Paper · 2010 · CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa)

Optimization of aroma production in grape cell suspension induced by chemical elicitors

Claudio D’Onofrio; Pk Boss

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In many functional genomic studies, cell suspension cultures have been very useful experimental tools. Experiments with grape cell suspensions are quick and convenient compared to studies on whole vines and berries, they make it easy to control the environment conditions and to manipulate with accuracy the experiment conditions, and it is possible to carry out experiments all year. Cell suspensions of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ have been set up in Gamborgs B5 liquid medium with minimal organics supplemented with 30 gL-1 sucrose, 0.25 gL-1 casein hydrolysate, 0.93 M kinetin and 0.54 M naphthaleneacetic acid by callus cultures established from young berries on the same medium solidified with and 0.8% (w/v) of agar. The cultures were incubated in darkness on an orbital shaker at 100 rpm. The cell suspensions were sub-cultured every 2 weeks using an initial packed cell volume (PCV) of 15%. In a set of preliminary experiments the effect of some elicitors (abscisic acid; epibrassinolide; ethephon; mannitol; jasmonic acid, methyl-jasmonate; polyethylene glycol; salicylic acid; sorbitol; sucrose) on induction of secondary metabolites in cell suspensions were tested. Among those methyl-jasmonate (MeJA) induced the production of at least 25 compounds with sesquiterpene-like mass spectra. Sesquiterpene production was assayed in the cell cultures at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 hours after the addition of 500 μM MeJA. To study the interaction between MeJA concentration and PCV at the moment of elicitor addition, the production of volatile compounds was assayed in cell suspensions induced with 500 μM of MeJA added at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 days after cell suspension subcultures were set up with an initial PCV of 28%. In a subsequent experiment, different concentrations of MeJA (0, 50, 100, 250, 500, 750, 1000, 1500, 2000, 3000 μM) were tested for their effect on volatile production when added to a cell suspension with a PCV of 35%. The production of sequiterpenes began 12 hours after the addition of MeJA, and reached a maximum 72 hours after MeJA addition. The production of sesquiterpenes quickly decreased with an increase of cell suspension PCV at the moment of MeJA addition, suggesting a strong interaction between PCV and MeJA concentration. The most effective concentration of MeJA in stimulating the production of sesquiterpenes, was found to be 500 μM if added when the cell suspensions had a PCV of 35%, and 1000 if added when the cell suspensions had a PCV of 70%. So the optimal concentration of MeJA for induction of sesquiterpenes appeared to be 1.43 μmol per ml of PCV. These results suggest that in the interaction elicitor/density of cell in suspension the real important parameter is the concentration of elicitor per PCV unit and not the concentration of elicitor per total cell suspension volume. The viability of cells drastically decreased after the addition of MeJA and this decrease depended of concentration of MeJA added. MeJA also induced a significantly greater amount of proanthocyanidins and stilbenes in the cell cultures. The analysis of gene expressions by real-time RT-PCR and microarray analysis revealed that the mechanism by which jasmonates induced the production of secondary metabolites in cultured grape cells varied depending on the pathway [1].

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MeJA induced the production of at least 25 compounds with sesquiterpene-like mass spectra in grape cell suspensions, among the elicitors tested.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
methyl-jasmonate (MeJA)e1
Outcome
production of at least 25 compounds with sesquiterpene-like mass spectrae1
Value
at least 25 compoundse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“grape cell suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among those methyl-jasmonate (MeJA) induced the production of at least 25 compounds with sesquiterpene-like mass spectra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1293 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesquiterpene production began 12 hours after MeJA addition in grape cell suspensions.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
addition of MeJAe1
Outcome
production of sequiterpenes begane1
Value
12 hourse1

Verbatim

t0

“grape cell suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“The production of sequiterpenes began 12 hours after the addition of MeJA, and reached a maximum 72 hours after MeJA addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1959–2084 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesquiterpene production reached a maximum 72 hours after MeJA addition in grape cell suspensions.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
MeJA additione1
Outcome
reached a maximume1
Value
72 hourse1

