Paper · 1984 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effects of nitrogen fertilization method and tillage system on squash growth, nutrient uptake and fruit yield

D. A. Smittle; E. D. Threadgill; W. L. Dickens

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Squash, cv Dixie, grown on a Lakeland sand was subjected to factorial combinations of 3 tillage systems and 2 N application methods during 1979 and 1980. Fruit yield was greatest with a combination of moldboard plow tillage and application of 22 kg N/ha preplant and 18 kg/ha increments of N by fertigation 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 weeks after planting. Plant growth and nutrient uptake were greatest and N available for potential contamination of the ground‐water was least with subsoil‐bed tillage and N application by fertigation. Disc harrow tillage with 67 kg N/ha preplant and 45 kg N/ha 4 weeks after planting resulted in 42% less yield, 61% less plant growth, 29 to 64% less nutrient uptake and more than 5 times as much N available for potential contamination of the groundwater as the best practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moldboard plowing with staged nitrogen fertigation gave greatest fruit yield.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
moldboard plow tillage and application of 22 kg N/ha preplant and 18 kg/ha increments of N by fertigatione0
Outcome
Fruit yielde0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield was greatest with a combination of moldboard plow tillage and application of 22 kg N/ha preplant and 18 kg/ha increments of N by fertigation 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 weeks after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–353 · show in text ↑
t0

“squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoil-bed tillage with fertigation gave greatest plant growth.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
subsoil‐bed tillage and N application by fertigatione0
Outcome
Plant growthe0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth and nutrient uptake were greatest and N available for potential contamination of the ground‐water was least with subsoil‐bed tillage and N application by fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoil-bed tillage with fertigation gave greatest nutrient uptake.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
subsoil‐bed tillage and N application by fertigatione0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth and nutrient uptake were greatest and N available for potential contamination of the ground‐water was least with subsoil‐bed tillage and N application by fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoil-bed tillage with fertigation left least nitrogen available for groundwater contamination.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
subsoil‐bed tillage and N application by fertigatione0
Outcome
N available for potential contamination of the ground‐watere0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth and nutrient uptake were greatest and N available for potential contamination of the ground‐water was least with subsoil‐bed tillage and N application by fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disc harrow with staged nitrogen application reduced yield by 42% versus best practices.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
Disc harrow tillage with 67 kg N/ha preplant and 45 kg N/ha 4 weeks after plantinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lesse0
Value
42%e0
Comparator
best practicese0

Verbatim

e0

“Disc harrow tillage with 67 kg N/ha preplant and 45 kg N/ha 4 weeks after planting resulted in 42% less yield, 61% less plant growth, 29 to 64% less nutrient uptake and more than 5 times as much N available for potential contamination of the groundwater as the best practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disc harrow with staged nitrogen application reduced plant growth by 61%.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
Disc harrow tillage with 67 kg N/ha preplant and 45 kg N/ha 4 weeks after plantinge0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
lesse0
Value
61%e0
Comparator
best practicese0

Verbatim

e0

“Disc harrow tillage with 67 kg N/ha preplant and 45 kg N/ha 4 weeks after planting resulted in 42% less yield, 61% less plant growth, 29 to 64% less nutrient uptake and more than 5 times as much N available for potential contamination of the groundwater as the best practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disc harrow with staged nitrogen application reduced nutrient uptake by 29 to 64%.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
Disc harrow tillage with 67 kg N/ha preplant and 45 kg N/ha 4 weeks after plantinge0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
lesse0
Value
29 to 64%e0
Comparator
best practicese0

Verbatim

e0

“Disc harrow tillage with 67 kg N/ha preplant and 45 kg N/ha 4 weeks after planting resulted in 42% less yield, 61% less plant growth, 29 to 64% less nutrient uptake and more than 5 times as much N available for potential contamination of the groundwater as the best practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disc harrow with staged nitrogen application left over fivefold more nitrogen available for groundwater contamination.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
Disc harrow tillage with 67 kg N/ha preplant and 45 kg N/ha 4 weeks after plantinge0
Outcome
N available for potential contamination of the groundwatere0
Direction
moree0
Value
more than 5 timese0
Comparator
best practicese0

Verbatim

e0

“Disc harrow tillage with 67 kg N/ha preplant and 45 kg N/ha 4 weeks after planting resulted in 42% less yield, 61% less plant growth, 29 to 64% less nutrient uptake and more than 5 times as much N available for potential contamination of the groundwater as the best practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

tillage · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

tillage · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 8 positive, 6 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 17 positive, 6 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 22 positive, 6 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 42 positive, 9 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.