Paper · 2006 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Enhancing disease resistance in harvested mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. ‘Matisu’) fruit by salicylic acid

Kaifang Zeng; Jiankang Cao; Weibo Jiang

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
134
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract To learn how salicylic acid (SA) may affect disease resistance in mango, mango fruit ( Mangifera indica L. cv. ‘Matisu’) were treated with 1 mmol L −1 SA solution under vacuum infiltration for 2 min at a low pressure (−80 kPa) and for an additional 10 min at air pressure. The fruit were inoculated with anthracnose ( Colletotichum gloeosporioides Penz.) spore suspension (1 × 10 4 CFU mL −1 ) and incubated at 13 °C, 85–95% RH. Disease incidence and lesion diameter in/on the SA‐treated fruit were 37.5% and 20.9% lower than that in/on control fruit on the 4th day of incubation. The study further showed that activities of defensive enzymes in the fruit were significantly enhanced by SA treatment. The activity of phenylalanine ammonia‐lyase (PAL) and β‐1,3‐glucanase in the SA‐treated fruit was over 6‐ or 0.9‐fold higher than that in control fruit on the 4th day after the fruit being treated with SA, respectively. Level of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) or superoxide radicals (O 2 − ) generation rate in SA‐treated fruit was 22.3% or 79.4% higher than that in controls on the 8th day after the fruit being treated with SA, respectively. These results suggested that PAL and β‐1,3‐glucanase, as well as H 2 O 2 or O 2 − , may be involved in the enhancement of disease resistance in mango fruit. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid lowered disease incidence by 37.5% on day four.

Treatment
SA‐treated fruite0
Interactor
Colletotichum gloeosporioides Penz.e1pathogen
Outcome
Disease incidencee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
37.5%e0
Qualifier
4th day of incubatione0
Comparator
control fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease incidence and lesion diameter in/on the SA‐treated fruit were 37.5% and 20.9% lower than that in/on control fruit on the 4th day of incubation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“anthracnose ( Colletotichum gloeosporioides Penz.) spore suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid lowered lesion diameter by 20.9% on day four.

Treatment
SA‐treated fruite0
Interactor
Colletotichum gloeosporioides Penz.e1pathogen
Outcome
lesion diametere0
Direction
lowere0
Value
20.9%e0
Comparator
control fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease incidence and lesion diameter in/on the SA‐treated fruit were 37.5% and 20.9% lower than that in/on control fruit on the 4th day of incubation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“anthracnose ( Colletotichum gloeosporioides Penz.) spore suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid enhanced defensive enzyme activities.

Treatment
SA treatmente0
Outcome
activities of defensive enzymese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“activities of defensive enzymes in the fruit were significantly enhanced by SA treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAL activity was over sixfold higher after treatment.

Treatment
SA‐treated fruite0
Gene
phenylalanine ammonia‐lyase (PAL)e0
Outcome
activity of phenylalanine ammonia‐lyase (PAL)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
over 6‐e0
Comparator
control fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity of phenylalanine ammonia‐lyase (PAL) and β‐1,3‐glucanase in the SA‐treated fruit was over 6‐ or 0.9‐fold higher than that in control fruit on the 4th day after the fruit being treated with SA, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beta-1,3-glucanase activity was 0.9-fold higher after treatment.

Treatment
SA‐treated fruite0
Gene
β‐1,3‐glucanasee0
Outcome
β‐1,3‐glucanasee0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.9‐folde0
Comparator
control fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity of phenylalanine ammonia‐lyase (PAL) and β‐1,3‐glucanase in the SA‐treated fruit was over 6‐ or 0.9‐fold higher than that in control fruit on the 4th day after the fruit being treated with SA, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide level was 22.3% higher on day eight.

Treatment
SA‐treated fruite0
Outcome
Level of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 )e0
Direction
highere0
Value
22.3%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Level of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) or superoxide radicals (O 2 − ) generation rate in SA‐treated fruit was 22.3% or 79.4% higher than that in controls on the 8th day after the fruit being treated with SA, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superoxide generation was 79.4% higher on day eight.

Treatment
SA‐treated fruite0
Outcome
superoxide radicals (O 2 − ) generation ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
79.4%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Level of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) or superoxide radicals (O 2 − ) generation rate in SA‐treated fruit was 22.3% or 79.4% higher than that in controls on the 8th day after the fruit being treated with SA, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose PAL, glucanase and reactive oxygen species contribute to resistance.

Gene
PAL and β‐1,3‐glucanasee0
Compound
H 2 O 2 or O 2 −e0
Outcome
enhancement of disease resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PAL and β‐1,3‐glucanase, as well as H 2 O 2 or O 2 − , may be involved in the enhancement of disease resistance in mango fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1308 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · physiology: oxidative · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

salicylic acid · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: enzyme activity · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.