Paper · 1991 · Grass and Forage Science

Effect of regrowth interval on the productivity of swards defoliated by cutting and grazing

R. C. Binnie; D. M. B. Chestnutt

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
37
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Over three grazing seasons (1984‐1986) a sward of perennial ryegrass, cv. Talbot, which received a total of 336 kg N ha ‐1 each season, was cut or grazed with ewes at 3‐ or 4‐week intervals on a rotational basis. Sward productivity was higher under cutting than under grazing irrespective of the interval between defoliations. Under cutting, mean herbage organic matter (OM) yields over both intervals were 8·66, 9·62 and 8·17 t ha‐ 1 in 1984, 1985 and 1986 respectively while under grazing the corresponding yields were 7·65, 8·63 and 7·50 t ha ‐1 . The mean annual yield of herbage defoliated at 3‐week intervals was 7·50, 8·64 and 7 ·20 t OM ha ‐1 compared with 8·80, 9·60 and 8·46 t OM ha ‐1 for swards defoliated at 4‐week intervals in the three years respectively. The nitrogen (N) content of both the available and the residual herbage was consistently higher under grazing than under cutting. Available herbage contained 31·3 and 27·7 g N kg OM ‐1 and residual herbage 26·1 and 22·7 g N kg OM ‐1 under grazing and cutting respectively. The mean yield of N under cutting was 284 kg ha ‐1 compared with 304 kg ha ‐1 under grazing. Defoliation interval had no effect on N yield, the overall mean yield being 294 kg ha ‐1 under both 3‐ and 4‐week defoliation intervals. The effect of the treatments on tiller population was slight and inconclusive. The process of grazing reduced yield probably as a result of damage to the sward through trampling; the positive effect of excretal N on yield was minimal on account of the short grazing periods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sward productivity was higher under cutting than under grazing irrespective of defoliation interval.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
cuttinge1
Outcome
Sward productivitye1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
grazinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a sward of perennial ryegrass, cv. Talbot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sward productivity was higher under cutting than under grazing irrespective of the interval between defoliations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Swards defoliated at 4-week intervals gave higher mean annual herbage yield than those defoliated at 3-week intervals.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
swards defoliatede2
Outcome
mean annual yielde2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Comparator
herbage defoliatede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a sward of perennial ryegrass, cv. Talbot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“The mean annual yield of herbage defoliated at 3‐week intervals was 7·50, 8·64 and 7 ·20 t OM ha ‐1 compared with 8·80, 9·60 and 8·46 t OM ha ‐1 for swards defoliated at 4‐week intervals in the three years respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbage N content was higher under grazing than under cutting.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
grazinge4
Outcome
nitrogen (N) contente4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
cuttinge4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a sward of perennial ryegrass, cv. Talbot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–89 · show in text ↑
e4

“The nitrogen (N) content of both the available and the residual herbage was consistently higher under grazing than under cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–908 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N yield was higher under grazing than under cutting.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
grazinge5
Outcome
yield of Ne5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Comparator
cuttinge5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a sward of perennial ryegrass, cv. Talbot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–89 · show in text ↑
e5

“The mean yield of N under cutting was 284 kg ha ‐1 compared with 304 kg ha ‐1 under grazing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation interval had no effect on N yield of the ryegrass sward.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
Defoliation intervale3
Outcome
N yielde3
Direction
no effecte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a sward of perennial ryegrass, cv. Talbot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–89 · show in text ↑
e3

“Defoliation interval had no effect on N yield, the overall mean yield being 294 kg ha ‐1 under both 3‐ and 4‐week defoliation intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting and grazing had a slight and inconclusive effect on tiller population.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
the treatmentse6
Outcome
tiller populatione6
Direction
slight and inconclusivee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a sward of perennial ryegrass, cv. Talbot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–89 · show in text ↑
e6

“The effect of the treatments on tiller population was slight and inconclusive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1360 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing probably reduced sward yield through trampling damage.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
grazinge7
Outcome
yielde7
Qualifier
damage to the sward through tramplinge7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a sward of perennial ryegrass, cv. Talbot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“The process of grazing reduced yield probably as a result of damage to the sward through trampling; the positive effect of excretal N on yield was minimal on account of the short grazing periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1556 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The positive effect of excretal N on herbage yield was minimal.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
excretal Ne7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
minimale7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a sward of perennial ryegrass, cv. Talbot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“The process of grazing reduced yield probably as a result of damage to the sward through trampling; the positive effect of excretal N on yield was minimal on account of the short grazing periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1556 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 22 positive, 17 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.