Paper · 1996 · Journal of Tree Fruit Production

Effect of Five Weed Control Methods on Growth and Fruiting of 'McIntosh'/M.7 Apple Trees

J. R. Schupp; J. J. McCue

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
7
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The growth and fruiting of 10-year-old 'McIntosh'/ M.7 apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) trees were compared under the following weed management systems: untreated control; in-row herbicide spray (paraquat + oryzalin); in-row rotary tilling applied in May, June and July; in-row rotary tilling plus oryzalin; in-row rotary tilling plus oats sown in August. All weed control methods increased tree growth compared to the untreated control over three years. In 1989 and 1990, rotary tilling alone provided less weed control compared to the herbicide treatment, while in July 1991, the reverse was true. In-row rotary tilling with herbicide and with oats resulted in weed control comparable to or better than the herbicide treatment except for the in-row rotary tilled plus oats treatment in 1990. All weed control methods resulted in lower weed density ratings compared to the control. Yield and fruit size were increased by all weed control methods except the rotary tilled plus oats treatment. In-row rotary tilling plus oats produced yield and fruit size equivalent to the control. Differences in leaf and fruit mineral nutrient concentrations were significant in some years. All weed control methods reduced soil K concentrations. There were no differences among treatments in fruit color, set, maturity, and percent soluble solids.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed control methods increased apple tree growth against the untreated control.

Treatment
All weed control methodse0
Outcome
tree growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All weed control methods increased tree growth compared to the untreated control over three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Five Weed Control Methods on Growth and Fruiting of 'McIntosh'/M.7 Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotary tilling alone controlled weeds less than herbicide in 1989 and 1990.

Treatment
rotary tilling alonee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
herbicide treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1989 and 1990, rotary tilling alone provided less weed control compared to the herbicide treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Five Weed Control Methods on Growth and Fruiting of 'McIntosh'/M.7 Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotary tilling alone controlled weeds better than herbicide in July 1991.

Treatment
rotary tilling alonee0
Outcome
weed controle0
Comparator
herbicide treatmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1989 and 1990, rotary tilling alone provided less weed control compared to the herbicide treatment, while in July 1991, the reverse was true”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–596 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Five Weed Control Methods on Growth and Fruiting of 'McIntosh'/M.7 Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotary tilling with herbicide gave weed control comparable to or better than herbicide alone.

Treatment
In-row rotary tilling with herbicidee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
comparable to or bettere0
Comparator
herbicide treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In-row rotary tilling with herbicide and with oats resulted in weed control comparable to or better than the herbicide treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Five Weed Control Methods on Growth and Fruiting of 'McIntosh'/M.7 Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotary tilling with oats generally gave weed control comparable to or better than herbicide.

Treatment
with oatse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
comparable to or bettere0
Qualifier
except for the in-row rotary tilled plus oats treatment in 1990e0
Comparator
herbicide treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In-row rotary tilling with herbicide and with oats resulted in weed control comparable to or better than the herbicide treatment except for the in-row rotary tilled plus oats treatment in 1990”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Five Weed Control Methods on Growth and Fruiting of 'McIntosh'/M.7 Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed control methods lowered weed density ratings relative to control.

Treatment
All weed control methodse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed density ratingse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All weed control methods resulted in lower weed density ratings compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Five Weed Control Methods on Growth and Fruiting of 'McIntosh'/M.7 Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control methods other than rotary tilling plus oats increased apple yield and fruit size.

Treatment
all weed control methodse0
Outcome
Yield and fruit sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
except the rotary tilled plus oats treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield and fruit size were increased by all weed control methods except the rotary tilled plus oats treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Five Weed Control Methods on Growth and Fruiting of 'McIntosh'/M.7 Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotary tilling plus oats produced apple yield and fruit size equivalent to control.

Treatment
In-row rotary tilling plus oatse0
Outcome
yield and fruit sizee0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In-row rotary tilling plus oats produced yield and fruit size equivalent to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Five Weed Control Methods on Growth and Fruiting of 'McIntosh'/M.7 Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and fruit mineral concentrations differed significantly in some years.

Outcome
leaf and fruit mineral nutrient concentrationse0
Qualifier
in some yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in leaf and fruit mineral nutrient concentrations were significant in some years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Five Weed Control Methods on Growth and Fruiting of 'McIntosh'/M.7 Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed control methods reduced soil potassium concentrations.

Treatment
All weed control methodse0
Outcome
soil K concentrationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All weed control methods reduced soil K concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Five Weed Control Methods on Growth and Fruiting of 'McIntosh'/M.7 Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit color, set, maturity and soluble solids did not differ among treatments.

Outcome
fruit color, set, maturity, and percent soluble solidse0
Direction
no differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no differences among treatments in fruit color, set, maturity, and percent soluble solids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Five Weed Control Methods on Growth and Fruiting of 'McIntosh'/M.7 Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑

Avena sativa · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

tillage · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · weed · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

herbicide · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

herbicide · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

tillage · weed · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.