Verbatim

t0

“grape cell suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“The production of sequiterpenes began 12 hours after the addition of MeJA, and reached a maximum 72 hours after MeJA addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1959–2084 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesquiterpene production decreased as cell suspension PCV increased at the moment of MeJA addition, suggesting a strong PCV by MeJA interaction.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
increase of cell suspension PCVe1
Outcome
production of sesquiterpenese1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
a strong interaction between PCV and MeJA concentratione2

Verbatim

t0

“grape cell suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“The production of sesquiterpenes quickly decreased with an increase of cell suspension PCV at the moment of MeJA addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2086–2207 · show in text ↑
e2

“suggesting a strong interaction between PCV and MeJA concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2209–2275 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The most effective MeJA concentration for stimulating sesquiterpene production was 500 μM when MeJA was added at a PCV of 35%.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
MeJAe1
Outcome
most effective concentration of MeJA in stimulating the production of sesquiterpenese1
Value
500 μMe1
Qualifier
if added when the cell suspensions had a PCV of 35%e1

Verbatim

t0

“grape cell suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“The most effective concentration of MeJA in stimulating the production of sesquiterpenes, was found to be 500 μM if added when the cell suspensions had a PCV of 35%, and 1000 if added when the cell suspensions had a PCV of 70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2277–2503 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The most effective MeJA concentration for stimulating sesquiterpene production was 1000 when MeJA was added at a PCV of 70%.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
MeJAe1
Outcome
most effective concentration of MeJA in stimulating the production of sesquiterpenese1
Value
1000e1
Qualifier
if added when the cell suspensions had a PCV of 70%e1

Verbatim

t0

“grape cell suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“The most effective concentration of MeJA in stimulating the production of sesquiterpenes, was found to be 500 μM if added when the cell suspensions had a PCV of 35%, and 1000 if added when the cell suspensions had a PCV of 70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2277–2503 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal MeJA concentration for sesquiterpene induction was 1.43 μmol per ml of PCV.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
optimal concentration of MeJA for induction of sesquiterpenese1
Value
1.43 μmol per ml of PCVe1

Verbatim

t0

“grape cell suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“So the optimal concentration of MeJA for induction of sesquiterpenes appeared to be 1.43 μmol per ml of PCV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2505–2612 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The concentration of elicitor per PCV unit, not per total suspension volume, is suggested to be the important parameter for sesquiterpene induction by MeJA.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
the real important parametere1
Qualifier
the concentration of elicitor per PCV unit and not the concentration of elicitor per total cell suspension volumee1

Verbatim

t0

“grape cell suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“These results suggest that in the interaction elicitor/density of cell in suspension the real important parameter is the concentration of elicitor per PCV unit and not the concentration of elicitor per total cell suspension volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2614–2844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MeJA addition drastically decreased the viability of grape cells.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
addition of MeJAe1
Outcome
viability of cellse1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“grape cell suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“The viability of cells drastically decreased after the addition of MeJA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2846–2917 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in grape cell viability depended on the concentration of MeJA added.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
concentration of MeJAe1
Outcome
viability of cellse1
Direction
decreasede1

Verbatim

t0

“grape cell suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“The viability of cells drastically decreased after the addition of MeJA and this decrease depended of concentration of MeJA added”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2846–2975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MeJA significantly increased the amount of proanthocyanidins and stilbenes in grape cell cultures.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
MeJAe1
Outcome
amount of proanthocyanidins and stilbenese1
Direction
greatere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“grape cell suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“MeJA also induced a significantly greater amount of proanthocyanidins and stilbenes in the cell cultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2977–3081 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jasmonate induction of secondary metabolite production in grape cells works through pathway-dependent mechanisms, as shown by gene expression analysis.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
jasmonatese1
Outcome
production of secondary metabolitese1
Qualifier
varied depending on the pathwaye1

Verbatim

e1

“The analysis of gene expressions by real-time RT-PCR and microarray analysis revealed that the mechanism by which jasmonates induced the production of secondary metabolites in cultured grape cells varied depending on the pathway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3083–3311 · show in text ↑

(-)-methyl jasmonate · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

(-)-methyl jasmonate · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

(-)-methyl jasmonate · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.