Paper · 1989 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Protein synthesis in green beans under salt stress conditions

M. Pessarakli; J.T. Huber; T.C. Tucker

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Salinity is a major agricultural problem in arid and semi‐arid regions, resulting in retarded plant growth and reduced crop yield. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of NaCl stress on nitrogen metabolism and protein synthesis in three varieties of green beans, and to select the most salt tolerant and suitable cultivar among the three for cultural practices. To achieve this goal, protein synthesis and protein‐15N content of three green bean cultivars (Phasedus vulgaris L., cv. 'Tender Improved', 'Slim Green', and 'Kentucky Wonder') were compared. This comparison was done by using 15N under three different NaCl salinity levels (Control = 0.3, 2.5, and 5.0 bars osmotic pressures), in Hoagland nutrient solution, in a growth chamber. The 7‐day‐old bean seedlings were grown for 7 additional days in complete Hoagland solution before and 7 days after the completion of salinization with NaCl. This was followed by a 15‐day 15N uptake period after 1SNH4 15NO3 addition to the culture solutions. Plant tissues were analyzed for crude protein and protein‐N (total and 15N) content. The crude protein and protein‐N (total and 15N) content of plants decreased with increased salinity for all three cultivars, however, the Tender Improved variety was the least severely affected by salinity among the three cultivars. Total crude protein and protein‐N content were substantially higher for shoots than for the roots. Nevertheless, shoots were more severely influenced than roots by salt stress when salinized plants were compared with the controls for each plant part. The adverse effect of salinity on protein synthesis was more severe at the highest (5.0 bars osmotic pressure) level of stress. Based on the results of this study, for growing conditions similar to this experiment, the Tender Improved cultivar appears the most salt tolerant and suitable among these three for cultural practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein and protein-N decreased with salinity in Tender Improved.

Taxon
green beanst0
Material
Tender Improvedt1
Treatment
increased salinitye0
Outcome
crude protein and protein‐N (total and 15N) contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The crude protein and protein‐N (total and 15N) content of plants decreased with increased salinity for all three cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“green beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–32 · show in text ↑
t1

“cv. 'Tender Improved'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein and protein-N decreased with salinity in Slim Green.

Taxon
green beanst0
Material
Slim Greent1
Treatment
increased salinitye0
Outcome
crude protein and protein‐N (total and 15N) contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The crude protein and protein‐N (total and 15N) content of plants decreased with increased salinity for all three cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“green beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–32 · show in text ↑
t1

“Slim Green”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein and protein-N decreased with salinity in Kentucky Wonder.

Taxon
green beanst0
Material
Kentucky Wondert1
Treatment
increased salinitye0
Outcome
crude protein and protein‐N (total and 15N) contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The crude protein and protein‐N (total and 15N) content of plants decreased with increased salinity for all three cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“green beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–32 · show in text ↑
t1

“Kentucky Wonder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–562 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tender Improved was least severely affected by salinity among the three cultivars.

Taxon
green beanst0
Material
Tender Improvede0
Outcome
affected by salinitye0
Direction
least severelye0
Comparator
three cultivarse0

Verbatim

e0

“the Tender Improved variety was the least severely affected by salinity among the three cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“green beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoots had substantially more total crude protein and protein-N than roots.

Taxon
green beanst0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Outcome
Total crude protein and protein‐N contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
rootse0

Verbatim

e0

“Total crude protein and protein‐N content were substantially higher for shoots than for the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1441 · show in text ↑
t0

“green beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress affected shoots more severely than roots relative to controls.

Taxon
green beanst0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
influencede0
Direction
more severelye0
Qualifier
compared with the controls for each plant parte0
Comparator
rootse0

Verbatim

e0

“shoots were more severely influenced than roots by salt stress when salinized plants were compared with the controls for each plant part”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1593 · show in text ↑
t0

“green beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity harmed protein synthesis most severely at 5.0 bars osmotic pressure.

Taxon
green beanst0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
protein synthesise0
Direction
more severee0
Qualifier
highest (5.0 bars osmotic pressure) level of stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The adverse effect of salinity on protein synthesis was more severe at the highest (5.0 bars osmotic pressure) level of stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1721 · show in text ↑
t0

“green beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–32 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Tender Improved appears the most salt tolerant and suitable cultivar for conditions like the experiment.

Taxon
green beanst0
Material
Tender Improvede0
Outcome
most salt tolerant and suitable among these three for cultural practicese0
Qualifier
growing conditions similar to this experimente0

Verbatim

e0

“for growing conditions similar to this experiment, the Tender Improved cultivar appears the most salt tolerant and suitable among these three for cultural practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1923 · show in text ↑
t0

“green beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–32 · show in text ↑

salinity · quality: protein · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.