Paper · 2012 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Endomycorrhizal Inoculation Effect On Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), OAT (Avena sativa L.), And Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Growth Cultivated In Two Soil Types Under Greenhouse Conditions

Abdul Khalil Gardezi; Sergio R. Marquez-Berber; Benjamín Figueroa-Sandoval; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of inoculation with Glomus intraradices on oat, beans, and wheat. The study was done under greenhouse conditions at the Montecillo Campus of the Postgraduate College, Mexico. Two soil types from San Luis Potosí State were used, one was red (Xerosol), and the other one was grey (Litosol). With and without Glomus intraradices inoculation. Three bean cultivars: Pinto Saltillo, Bayo comercial and Flor de Mayo; Chihuahua (oat variety); and Tlaxcala wheat genotype were planted. The experimental design was factorial complete randomized block and three replications. The result showed that bean yield (average 3.7 g plant-1), pod number and dry weight, leaf area, plant height, stem diameter, and aerial part dry weight were positively affected by the inoculation with Glomus intraradices, but not by soil type. A similar trend was observed in root length, volume and dry weight, and in the nodule number. In relation with the species studied, Phaseolus vulgaris varieties had higher values than wheat and oats in growth and yield variables evaluated. It is concluded that endomycorrhiza inoculation (Glomus intraradices) gave better growth and yield, especially in beans. The soil types studied did not affect significantly plant responses in this study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation improved bean yield, averaging 3.7 g plant-1.

Taxon
Beanst0
Treatment
inoculation with Glomus intraradicese0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
bean yielde0
Direction
positively affectede0
Value
3.7 g plant-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“bean yield (average 3.7 g plant-1), pod number and dry weight, leaf area, plant height, stem diameter, and aerial part dry weight were positively affected by the inoculation with Glomus intraradices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation improved bean pod number and dry weight.

Taxon
Beanst0
Treatment
inoculation with Glomus intraradicese0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
pod number and dry weighte0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“pod number and dry weight, leaf area, plant height, stem diameter, and aerial part dry weight were positively affected by the inoculation with Glomus intraradices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation improved bean leaf area, height and stem diameter.

Taxon
Beanst0
Treatment
inoculation with Glomus intraradicese0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
leaf area, plant height, stem diametere0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“leaf area, plant height, stem diameter, and aerial part dry weight were positively affected by the inoculation with Glomus intraradices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation improved bean aerial dry weight.

Taxon
Beanst0
Treatment
inoculation with Glomus intraradicese0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
aerial part dry weighte0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“aerial part dry weight were positively affected by the inoculation with Glomus intraradices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean root length, volume and dry weight followed a similar positive trend.

Taxon
Beanst0
Treatment
inoculation with Glomus intraradicese1
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese1symbiont
Outcome
root length, volume and dry weighte0
Direction
similar trende0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A similar trend was observed in root length, volume and dry weight, and in the nodule number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“positively affected by the inoculation with Glomus intraradices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean nodule number followed a similar positive trend.

Taxon
Beanst0
Treatment
inoculation with Glomus intraradicese1
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese1symbiont
Outcome
nodule numbere0
Direction
similar trende0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A similar trend was observed in root length, volume and dry weight, and in the nodule number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“positively affected by the inoculation with Glomus intraradices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–844 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean varieties had higher growth and yield values than wheat and oats.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Outcome
growth and yield variablese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
wheat and oatse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phaseolus vulgaris varieties had higher values than wheat and oats in growth and yield variables evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The studied soil types did not significantly affect plant responses.

Taxon
Beanst0
Treatment
soil types studiede0
Outcome
plant responsese0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The soil types studied did not affect significantly plant responses in this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–67 · show in text ↑

Rhizophagus intraradices · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Rhizophagus intraradices · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

126 papers: 106 positive, 20 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 83 positive, 7 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.