Paper · 2006 · Canadian Journal of Soil Science

In-crop application effect of nitrogen fertilizer on grain protein concentration of spring wheat in the Canadian prairies

R H McKenzie; E. Bremer; C A Grant; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Due to the price premium for high-protein wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), many producers are interested in the efficacy of in-crop application of low rates of N fertilizer for increasing grain protein concentration (GPC). We conducted field studies at 26 site-years in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba from 1998 to 2000 to determine if in-crop application (tillering, boot stage or anthesis) of N fertilizer [broadcast ammonium nitrate (AN) or foliar urea-ammonium-nitrate solution (UAN); 15 kg N ha -1 ] could economically increase GPC of a Canada Western Red Spring (CWRS) wheat cultivar (AC Barrie). Basal N fertilizer rates were 60 and 120 kg N ha -1 . The average increase in GPC due to in-crop N application was 3 g kg -1 . The increase in GPC was similar at basal N rates of 60 and 120 kg N ha -1 . Broadcast AN and foliar-applied UAN were generally equally effective at increasing GPC, but were not more effective than application at the time of seeding. Late application tended to increase GPC more effectively than early application. The increase in GPC due to application of in-crop N was not economic at most sites in this study, but might be greater if applied under more N deficient conditions. Key words: Split N application, foliar, timing

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In-crop nitrogen increased wheat grain protein concentration by 3 g kg -1 on average.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
in-crop N applicatione0
Outcome
GPCe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3 g kg -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average increase in GPC due to in-crop N application was 3 g kg -1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The protein increase was similar at basal nitrogen rates of 60 and 120 kg N ha -1.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
60e0
Outcome
increase in GPCe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
120 kg N ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in GPC was similar at basal N rates of 60 and 120 kg N ha -1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–805 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast AN and foliar UAN were generally equally effective at raising grain protein.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Broadcast ANe0
Outcome
GPCe0
Direction
equally effectivee0
Comparator
foliar-applied UANe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broadcast AN and foliar-applied UAN were generally equally effective at increasing GPC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In-crop nitrogen applications were not more effective than application at seeding.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Broadcast AN and foliar-applied UANe1
Outcome
GPCe1
Direction
not more effectivee0
Comparator
application at the time of seedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but were not more effective than application at the time of seeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–962 · show in text ↑
e1

“Broadcast AN and foliar-applied UAN were generally equally effective at increasing GPC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late application tended to raise protein more effectively than early application.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Late applicatione0
Outcome
GPCe0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
early applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late application tended to increase GPC more effectively than early application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In-crop nitrogen protein gains were not economic at most study sites.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
increase in GPCe0
Direction
not economice0
Qualifier
most sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in GPC due to application of in-crop N was not economic at most sites in this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑

urea ammonium nitrate · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

ammonium nitrate · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

transplanting · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

application · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 110 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 110 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Late soil nitrogen increased grain protein content in both wheat crops by 15%.

    Late‐Season Nitrogen Increases Improver Common and Durum Wheat Quality · 2015 · compared with control without N fertilization after the vegetative growth stage

    Opposite direction

  3. positive

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.