Paper · 2015 · HortScience

Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) Plant Growth and Fruit Yield as Affected by Drip Irrigation Rate

Juan Carlos Díaz-Pérez; Touria E. Eaton

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
68
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Eggplant ( Solanum melongena L.) is an increasingly popular crop in the United States. In the southeastern United States, eggplant is often produced with high levels of irrigation water [above the rate of crop evapotranspiration (ETc)], resulting in water waste and nitrogen (N) leaching. The objective of this research was to assess the effects of irrigation rate on plant growth and fruit yield in eggplant. The study was conducted in Tifton, GA, in the fall of 2010 and 2011. Eggplant plants cv. Santana were grown on raised beds (1.8 m centers) covered with white plastic film mulch. There was a single drip tape along the center of the bed. The design was a randomized complete block with five treatments and four replications. Treatments consisted of irrigation rates based on ETc (33%, 67%, 100%, 133%, and 167% ETc). Plant growth, chlorophyll index (CI), and volumetric soil water content (SWC) were monitored over the season. In 2010, SWC (0–30 cm deep) increased and soil nitrate levels decreased with increasing irrigation rates. Foliar N and potassium (K), and CI decreased with increasing irrigation rate, probably due to a dilution effect. Stem diameter, leaf dry weight (DW), and vegetative top DW increased with increasing irrigation rate. Net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance ( g S ) were lowest at 33% ETc. Fruit number and fruit yields (marketable and total) were also lowest at 33% ETc and there were little yield differences among irrigation rates higher than 33% ETc. In 2011, irrigation rate had minor or no effect on SWC, plant growth of mature plants, leaf gas exchange, and fruit number and yield. The no treatment effect observed for eggplant in 2011 was likely because study was conducted in a low field that remained moist most of the time, nullifying the treatment effects. Results suggested that eggplant may tolerate mild water stress, since plants irrigated at 67% ETc produced fruit yields similar to those of plants irrigated at 100% ETc or higher rates. Thus, there is a potential to save water by reducing current irrigation rates without negatively impacting fruit yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2010, soil water content increased with irrigation rate.

Taxon
EggplantSolanum melongenat0
Treatment
increasing irrigation ratese0
Outcome
SWC (0–30 cm deep)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2010, SWC (0–30 cm deep) increased and soil nitrate levels decreased with increasing irrigation rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2010, soil nitrate declined with irrigation rate.

Taxon
EggplantSolanum melongenat0
Treatment
increasing irrigation ratese0
Outcome
soil nitrate levelse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2010, SWC (0–30 cm deep) increased and soil nitrate levels decreased with increasing irrigation rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nitrogen, potassium, and chlorophyll index declined as irrigation rate increased.

Taxon
EggplantSolanum melongenat0
Treatment
increasing irrigation ratee0
Outcome
Foliar N and potassium (K), and CIe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar N and potassium (K), and CI decreased with increasing irrigation rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem diameter, leaf dry weight, and vegetative top dry weight rose with irrigation rate.

Taxon
EggplantSolanum melongenat0
Treatment
increasing irrigation ratee0
Outcome
Stem diameter, leaf dry weight (DW), and vegetative top DWe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem diameter, leaf dry weight (DW), and vegetative top DW increased with increasing irrigation rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance were lowest at 33% ETc.

Taxon
EggplantSolanum melongenat0
Treatment
33% ETce0
Outcome
Net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance ( g S )e0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance ( g S ) were lowest at 33% ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit number was lowest at 33% ETc.

Taxon
EggplantSolanum melongenat0
Treatment
33% ETce0
Outcome
Fruit numbere0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit number and fruit yields (marketable and total) were also lowest at 33% ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1412 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable and total fruit yields were lowest at 33% ETc.

Taxon
EggplantSolanum melongenat0
Treatment
33% ETce0
Outcome
fruit yields (marketable and total)e0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit number and fruit yields (marketable and total) were also lowest at 33% ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1412 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield differences among irrigation rates above 33% ETc were small.

Taxon
EggplantSolanum melongenat0
Outcome
yield differencese0
Direction
littlee0
Comparator
irrigation rates higher than 33% ETce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were little yield differences among irrigation rates higher than 33% ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2011, irrigation had minor or no effects on soil water, mature growth, gas exchange, fruit number, and yield.

Taxon
EggplantSolanum melongenat0
Treatment
irrigation ratee0
Outcome
SWC, plant growth of mature plants, leaf gas exchange, and fruit number and yielde0
Direction
minor or no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2011, irrigation rate had minor or no effect on SWC, plant growth of mature plants, leaf gas exchange, and fruit number and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The moist low field likely explained the absence of treatment effects in 2011.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenat0
Outcome
no treatment effecte0
Qualifier
low field that remained moist most of the timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The no treatment effect observed for eggplant in 2011 was likely because study was conducted in a low field that remained moist most of the time, nullifying the treatment effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields at 67% ETc resembled those at 100% ETc or higher.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenat0
Treatment
67% ETce0
Outcome
fruit yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
100% ETc or higher ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants irrigated at 67% ETc produced fruit yields similar to those of plants irrigated at 100% ETc or higher rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1881–1995 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest reducing irrigation rates to save water without reducing fruit yield.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenat0
Outcome
save water by reducing current irrigation rates without negatively impacting fruit yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is a potential to save water by reducing current irrigation rates without negatively impacting fruit yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2003–2116 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑

irrigation · nutrient: content · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · growth · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 19 positive, 6 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

irrigation · soil: physics · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.