Paper · 1979 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Response of grass swards to fertilizer N under cutting or grazing

M. V. Jackson; T. E. Williams

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
28
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY An experiment was conducted at six widely separated centres in England and Wales for 4 years to compare the response of a perennial ryegrass (cv. S. 23) sward to fertilizer N at input rates of 200, 400 and 600 kg N/ha under cutting-only or grazing-only management systems. Under both managements the yield response to N varied substantially and was always greater under cutting than grazing and the response was greater in the first than in subsequent years. Under cutting, significant responses were obtained from 200 to 400 kg N/ha at all sites and in all years but very few sites responded significantly from 400 to 600 kg N/ha after the first year. Under grazing there was on average of all sites (but not at every site) a significant response from 200 to 400 kg N/ha only in the first year. In subsequent years no single site gave a worthwhile response in each year. Under grazing no site showed a significant response from 400 to 600 kg N/ha. At the lowest application of nitrogen, 200 kg N/ha, dry-matter yields under grazing were greater than those under cutting on eight of the possible 24 centre-year occasions. At the two higher rates of applied nitrogen dry-matter yields under cutting were consistently greater than those under grazing. With smaller responses to applied nitrogen on grazed than on cut swards maximum yields were achieved under grazing with an input of about 200 kg N/ha less than under cutting management. The results suggest that cutting experiments cannot be used to predict herbage yields and responses to fertilizer nitrogen under grazing conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield response to fertilizer N was greater under cutting than under grazing.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Material
cv. S. 23e1
Treatment
cutting-onlye1
Outcome
yield response to Ne2
Direction
greatere2
Comparator
grazinge2
Setting
six widely separated centres in England and Walese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“An experiment was conducted at six widely separated centres in England and Wales for 4 years to compare the response of a perennial ryegrass (cv. S. 23) sward to fertilizer N at input rates of 200, 400 and 600 kg N/ha under cutting-only or grazing-only management systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–279 · show in text ↑
e2

“Under both managements the yield response to N varied substantially and was always greater under cutting than grazing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–398 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The response to N was greater in the first year than in subsequent years.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Outcome
responsee3
Direction
greatere3
Comparator
subsequent yearse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“An experiment was conducted at six widely separated centres in England and Wales for 4 years to compare the response of a perennial ryegrass (cv. S. 23) sward to fertilizer N at input rates of 200, 400 and 600 kg N/ha under cutting-only or grazing-only management systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–279 · show in text ↑
e3

“the response was greater in the first than in subsequent years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under cutting, significant yield responses were obtained from 200 to 400 kg N/ha at all sites and in all years.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Treatment
Under cuttinge4
Outcome
significant responses were obtainede4
Qualifier
from 200 to 400 kg N/ha at all sites and in all yearse4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“An experiment was conducted at six widely separated centres in England and Wales for 4 years to compare the response of a perennial ryegrass (cv. S. 23) sward to fertilizer N at input rates of 200, 400 and 600 kg N/ha under cutting-only or grazing-only management systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–279 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under cutting, significant responses were obtained from 200 to 400 kg N/ha at all sites and in all years but very few sites responded significantly from 400 to 600 kg N/ha after the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under cutting, very few sites responded significantly to N from 400 to 600 kg N/ha after the first year.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Treatment
from 400 to 600 kg N/hae4
Outcome
very few sites responded significantlye4
Qualifier
after the first yeare4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“An experiment was conducted at six widely separated centres in England and Wales for 4 years to compare the response of a perennial ryegrass (cv. S. 23) sward to fertilizer N at input rates of 200, 400 and 600 kg N/ha under cutting-only or grazing-only management systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–279 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under cutting, significant responses were obtained from 200 to 400 kg N/ha at all sites and in all years but very few sites responded significantly from 400 to 600 kg N/ha after the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under grazing, a significant response from 200 to 400 kg N/ha occurred on average across sites only in the first year.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Treatment
Under grazinge5
Outcome
a significant responsee5
Qualifier
only in the first yeare5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“An experiment was conducted at six widely separated centres in England and Wales for 4 years to compare the response of a perennial ryegrass (cv. S. 23) sward to fertilizer N at input rates of 200, 400 and 600 kg N/ha under cutting-only or grazing-only management systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–279 · show in text ↑
e5

“Under grazing there was on average of all sites (but not at every site) a significant response from 200 to 400 kg N/ha only in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under grazing, no site showed a significant response from 400 to 600 kg N/ha.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Treatment
Under grazinge6
Outcome
no site showed a significant responsee6
Qualifier
from 400 to 600 kg N/hae6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“An experiment was conducted at six widely separated centres in England and Wales for 4 years to compare the response of a perennial ryegrass (cv. S. 23) sward to fertilizer N at input rates of 200, 400 and 600 kg N/ha under cutting-only or grazing-only management systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–279 · show in text ↑
e6

“Under grazing no site showed a significant response from 400 to 600 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the lowest N rate of 200 kg N/ha, dry-matter yields under grazing were greater than under cutting on eight of 24 centre-year occasions.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Treatment
At the lowest application of nitrogen, 200 kg N/hae7
Outcome
dry-matter yields under grazinge7
Direction
greatere7
Value
eight of the possible 24 centre-year occasionse7
Comparator
those under cuttinge7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“An experiment was conducted at six widely separated centres in England and Wales for 4 years to compare the response of a perennial ryegrass (cv. S. 23) sward to fertilizer N at input rates of 200, 400 and 600 kg N/ha under cutting-only or grazing-only management systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–279 · show in text ↑
e7

“At the lowest application of nitrogen, 200 kg N/ha, dry-matter yields under grazing were greater than those under cutting on eight of the possible 24 centre-year occasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the two higher N rates, dry-matter yields under cutting were consistently greater than under grazing.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Treatment
At the two higher rates of applied nitrogene2
Outcome
dry-matter yields under cuttinge2
Direction
consistently greatere2
Comparator
under grazinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“An experiment was conducted at six widely separated centres in England and Wales for 4 years to compare the response of a perennial ryegrass (cv. S. 23) sward to fertilizer N at input rates of 200, 400 and 600 kg N/ha under cutting-only or grazing-only management systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–279 · show in text ↑
e2

“At the two higher rates of applied nitrogen dry-matter yields under cutting were consistently greater than those under grazing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On grazed swards, maximum yields were reached with about 200 kg N/ha less than under cutting management.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Treatment
under grazinge3
Outcome
maximum yieldse3
Direction
lesse3
Value
200 kg N/hae3
Comparator
under cutting managemente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“An experiment was conducted at six widely separated centres in England and Wales for 4 years to compare the response of a perennial ryegrass (cv. S. 23) sward to fertilizer N at input rates of 200, 400 and 600 kg N/ha under cutting-only or grazing-only management systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–279 · show in text ↑
e3

“maximum yields were achieved under grazing with an input of about 200 kg N/ha less than under cutting management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1442 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting experiments cannot be used to predict herbage yields and N responses under grazing conditions.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Outcome
predict herbage yieldse4
Comparator
under grazing conditionse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“An experiment was conducted at six widely separated centres in England and Wales for 4 years to compare the response of a perennial ryegrass (cv. S. 23) sward to fertilizer N at input rates of 200, 400 and 600 kg N/ha under cutting-only or grazing-only management systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–279 · show in text ↑
e4

“cutting experiments cannot be used to predict herbage yields and responses to fertilizer nitrogen under grazing conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1591 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Results differ

59 papers: 44 positive, 15 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

grazing · yield · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 21 positive, 11 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

pruning · yield · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 22 positive, 17 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.