Paper · 2001 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Phytochrome A Mediates Blue Light and UV-A-Dependent Chloroplast Gene Transcription in Green Leaves

Louis Chun; Alana Kawakami; David A. Christopher

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
59
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

We characterized the photobiology of light-activated chloroplast transcription and transcript abundance in mature primary leaves by using the following two systems: transplastomic promoter-reporter gene fusions in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), and phytochrome (phyA, phyB, and hy2) and cryptochrome (cry1) mutants of Arabidopsis. In both dicots, blue light and UV-A radiation were the major signals that activated total chloroplast and psbA, rbcL, and 16S rrn transcription. In contrast, transcription activities in plants exposed to red and far-red light were 30% to 85% less than in blue light/UV-A, depending on the gene and plant species. Total chloroplast, psbA, and 16S rrn transcription were 60% to 80% less in the Arabidopsis phyA mutant exposed to blue light/UV-A relative to wild type, thus definitively linking phyA signaling to these photoresponses. To our knowledge, the major role of phyA in mediating the blue light/UV-A photoresponses is a new function for phyA in chloroplast biogenesis at this stage of leaf development. Although rbcL expression in plants exposed to UV-A was 50% less in the phyA mutant relative to wild type, blue light-induced rbcL expression was not significantly affected in the phyA, phyB, and cry1 mutants. However, rbcL expression in blue light was 60% less in the phytochrome chromophore mutant, hy2, relative to wild type, indicating that another phytochrome species (phyC, D, or E) was involved in blue light-induced rbcL transcription. Therefore, at least two different phytochromes, as well as phytochrome-independent photosensory pathways, mediated blue light/UV-A-induced transcription of chloroplast genes in mature leaves.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light and UV-A activated chloroplast and three gene transcription targets in both dicots.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Treatment
blue light and UV-A radiatione0
Outcome
total chloroplast and psbA, rbcL, and 16S rrn transcriptione0
Direction
activatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both dicots, blue light and UV-A radiation were the major signals that activated total chloroplast and psbA, rbcL, and 16S rrn transcription”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–472 · show in text ↑
t0

“mutants of Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red and far red light yielded 30 to 85 percent less transcription than blue light or UV-A.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Treatment
red and far-red lighte0
Outcome
transcription activitiese0
Direction
lesse0
Value
30% to 85%e0
Comparator
blue light/UV-Ae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“transcription activities in plants exposed to red and far-red light were 30% to 85% less than in blue light/UV-A”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“mutants of Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arabidopsis phyA mutants had 60 to 80 percent lower total chloroplast, psbA and 16S rrn transcription under blue light or UV-A.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsise0
Material
phyA mutante0
Treatment
blue light/UV-Ae0
Gene
phyAe0
Outcome
Total chloroplast, psbA, and 16S rrn transcriptione0
Direction
lesse0
Value
60% to 80%e0
Comparator
wild typee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total chloroplast, psbA, and 16S rrn transcription were 60% to 80% less in the Arabidopsis phyA mutant exposed to blue light/UV-A relative to wild type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under UV-A, phyA mutants had 50 percent less rbcL expression.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Material
phyA mutante0
Treatment
UV-Ae0
Gene
rbcLe0
Outcome
rbcL expressione0
Direction
lesse0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
wild typee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rbcL expression in plants exposed to UV-A was 50% less in the phyA mutant relative to wild type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“mutants of Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light rbcL expression was not significantly affected in phyA, phyB, and cry1 mutants.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Material
phyA, phyB, and cry1 mutantse0
Treatment
blue lighte0
Gene
rbcLe0
Outcome
rbcL expressione0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“blue light-induced rbcL expression was not significantly affected in the phyA, phyB, and cry1 mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“mutants of Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light rbcL expression in hy2 mutants was 60 percent below wild type.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Material
hy2e0
Treatment
blue lighte0
Gene
rbcLe0
Outcome
rbcL expressione0
Direction
lesse0
Value
60%e0
Comparator
wild typee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rbcL expression in blue light was 60% less in the phytochrome chromophore mutant, hy2, relative to wild type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1364 · show in text ↑
t0

“mutants of Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–327 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer another phytochrome is involved in blue light rbcL transcription.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Gene
phyC, D, or Ee0
Outcome
blue light-induced rbcL transcriptione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“another phytochrome species (phyC, D, or E) was involved in blue light-induced rbcL transcription”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“mutants of Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–327 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer multiple phytochromes and independent sensory pathways mediate chloroplast transcription.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Outcome
transcription of chloroplast genese0
Qualifier
at least two different phytochromes, as well as phytochrome-independent photosensory pathwayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at least two different phytochromes, as well as phytochrome-independent photosensory pathways, mediated blue light/UV-A-induced transcription of chloroplast genes in mature leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1671 · show in text ↑
t0

“mutants of Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–327 · show in text ↑

uv · molecular: expression · ArabidopsisPositive and negative results

19 papers: 12 positive, 7 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

light · molecular: expression · ArabidopsisPositive and negative results

80 papers: 55 positive, 25 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.