Abstract
Seed treatment with insecticides and fungicides has become an important practice for ensuring initial plant stand in establishing crops. In this context, the aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of chemical seed treatment with insecticides and fungicides on the physiological quality and health of the seeds of wheat cultivars. Seeds of the wheat cultivars BRS Pardela and BRS Gaivota were used, subjected to the following chemical treatments: 1- control, 2- carboxin + thiram + imidacloprid + thiodicarb, 3- carbendazim + thiram + imidacloprid + thiodicarb, 4- fipronil + thiophanate-methyl + pyraclostrobin, 5- triadimenol + imidacloprid + thiodicarb, 6- fipronil, and 7- imidacloprid + thiodicarb. Physiological quality was evaluated by tests of germination, accelerated aging, the length and dry weight of shoots and roots, and seedling emergence in the field. Seed health quality was evaluated by the blotter test method. The seeds of the wheat cultivars tested respond differently to the chemical treatments in regard to effects on germination and vigor. The treatment with triadimenol + imidacloprid + thiodicarb is harmful to seedling development. For the BRS Gaivota cultivar, the seed treatment with carboxin + thiram + imidacloprid + thiodicarb; and carbendazim + thiram + imidacloprid + thiodicarb improved seedling establishment in the field compared to the control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat cultivars differed in germination and vigor responses to chemical seed treatments.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- chemical treatmentse0
- Outcome
- germination and vigore0
- Direction
- differentlye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat seeds”
e0“The seeds of the wheat cultivars tested respond differently to the chemical treatments in regard to effects on germination and vigor.”
Claim · model-written summary
Triadimenol plus imidacloprid plus thiodicarb harmed wheat seedling development.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- triadimenol + imidacloprid + thiodicarbe0
- Outcome
- seedling developmente0
- Direction
- harmfule0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat seeds”
e0“The treatment with triadimenol + imidacloprid + thiodicarb is harmful to seedling development.”
Claim · model-written summary
Carboxin plus thiram plus imidacloprid plus thiodicarb improved field seedling establishment of BRS Gaivota versus control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- BRS Gaivotae0
- Treatment
- carboxin + thiram + imidacloprid + thiodicarbe0
- Outcome
- seedling establishmente0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- the controle0
- Setting
- the fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat seeds”
e0“For the BRS Gaivota cultivar, the seed treatment with carboxin + thiram + imidacloprid + thiodicarb; and carbendazim + thiram + imidacloprid + thiodicarb improved seedling establishment in the field compared to the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbendazim plus thiram plus imidacloprid plus thiodicarb improved field seedling establishment of BRS Gaivota versus control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- BRS Gaivotae0
- Treatment
- carbendazim + thiram + imidacloprid + thiodicarbe0
- Outcome
- seedling establishmente0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- the controle0
- Setting
- the fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat seeds”
e0“For the BRS Gaivota cultivar, the seed treatment with carboxin + thiram + imidacloprid + thiodicarb; and carbendazim + thiram + imidacloprid + thiodicarb improved seedling establishment in the field compared to the control.”
The same questions in other papers
imidacloprid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →triadimenol · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
carboxin · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →thiram · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →carbendazim · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.