Abstract
Deficit irrigation is considered to be an important approach for crop cultivation in dry regions where water resources are scarce. Deficit irrigation can be used also to decrease the level of infections by some moisturedependent plant pests and diseases such as root-knot nematode disease. Therefore, deficit irrigation at levels of 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% of field capacity was evaluated on tomato and eggplant in either the presence or absence of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica under greenhouse conditions. At irrigation levels of 20%, 40% and 60%, there was a significant decrease in leaf area, leaf water potential and growth parameters of tomato and eggplant compared to 80% and 100% of field capacity. In addition, a significant reduction in root galling and final nematode population occurred with deficit irrigation levels. Therefore, deficit irrigation at 80% of field capacity can be used to enhance water use efficiency and to increase the effectiveness of the current control strategies to control M. javanica without greatly affecting the growth of tomato and eggplant. However, more studies are still needed to confirm these results under different field conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 20%, 40% or 60% of field capacity significantly decreased tomato leaf area, leaf water potential and growth parameters versus 80% and 100%.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- irrigation levels of 20%, 40% and 60%e0
- Outcome
- leaf area, leaf water potential and growth parameterse0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Comparator
- 80% and 100% of field capacitye0
- Setting
- greenhouset0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“At irrigation levels of 20%, 40% and 60%, there was a significant decrease in leaf area, leaf water potential and growth parameters of tomato and eggplant compared to 80% and 100% of field capacity”
t0“Greenhouse”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 20%, 40% or 60% of field capacity significantly decreased eggplant leaf area, leaf water potential and growth parameters versus 80% and 100%.
- Taxon
- eggplant
Solanum melongenae0 - Treatment
- irrigation levels of 20%, 40% and 60%e0
- Outcome
- leaf area, leaf water potential and growth parameterse0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Comparator
- 80% and 100% of field capacitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“At irrigation levels of 20%, 40% and 60%, there was a significant decrease in leaf area, leaf water potential and growth parameters of tomato and eggplant compared to 80% and 100% of field capacity”
Claim · model-written summary
Deficit irrigation significantly reduced root galling.
- Taxon
- tomato and eggplant
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum melongenat0 - Treatment
- deficit irrigation levelse0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicat0pest
- Outcome
- root gallinge0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“a significant reduction in root galling and final nematode population occurred with deficit irrigation levels”
t0“tomato and eggplant and their interactions withMeloidogyne javanica”
Claim · model-written summary
Deficit irrigation significantly reduced final nematode population.
- Taxon
- tomato and eggplant
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum melongenat0 - Treatment
- deficit irrigation levelse0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicat0pest
- Outcome
- final nematode populatione0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“a significant reduction in root galling and final nematode population occurred with deficit irrigation levels”
t0“tomato and eggplant and their interactions withMeloidogyne javanica”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 80% field capacity irrigation for water use efficiency and nematode control without greatly affecting growth.
- Taxon
- tomato and eggplant
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum melongenae0 - Interactor
- M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pest
- Outcome
- deficit irrigation at 80% of field capacity can be used to enhance water use efficiency and to increase the effectiveness of the current control strategies to control M. javanica without greatly affecting the growthe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“deficit irrigation at 80% of field capacity can be used to enhance water use efficiency and to increase the effectiveness of the current control strategies to control M. javanica without greatly affecting the growth of tomato and eggplant”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · physiology: water · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 117 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
143 papers more in this group
See all 147 papers →irrigation · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
irrigation · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.