Abstract
Field studies were conducted in 1998 and 1999 to investigate the effects of air-dried milled neem leaves, Siam weed leaves and roots each at 30kg/ha and 50kg/ha and carbofuran at 1.5kg a.i./ha and 2.5 kg a.i/ha on Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea cv. IT 86D- 715. Carbofuran-treated plants had the highest grain yield (1.7 t/ha), and the least root galling (0.6) at harvest while carbofuran – treated soil had the least nematode population after harvest and population of Pratylenchus spp was reduced by 83.2%, Helicotylenchus spp. by 86.5%, Xiphinema spp by 89.1% and Meloidogyne incognita by 94.8%. This was followed by the grain yield in neem leaf-treated plants (1.35 t/ha) with a root galling of 1.4, while nematode population in neem leaf-treated soil was reduced as follows: Pratylenchus spp., 67.6%, Helicotylenchus spp., 64.1%, Xiphinema spp., 64.8% and M. incognita, 83.4%. Grain yield in Siam weed –treated plants (0.8 t/ha) with a root galling of 1.7, was higher than that of control plants and population of Pratylenchus spp. was reduced by 49.9%, Helicotylenchus spp. by 59.1%, Xiphinema spp. by 63.2% and Meloidogyne incognita by 74.9%. Key Words: Meloidogyne; incognita; neem leaves; siam weed; leaves; siam weed roots; carbofuran Moor J. Agric. Res. Vol.4(1) 2003: 94-99
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 19
Claim · model-written summary
Carbofuran-treated cowpea had the highest grain yield at 1.7 t/ha.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae1 - Material
- IT 86D- 715e1
- Treatment
- Carbofurane0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.7 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Carbofuran-treated plants had the highest grain yield (1.7 t/ha)”
e1“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea cv. IT 86D- 715”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbofuran-treated cowpea had the least root galling, 0.6.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Treatment
- Carbofurane0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae1pathogen - Outcome
- root gallinge0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Value
- 0.6e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Carbofuran-treated plants had the highest grain yield (1.7 t/ha), and the least root galling (0.6) at harvest”
e1“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea cv. IT 86D- 715”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbofuran-treated soil had the least nematode population after harvest.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Treatment
- carbofurane0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
- Outcome
- nematode populatione0
- Direction
- leaste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“carbofuran – treated soil had the least nematode population after harvest”
e1“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbofuran reduced Pratylenchus spp. population by 83.2%.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae2
- Treatment
- carbofurane1
- Interactor
- Pratylenchus spp
Pratylenchuse0pathogen - Outcome
- population of Pratylenchus sppe0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 83.2%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“population of Pratylenchus spp was reduced by 83.2%”
e1“carbofuran – treated soil had the least nematode population”
e2“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbofuran reduced Helicotylenchus spp. population by 86.5%.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae3
- Treatment
- carbofurane2
- Interactor
- Helicotylenchus spp.
Helicotylenchuse0pathogen - Outcome
- Helicotylenchus spp.e0
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 86.5%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Helicotylenchus spp. by 86.5%”
e1“population of Pratylenchus spp was reduced by 83.2%, Helicotylenchus spp. by 86.5%”
e2“carbofuran – treated soil had the least nematode population”
e3“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbofuran reduced Xiphinema spp population by 89.1%.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae3
- Treatment
- carbofurane2
- Outcome
- Xiphinema sppe0
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 89.1%e0
.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
XiphinemaNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Xiphinema spp by 89.1%”
e1“population of Pratylenchus spp was reduced by 83.2%, Helicotylenchus spp. by 86.5%, Xiphinema spp by 89.1%”
e2“carbofuran – treated soil had the least nematode population”
e3“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbofuran reduced Meloidogyne incognita population by 94.8%.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae3
- Treatment
- carbofurane2
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- Meloidogyne incognitae0
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 94.8%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Meloidogyne incognita by 94.8%”
e1“population of Pratylenchus spp was reduced by 83.2%, Helicotylenchus spp. by 86.5%, Xiphinema spp by 89.1% and Meloidogyne incognita by 94.8%”
e2“carbofuran – treated soil had the least nematode population”
e3“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem leaf-treated cowpea yielded 1.35 t/ha.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Treatment
- neem leaf-treatede0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Value
- 1.35 t/hae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grain yield in neem leaf-treated plants (1.35 t/ha)”
e1“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem leaf-treated cowpea had root galling of 1.4.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Treatment
- neem leaf-treatede0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
- Outcome
- root gallinge0
- Value
