcome
fresh and dry weightse0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower levels of irrigation, however this also led to marked reductions in fresh and dry weights of the tomato and eggplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1110 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed 80% or 60% field capacity deficit irrigation to improve water use efficiency while limiting infection and growth loss.

Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pathogen
Outcome
deficit irrigation could be used at a rate of 80% or 60% of FCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deficit irrigation could be used at a rate of 80% or 60% of FC to increase water use efficiency and reduce the level of RKN (M. javanica) infection without greatly reducing the growth performance of tomato and eggplant crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1347 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 19 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

irrigation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

175 papers: 106 positive, 69 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 106 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

171 papers more in this group

See all 175 papers →

irrigation · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.