Paper · 2015 · Grass and Forage Science

A comparison between cutting and animal grazing for dry‐matter yield, quality and tiller density of perennial ryegrass cultivars

P. A. Cashman; M. McEvoy; T. J. Gilliland; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne L.) evaluation trials are often conducted under simulated grazing to identify the most productive cultivars. It is unclear whether simulated grazing identifies the most productive cultivar for animal‐grazed swards. Ten cultivars were established as plots and managed concurrently under simulated grazing ( SG ), animal grazing ( AG ) and conservation ( CON ). The experiment lasted 3 years with dry‐matter ( DM ) off‐take, digestibility, tiller density and ground‐cover score recorded in all years. A good relationship existed between DM off‐take under SG and CON ( R 2 = 0·73). The relationship between SG and AG was strongest in year 2 and 3 ( R 2 = 0·53 and 0·55 respectively). High DM production was observed in SG swards in year 1; this was weakly related to the DM production of the AG sward. Across the 3 years, the CON treatment had higher yields than either of the other two treatments and was poorly correlated to DM yield under AG , confirming that cultivars should be evaluated under a similar defoliation frequency to their intended use. Tiller density declined quickest under CON and slowest under AG . Some reranking of cultivars occurred between defoliation managements. The results show that simulated grazing is a useful indicator of DM yield performance of animal‐grazed swards.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter off-take under simulated grazing and conservation was related, with R² 0.73.

Taxon
Perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Treatment
SGe0
Outcome
DM off‐takee0
Value
R 2 = 0·73e0
Comparator
CONe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A good relationship existed between DM off‐take under SG and CON ( R 2 = 0·73).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“Perennial ryegrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The simulated to animal grazing dry matter relationship had R² 0.53 in year 2.

Taxon
Perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Outcome
relationship between SG and AGe0
Value
R 2 = 0·53e0
Qualifier
year 2e0

Not reportedTreatmentDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relationship between SG and AG was strongest in year 2 and 3 ( R 2 = 0·53 and 0·55 respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Perennial ryegrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The simulated to animal grazing dry matter relationship had R² 0.55 in year 3.

Taxon
Perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Outcome
relationship between SG and AGe0
Value
0·55e0
Qualifier
year 2 and 3e0

Not reportedTreatmentDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relationship between SG and AG was strongest in year 2 and 3 ( R 2 = 0·53 and 0·55 respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Perennial ryegrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Year-one simulated grazing dry matter production was high but weakly related to animal grazing production.

Taxon
Perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Treatment
SGe0
Outcome
DM productione0
Qualifier
year 1e0
Comparator
AG swarde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High DM production was observed in SG swards in year 1; this was weakly related to the DM production of the AG sward.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“Perennial ryegrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation had higher yields than either grazing regime over three years.

Taxon
Perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Treatment
CON treatmente0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
3 yearse0
Comparator
other two treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Across the 3 years, the CON treatment had higher yields than either of the other two treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“Perennial ryegrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation dry matter yield was poorly correlated with animal grazing yield.

Taxon
Perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Treatment
CONe0
Outcome
DM yielde0
Comparator
AGe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the CON treatment had higher yields than either of the other two treatments and was poorly correlated to DM yield under AG”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“Perennial ryegrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tiller density fell fastest under conservation.

Taxon
Perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Treatment
CONe0
Outcome
Tiller densitye0
Direction
declined quickeste0
Comparator
AGe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tiller density declined quickest under CON and slowest under AG .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Perennial ryegrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tiller density fell slowest under animal grazing.

Taxon
Perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Treatment
AGe0
Outcome
Tiller densitye0
Direction
sloweste0
Comparator
CONe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tiller density declined quickest under CON and slowest under AG .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Perennial ryegrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some cultivars changed rank across defoliation managements.

Taxon
Perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Treatment
defoliation managementse0
Outcome
reranking of cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Some reranking of cultivars occurred between defoliation managements.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1231 · show in text ↑
t0

“Perennial ryegrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated grazing was found useful for indicating animal grazing dry matter yield performance.

Taxon
Perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Outcome
DM yield performancee0
Comparator
animal‐grazed swardse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“simulated grazing is a useful indicator of DM yield performance of animal‐grazed swards.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Perennial ryegrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend evaluating cultivars at defoliation frequencies similar to intended use.

Taxon
Perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Outcome
evaluated under a similar defoliation frequency to their intended usee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivars should be evaluated under a similar defoliation frequency to their intended use.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“Perennial ryegrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑

grazing · yield · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 21 positive, 11 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.