- 1.4e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“neem leaf-treated plants (1.35 t/ha) with a root galling of 1.4”
e1“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem leaf treatment reduced Pratylenchus spp. by 67.6%.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Treatment
- neem leaf-treatede0
- Interactor
- Pratylenchus spp.Pratylenchuse0pathogen
- Outcome
- Pratylenchus spp.e0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 67.6%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nematode population in neem leaf-treated soil was reduced as follows: Pratylenchus spp., 67.6%”
e1“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem leaf treatment reduced Helicotylenchus spp. by 64.1%.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Treatment
- neem leaf-treatede0
- Interactor
- Helicotylenchus spp.Helicotylenchuse0pathogen
- Outcome
- Helicotylenchus spp.e0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 64.1%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nematode population in neem leaf-treated soil was reduced as follows: Pratylenchus spp., 67.6%, Helicotylenchus spp., 64.1%”
e1“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem leaf treatment reduced Xiphinema spp. by 64.8%.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Treatment
- neem leaf-treatede0
- Outcome
- Xiphinema spp.e0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 64.8%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nematode population in neem leaf-treated soil was reduced as follows: Pratylenchus spp., 67.6%, Helicotylenchus spp., 64.1%, Xiphinema spp., 64.8%”
e1“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem leaf treatment reduced M. incognita by 83.4%.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Treatment
- neem leaf-treatede0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- M. incognitae0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 83.4%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nematode population in neem leaf-treated soil was reduced as follows: Pratylenchus spp., 67.6%, Helicotylenchus spp., 64.1%, Xiphinema spp., 64.8% and M. incognita, 83.4%”
e1“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Siam weed-treated cowpea yielded 0.8 t/ha, above control plants.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Treatment
- Siam weed –treatede0
- Outcome
- Grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 0.8 t/hae0
- Comparator
- control plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yield in Siam weed –treated plants (0.8 t/ha) with a root galling of 1.7, was higher than that of control plants”
e1“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Siam weed-treated cowpea had root galling of 1.7.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Treatment
- Siam weed –treatede0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
- Outcome
- root gallinge0
- Value
- 1.7e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Siam weed –treated plants (0.8 t/ha) with a root galling of 1.7”
e1“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Siam weed treatment reduced Pratylenchus spp. by 49.9%.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae2
- Treatment
- Siam weed –treatede1
- Interactor
- Pratylenchus spp.Pratylenchuse0pathogen
- Outcome
- population of Pratylenchus spp.e0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 49.9%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“population of Pratylenchus spp. was reduced by 49.9%”
e1“Siam weed –treated plants”
e2“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Siam weed treatment reduced Helicotylenchus spp. by 59.1%.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae2
- Treatment
- Siam weed –treatede1
- Interactor
- Helicotylenchus spp.Helicotylenchuse0pathogen
- Outcome
- Helicotylenchus spp.e0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 59.1%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“population of Pratylenchus spp. was reduced by 49.9%, Helicotylenchus spp. by 59.1%”
e1“Siam weed –treated plants”
e2“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Siam weed treatment reduced Xiphinema spp. by 63.2%.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae2
- Treatment
- Siam weed –treatede1
- Outcome
- Xiphinema spp.e0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 63.2%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“population of Pratylenchus spp. was reduced by 49.9%, Helicotylenchus spp. by 59.1%, Xiphinema spp. by 63.2%”
e1“Siam weed –treated plants”
e2“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Siam weed treatment reduced Meloidogyne incognita by 74.9%.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae2
- Treatment
- Siam weed –treatede1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- Meloidogyne incognitae0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 74.9%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“population of Pratylenchus spp. was reduced by 49.9%, Helicotylenchus spp. by 59.1%, Xiphinema spp. by 63.2% and Meloidogyne incognita by 74.9%”
e1“Siam weed –treated plants”
e2“Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea”
The same questions in other papers
carbofuran · Pratylenchus · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
carbofuran · Helicotylenchus · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
carbofuran · Xiphinema · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
carbofuran · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
carbofuran · Meloidogyne incognita · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →botanical · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
76 papers more in this group
See all 80 papers →botanical · Meloidogyne incognita · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.