Paper · 2015 · South African Journal of Plant and Soil

Greenhouse evaluation of deficit irrigation on the growth of tomato and eggplant and their interactions withMeloidogyne javanica

Osama Mohawesh; Muwaffaq Karajeh

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Deficit irrigation is considered to be an important approach for crop cultivation in dry regions where water resources are scarce. Deficit irrigation can be used also to decrease the level of infections by some moisturedependent plant pests and diseases such as root-knot nematode disease. Therefore, deficit irrigation at levels of 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% of field capacity was evaluated on tomato and eggplant in either the presence or absence of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica under greenhouse conditions. At irrigation levels of 20%, 40% and 60%, there was a significant decrease in leaf area, leaf water potential and growth parameters of tomato and eggplant compared to 80% and 100% of field capacity. In addition, a significant reduction in root galling and final nematode population occurred with deficit irrigation levels. Therefore, deficit irrigation at 80% of field capacity can be used to enhance water use efficiency and to increase the effectiveness of the current control strategies to control M. javanica without greatly affecting the growth of tomato and eggplant. However, more studies are still needed to confirm these results under different field conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 20%, 40% or 60% of field capacity significantly decreased tomato leaf area, leaf water potential and growth parameters versus 80% and 100%.

Treatment
irrigation levels of 20%, 40% and 60%e0
Outcome
leaf area, leaf water potential and growth parameterse0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
80% and 100% of field capacitye0
Setting
greenhouset0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At irrigation levels of 20%, 40% and 60%, there was a significant decrease in leaf area, leaf water potential and growth parameters of tomato and eggplant compared to 80% and 100% of field capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 20%, 40% or 60% of field capacity significantly decreased eggplant leaf area, leaf water potential and growth parameters versus 80% and 100%.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae0
Treatment
irrigation levels of 20%, 40% and 60%e0
Outcome
leaf area, leaf water potential and growth parameterse0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
80% and 100% of field capacitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At irrigation levels of 20%, 40% and 60%, there was a significant decrease in leaf area, leaf water potential and growth parameters of tomato and eggplant compared to 80% and 100% of field capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation significantly reduced root galling.

Treatment
deficit irrigation levelse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicat0pest
Outcome
root gallinge0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant reduction in root galling and final nematode population occurred with deficit irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato and eggplant and their interactions withMeloidogyne javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation significantly reduced final nematode population.

Treatment
deficit irrigation levelse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicat0pest
Outcome
final nematode populatione0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant reduction in root galling and final nematode population occurred with deficit irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato and eggplant and their interactions withMeloidogyne javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–128 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 80% field capacity irrigation for water use efficiency and nematode control without greatly affecting growth.

Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pest
Outcome
deficit irrigation at 80% of field capacity can be used to enhance water use efficiency and to increase the effectiveness of the current control strategies to control M. javanica without greatly affecting the growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deficit irrigation at 80% of field capacity can be used to enhance water use efficiency and to increase the effectiveness of the current control strategies to control M. javanica without greatly affecting the growth of tomato and eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1092 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 117 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 117 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

irrigation · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.