Paper · 2011 · Agronomy Journal

Dry Bean Response to Salinity in Southern Manitoba

Robert J. Brogan; Jane C. Froese; Martin H. Entz

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Expansion of dry bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production into saline soil areas of Manitoba has led to increased concern regarding its yield and quality response to soil salinity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of salinity on dry bean productivity in southern Manitoba, including the application of a salt tolerance model for dry bean crops. Using a coulter‐based sensor (Veris 3100, Veris Technologies, Salina, KS) to measure apparent soil electrical conductivity (EC a ), surveys of dry bean fields with five levels of soil salinity conditions (very low to very high salinity zones) were created for four sites over 2 yr. High values of EC a were associated with high values of soil saturation extract electrical conductivity (EC e ). Across all site years, average root‐zone salinity (EC e ) values ranged from 0.77 to 11.16 dS m −1 The lowest salinity zones resulted in greater crop biomass, grain yield, harvested seed weight, and grain number, and tended to have greater plant stand densities and grain protein content than the highest salinity zones. A 50% decrease in relative crop yield was caused by EC e values between 4.88 and 8.35 dS m −1 EC a surveys were found to be an excellent tool for assessing the relative soil salinity status of study fields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest salinity zones gave greater crop biomass, grain yield and harvested seed weight of dry bean than the highest salinity zones.

Taxon
Dry Beant0
Treatment
lowest salinity zonese1
Outcome
crop biomass, grain yield, harvested seed weighte1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
highest salinity zonese1

Verbatim

e1

“The lowest salinity zones resulted in greater crop biomass, grain yield, harvested seed weight, and grain number, and tended to have greater plant stand densities and grain protein content than the highest salinity zones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean Response to Salinity in Southern Manitoba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest salinity zones gave greater grain number of dry bean than the highest salinity zones.

Taxon
Dry Beant0
Treatment
lowest salinity zonese1
Outcome
grain numbere1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
highest salinity zonese1

Verbatim

e1

“The lowest salinity zones resulted in greater crop biomass, grain yield, harvested seed weight, and grain number, and tended to have greater plant stand densities and grain protein content than the highest salinity zones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean Response to Salinity in Southern Manitoba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest salinity zones tended to have greater plant stand densities and grain protein content of dry bean.

Taxon
Dry Beant0
Treatment
lowest salinity zonese1
Outcome
plant stand densities and grain protein contente1
Direction
greatere1
Qualifier
tended to havee1
Comparator
highest salinity zonese1

Verbatim

e1

“The lowest salinity zones resulted in greater crop biomass, grain yield, harvested seed weight, and grain number, and tended to have greater plant stand densities and grain protein content than the highest salinity zones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean Response to Salinity in Southern Manitoba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EC e values between 4.88 and 8.35 dS m-1 were associated with a 50% decrease in relative crop yield of dry bean.

Taxon
Dry Beant0
Treatment
EC e values between 4.88 and 8.35e2
Outcome
relative crop yielde2
Direction
decreasee2
Value
50%e2

Verbatim

e2

“A 50% decrease in relative crop yield was caused by EC e values between 4.88 and 8.35 dS m −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean Response to Salinity in Southern Manitoba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High values of apparent soil electrical conductivity (EC a) were associated with high values of soil saturation extract electrical conductivity.

Treatment
EC ae3
Outcome
high values of soil saturation extract electrical conductivitye3
Direction
Highe3

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e3

“High values of EC a were associated with high values of soil saturation extract electrical conductivity (EC e )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–760 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EC a surveys were an excellent tool for assessing relative soil salinity status of dry bean fields, compared with soil saturation extract EC e.

Taxon
Dry Beant0
Outcome
relative soil salinity statuse4
Comparator
soil saturation extract electrical conductivitye3

Verbatim

e3

“High values of EC a were associated with high values of soil saturation extract electrical conductivity (EC e )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–760 · show in text ↑
e4

“EC a surveys were found to be an excellent tool for assessing the relative soil salinity status of study fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean Response to Salinity in Southern Manitoba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑

salinity · quality: protein · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

salinity · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 3 positive, 19 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.